Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фантика или типо того

@fanticadadayra

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

444subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847720355
TypeChannel
Username@fanticadadayra
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fanticadadayra

Growth

441444442.513 Aug 2026, 02:02 — 441 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 23:49 — 444 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 02:0213 Aug 2026, 23:49
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 441–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:49444+3
13 Aug 2026, 02:02441first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.3%
avg views ÷ 444 subscribers
Avg views / post
290
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,450
Reactions total228
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

823 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28234.3%
🔥13916.9%
🍓10012.2%
❤‍🔥8910.8%
🥰414.98%
😭344.13%
😁334.01%
💘283.40%
🌭263.16%
🤯222.67%
💋91.09%
💅80.972%
🏆60.729%
🐳20.243%
💯20.243%
💔10.122%
😈10.122%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 823reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fanticadadayra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC164 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

АХАХАХАХХА БЛЯТЬ ЭТО ОХУЕННО БРО ПРОДОЛЖАЙ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА Автор: https://t.me/sayra_ool #Предложка

28🍓8💘3🔥2

Signed Воле₱ия

4 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC301 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Хз,коммунистка какая-то Автор:@suneaterosnova #предложка

❤‍🔥367🍓2🔥2

Signed Воле₱ия

3 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC309 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"2 года мыслей какой бы арт нарисовать этому проекту стоили того" автор: https://t.me/sayra_ool #предложка

46🤯9🍓3💘3🐳1

Signed Воле₱ия

29 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC413 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ну мы? Ну смотрите,ну мы

🥰339🍓5🏆1

Signed Воле₱ия

27 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC263 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @inegalofPhoto

может я и редко публикую посты в Тгк, но за то, сделала коротенькую анимацию с Анис 🤩 📱https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4J1RMS8/ 📱https://youtube.com/shorts/-hrpYblM1fg?si=Iqj0mWZYJN1homkA

🍓216🤯3

Signed Ala Erhan

13 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC472 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

мне так надоели эти комментарии.. Я и так из-за своего голоса комплексую, а тут ещё и вот это. Я понимаю, что из меня озвучкер никакой, хоть и пытаюсь из себя что-то выдавить, но разве нельзя было хотя бы выражаться не так грубо? Хэээх... Плюс я сейчас ещё и не в самом лучшем эмоциональном состоянии, поэтому меня это немного задело. ...Короче, я сейчас возьму, блять, и сделаю короткий ролик об этом, где вообще не

😭32🔥126💯2🍓1💔1

Signed Ala Erhan

12 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC253 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @inegalofPhoto

вышел новый видос ребят :р [как я делаю Инегал] (часть 4) 📱https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSXFdaUqs/ 📱https://youtube.com/shorts/Uy6fxrfBGGA?si=YY32dZxrpPiwLhJD

19🤯5🍓2

Signed Ala Erhan

6 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC434 views35 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"Кто-то реально будет ему донатить?? 💀" Я под столом Автор: @suneaterosnova #предложка

27💅8

Signed Воле₱ия

30 Jun 2026, 17:39 UTC495 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Swap версия уже есть, теперь нужна fell, dance, flower fell, nightmare,error,cross.........

😁298❤‍🔥4🍓2🐳1😈1

Signed Воле₱ия

30 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC513 views60 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

вот и Фанновский мэр)🤩

🍓4111🔥8

Signed Ala Erhan

30 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC453 views56 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Это Анис из альтернативной вселенной, чуть позже наделаю ещё и скетчей с Фанном в качестве МЭРА, поскольку это чертовски весело)

🔥3312🥰8🍓2🌭1

Signed Ala Erhan

30 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC373 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

прекрасный арт Тимп🤩 от прекрасной Эльзы🤩

25❤‍🔥7💘6🍓1🔥1

Signed Ala Erhan

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fanticadadayra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jun 2026, 16:08 UTCAnonymous Poll134 voters

Добавить мишку Фреде в 1 серию?

  1. Да92%
  2. Нет8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,051,825 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фантика или типо того” (@fanticadadayra), 444 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanticadadayra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.