Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фантастический начальник || Вячеслав Бакулин

@fant_boss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

846subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001804503560
TypeChannel
Username@fant_boss
DescriptionАбордажный кот в море текста
Created28 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fant_boss

Growth

8467 Aug 2026, 12:07 — 846 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:19 — 846 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:078 Aug 2026, 01:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 845–847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:19846no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07846first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.4%
avg views ÷ 846 subscribers
Avg views / post
427
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (13 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,707
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
658
Videos
8
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

629 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥20031.8%
17527.8%
💔548.59%
🥰457.15%
😁426.68%
👍386.04%
🎉365.72%
🤯132.07%
❤‍🔥101.59%
👏71.11%
🍓60.954%
🖕20.318%
🤔10.159%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 629reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC189 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @chernym_beloPhoto

Уже в это воскресенье собираемся вместе, чтобы послушать наших любимых авторов, потусить у глэмбота, узнать о новинке Лии Арден, посетить мастер-классы и послушать Marytale! Все подробности программы можно посмотреть здесь. Обязательно зарегистрируйтесь, чтобы пройти на фестиваль! Когда: 9 августа, 18:30 Где: Москва, Мясницкая 42, усадьба Барышникова Регистрация

🔥62

25 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC435 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну и завершая тему ДР и подарков этого года - благодаря чудесной Ане Сешт попали на концерт Imperial Orchestra "Властелин Колец. Симфоническое путешествие в Средиземье". Просто великолепно! В зале были и суровые седые ролевики нашего возраста (я в Нескушник, если что, весной 1995-го попал) с трогательными заколками-листиками на лацканах, и дети в плащах, и девы с ушками. Ну и волшебная музыка Говарда Шора, конечно.

🔥2510👏7🎉1

20 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC544 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мужские подарки-2. Приехали (правильно воспитанные) дети. Привезли красоты. Трубка "Хурин". Сделана на заказ в единственном экземпляре. Чаша - бриар Мундштук - клен, мореный дуб, медь Загубник - камберленд Ложится в руку, как будто точилась под мои пальцы. Прям эстетский экстаз!

🔥3913

20 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC539 views81 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

48 Подарки большому мальчику нынче такие. Лиха беда начало, что называется.) Спасибо всем, кто был и остаётся рядом, это важно. Ну а я просто продолжаю делать то, что у меня все ещё получается. Место встречи - неизменно - книги. Пошелестим? 😉

🥰37🎉2911❤‍🔥4

6 Jun 2026, 10:24 UTC744 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лениво, но планомерно, продолжаю каталогизировать библиотеку. Беда в том, что постоянно что-то докупается или доиздается, поэтому ощущение, что момента "вот теперь всё забил" не настанет никогда. Но я не сдаюсь (хоть впереди ещё 2 немаленьких шкафа" 😆

🔥385👍1

5 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC666 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что ж, ИИ-анализ вновь пробивает дно... "Данная фраза, произнесенная Сюэ Фэньло, содержит негативную оценку и дискриминацию в отношении проституток..." 😭

😁38

16 May 2026, 19:45 UTC887 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Неожиданно пришло на ум название триллера (или драмы): "Бегущий под лезвие бритвы". Настроение субботним вечером, конечно... 😆

👍15🔥5😁4

9 May 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,130 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Будем помнить. Будем жить.

🔥414🍓1

23 Apr 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,760 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С праздником, все причастные! Защиты, все нуждающиеся! 🚀

34👍11🔥10🎉6❤‍🔥1

8 Apr 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,140 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

К НонФикшн готовы! Уже завтра начнется движ. Сам в этот раз, увы, на РосКоне, но постарались с командой, чтобы вы остались довольны. Ждём вас!

28🔥17

25 Mar 2026, 07:52 UTC690 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Катя нереально крутая. Пожалуй, самый публикуемый сейчас на английском языке российский писатель-фантаст, таланту которого отдают должное множество мировых звезд. Если не читали - срочно исправляйтесь!)

16

25 Mar 2026, 07:52 UTC942 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anyret_a_kPhoto

Привет, меня зовут Катерина. Я писатель, иллюстратор и хтонический робокот. Я по-прежнему рисую каждый день, хотя в последнее время скорее по штриху-другому, чем по целому мышкозавру. Ещё я каждый день пишу, и как оказалось, это проверенный способ написать роман (что я и сделала). Работа хтоноробокотом отъедает львиную долю моей жизни, но она же обеспечивает прокорм мне и настоящему коту Чехову. Чехов не просто так н

18

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fant_boss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 693,816 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фантастический начальник || Вячеслав Бакулин” (@fant_boss), 846 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fant_boss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.