بعضی روزا دلم میخواست همه چی خودش پیش میرفت و نیازی نبود انقدر حرص بخورم بابت همه چیز و نگران باشم 🫠 ولی خب نه منطقیه و نه شدنی 🥹 شبتون بخیر و سرتون سلامت 💙
💔1

Channel
@farnazsaffarnezhad_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002079539135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farnazsaffarnezhad_official |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farnazsaffarnezhad_official |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 277 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 271 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 270 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 258 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 256 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 256 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعضی روزا دلم میخواست همه چی خودش پیش میرفت و نیازی نبود انقدر حرص بخورم بابت همه چیز و نگران باشم 🫠 ولی خب نه منطقیه و نه شدنی 🥹 شبتون بخیر و سرتون سلامت 💙
💔1
📆 ۲۶ مرداد ماه | دوشنبه میتونه نقطه عطف تو برای رویای تناسب اندامت باشه در ۶ ماه دوم سال 😍✨️ 🔖 ورکشاپِ تکنیک های ۲۰۲۶ لاغری دائمی و حذف چربی های شکم و پهلو بهت توصیه میکنم اگر تصمیم داری امسال مسیر تناسب اندامت رو واقعا تغییر بدی؛ این ورکشاپ رو از دست ندی 🤩🔥 ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
🔥1
با یاد گرفتن این موارد حتی با اراده ی ضعیفِ الانت هم میتونی هم وزن کم کنی؛ هم سایز کم کنی و هم به تناسب اندام دلخواهت برسی 😍👋🏻
🔖باید یکبار برای همیشه یاد بگیری : ☑️ چرا بعضیا با غذای بیشتر خوردن لاغر میشن ولی تو نه ؟ ☑️ چرا وزنت کم میشه ولی چربی شکمت تکون نمیخوره ؟ ☑️ چرا حتی آمپولای لاغری هم نمیتونه وزنت رو خیلی تغییری بده ؟ ☑️ اصلا مگه میشه گرسنگی نکشی و رژیم بگیری و وزن کم کنی ؟ و کلی مورد دیگه که هیچکس هیچ جا بهت نگفته ... ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
اگر فکر میکنی برای لاغری فقط باید اراده خوبی داشته باشی؛ متاسفم 😓👋🏻 یکی از بزرگترین دلایل شکست رژیم هات همینه‼️ چون؛ تقریبا ۹۰٪ مراجعین من به نظر خودشون بی اراده بودن ... ولی توی مسیر با قدم های کوچیک هم اراده ات قوی میشه 💪🏻 هم نتایج لاغری رو کم کم میبینی 😍✨️ ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
بعضی اطلاعات؛ تنها دستاوردشون لاغری نیست ! بلکه کمکت میکنن سالها انرژی، پول، وقت و سلامتیت هدر نره ! ✨️ خیلیاتون بعد از دورهمی ها میگید؛ کاش زودتر اینا رو میدونستم و انقدر هزینه پکیج های دمنوش و قرص و دارو الکی نمیکردم 🫠🤌🏻 ولی واقعا گاها هزینه اصلی، پول نیست 👋🏻 بلکه؛ هزینه اصلی ماه ها یا سالهاییه که با آزمون و خطا از دستت میره 😓 هزینه اصلی سلامتیه که باید ۲ برابر براش وقت بذاری تا مثل روز اول برش گردونی 🥲 ● @farnaz…
بچه های من با همین یدونه تکنیک تونستن وقتی توی مسیر کاهش وزن نیستن و دارن متابولیسمشون رو تثبیت میکنن👇🏻 چربی کم کنن 🔥 سایز کم کنن 👗 عضله بسازن 💪🏻 و وزنشون کم بشه 🤩 #نتایج ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
❤1
مثلا : 🔹️ تکنیکِ ۳ گانه سیری 🔹️ این تکنیک میگه : قبل از شروع هر وعده باید ۳ تا پیام به بدن و مغز برسه 👇🏻 🔖 پروتئین کافی برای سیر شدن و سیر نگه داشتن 🔖 حجم مناسب غذای توی بشقاب برای رضایت ذهنی 🔖 زمانبندی درست برای جلوگیری از گرسنگی شدید دلیلِ اینکه خیلیا بعد از گرفتنِ رژیم و کاهش وزن؛ وزنشون دوباره برمیگرده اینه که فقط یاد گرفتن کمتر غذا بخورن! اما یاد نگرفتن چجوری پیام سیری و گرسنگی بدنشون رو فعال کنن 🤌🏻 ● @farnaz…
خیلی وقت ها تو اراده کردی💪🏻 شروع کردی✨️ ادامه دادی😍 ولی شاید اگر فقط دو سه تکنیکِ مهم لاغری دائمی و اُصولی رو میدونستی میتونستی یکبار برای همیشه نتیجه دلخواهت رو ببینی 🥺 ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
با توجه به تجربه ی من و هزاران مشاوره ای که به صورت آنلاین و حضوری با آدمای مختلف داشتم و دورهمی هایی که داشتم و با شماها صحبت کردم؛ اراده فقط ۲۰/۳۰٪ مسیرته 🤌🏻 در واقع اراده مثل یه عضله است 💪🏻 برای همه از اولِ مسیر قوی نیست ❗️ ولی برای اونی که میخواد، توی مسیر قوی میشه 🏋🏻♀️ مثل زمانی که باشگاه میری... تمرین میکنی... فشار میاری روی تارهای عضلانیت... و باعثِ تقویتِ عضله هات میشی 💪🏻✨️ ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
نتیجه فکر کردنات چی شده ؟!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سلام 👋🏻😁 یه سوالِ مهم دارم ...🔖 تا حالا به این فکر کردی که ممکنه دلیل اینکه چند ساله رژیم میگیری و رعایت میکنی و دوباره چاق میشی؛ اصلا اراده ضعیف نباشه ؟! ● @farnazsaffarnezhad_official
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @farnazsaffarnezhad_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نتیجه فکر کردنات چی شده ؟!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رژیم لاغری و چاقی | فرناز صفارنژاد” (@farnazsaffarnezhad_official), 277 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farnazsaffarnezhad_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.