3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 08:36
85
-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:01
87
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:42
87
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
34.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (10 February 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
67
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
2m 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
78.2%
👍
13
16.7%
👏
3
3.85%
💯
1
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عصر جمعه؛ آنگونه که خودمان میسازیم...
سالهاست که از غروب جمعه، تصویری خاکستری در ذهنها نقش بسته است؛ انگار این چند ساعت، سهمِ دلتنگیاند و گریزی از آن نیست.
اما من باور دارم هیچ روزی، غمگین به دنیا نمیآید. این ما هستیم که با انتخابهایمان، به لحظهها معنا میدهیم. گاهی یک فنجان چای، چند صفحه کتاب، یک پیادهروی کوتاه یا شنیدن یک پادکست، میتواند حالِ یک عصر را دگرگون کند.
امروز من به پادکستی آموزشی گوش سپردم. می…
یک باور...
همیشه تاریخهای رُند، اتفاقهای رُند و خوشایندی رقم نمیزنند!
امروز هر صفحهای را که باز کردیم، صحبت از ۵/۵/۵ بود؛ از خوشیمنی این تاریخ و انرژی مثبتش میگفتند.
اما سهم ما از این روز خاص، قطع برق و نوسانهایی بود که به چیلر، رسیور، فریزر و آیفون تصویری خانه رحم نکرد!
حرف آخر اینکه خیلی دنبال عددها و تاریخهای خاص نباشیم؛ گاهی یک برق پایدار و یک محافظ خوب، از هر تاریخ رُندی خوشیمنتر است. 🙂
✍فریبا نب…
میراث خاک
پس از رفتن پدر، باد میان علفهای هرز میچرخید و سکوت، تنها وارث آن زمین بود.
هیچکس از سهمش نگفت؛ یکی شخم زد، یکی آب داد، یکی سایه کاشت. فصلها از پی هم رسیدند و خاک، آرامآرام به گنجی بدل شد که ارزشش فراتر از هر سند و نوشتهای بود. آن روز دانستند میراث پدر، چند وجب خاک نبود؛ هنری بود که از چند «من»، یک «ما» ساخته بود.
✍فریبا نبیزاده
#تصویرنویسی
https://t.me/faribanabizadeh
خیاطی وجبی
دامنِ چیتِ گلگلی را که میبینم، هنوز چشمهایم رنگی میشود؛ انگار تکهای از کودکیام دوباره روی زمین پهن شده باشد.
برای مامان کافی بود پارچه را یکبار روی تنم بگیرد. نه الگویی میکشید، نه متر به دست میگرفت. با خنده میگفت: «خیاطیِ من وجبیه.» بعد قیچی را برمیداشت و با اطمینان پارچه را میبرید. من هم کنار دستش میایستادم و میگفتم: «تو فقط خیاطی کن، ظرفها با من.» و او، انگار منتظر شنیدن همین جمله بود، پ…
از مولانا جلالالدین محمد بلخی:
آنچه میجویی، خودِ تویی؛ اما در هیاهو پنهان شدهای.
اندیشهورزی یعنی شنیدن صدای درون در میان شلوغی جهان.
#گزینگویه
https://t.me/faribanabizadeh
فوبیا
جان از کودکی از ارتفاع میترسید؛ ترسی ریشهدار که سالها زندگیاش را محدود کرده بود. نه کوهی میرفت، نه به برجی نزدیک میشد. چند ماه پیش هم شکست عشقی تلخی خورده بود و همین باعث شده بود دوستانش نگران حال او باشند.
یک صبح ابری تصمیم گرفت با ترسش روبهرو شود. بیآنکه به کسی چیزی بگوید، راهی بلندترین برج شهر شد. آسانسور طبقات را پشت سر گذاشت و سرانجام به پشتبام رسید. باد سردی میوزید و شهر زیر پایش چون ماکتی کوچ…
رها
پنجماه و سهروز از رفتنش میگذشت.
رها با چند کتاب زیر بغل و لیوانی قهوه در دست، به درِ چوبی اتاق تکیه داد. در، مثل پیرمردی خسته، نالهای کوتاه سر داد. هنوز گوشهی در، یادداشتی با خط برادرش چسبیده بود: «در را تعمیر کن.»
افسوس! صاحب دستخط رفته بود اما یادداشتش مانده بود.
رها چشم از جمله برنداشت. بخار قهوه آرام بالا میرفت و در روشنای کمرنگ صبح گم میشد. خانه در سکوتی سنگین فرو رفته بود؛ همان سکوتی که پس از …
رقص سما
زیر درخت انار نشست تا دمی بیاساید. چشمش به جامهی سپیدی افتاد که روی بند چون بال ملائک در باد میرقصید.
گویی جان از قفس تناش جدا شد. خودش را در آن جامه دید. بلند شد پاهایش را روی زمین گذاشت. با چشمانی بسته و صورتی رو به آسمان چرخی زد. انگار بین زمین و زمان گم شده بود. دستهایش را گشود و به سوی بینهایت چرخید. چرخشی بیپایان چون گردش فلک. هر چرخ، تسبیحی بود بر وحدت.
دوباره چرخید در سکوتی که سرشار از معنا بود…
👏2❤1👍1
Signed Fariba Nabizadeh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @faribanabizadeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایستگاه اندیشهورزی| فریبا نبیزاده” (@faribanabizadeh), 85 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faribanabizadeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
