Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ˋˏ fannd ᩚˎˊ˗

@fanndart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

532subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001813439052
TypeChannel
Username@fanndart
Description❗️Иногда 🔞 (`・ω・´)❗️ ✨Я fannd или просто Ника — гейм-дизайнер с дипломом-подставкой под чай ☕ и фриланс-художница ✸ По всем вопросам пишите в ДМ
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fanndart

Growth

5326 Aug 2026, 18:34 — 532 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:45 — 532 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:346 Aug 2026, 18:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 531–533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:45532no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:34532first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
200.7%
avg views ÷ 532 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held13 (15 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total10,676
Reactions total460
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
741
Videos
8
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

502 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535937277592654767815631.1%
custom 535032337002817867111522.9%
custom 53574154304807351267514.9%
💋418.17%
🦄407.97%
custom 5208740791022810345336.57%
custom 5240297307315921185275.38%
custom 5449639549535798599132.59%
custom 537745566627949716720.398%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 502reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC119 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

12-ая атака, это ревендж на мою подружку jacqjohnsonart! Уже третий раз рисую ее прекрасного мальчика 🌸 Забавно вышло, что мы рисуем друг другу наших персонажей с говорящими именами. У нее Prosperity, у меня Sentinel ✦ #artfight #art

custom 535741543048073512619custom 535032337002817867111custom 52087407910228103457

28 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC252 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как изменился мой стиль за 2023—2026 🐈❤️ У меня был небольшой вдохновляющий тред о красоте и изменчивости человеческого искусства/творчества, но он на английском. Если вам интересно, то я переведу его на русский и сюда, иностранцем зашло читать 🥰 ✦ #art

custom 535937277592654767828🦄9custom 53574154304807351265custom 52402973073159211851custom 53503233700281786711

25 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,070 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Были сегодня с моей хорошей @rensan125 на Пикфест! Послушали вживую бардов с волынкой, собрали бумажных кукол и купили красивые кружки 🤗 Все такие красивые ходили на мероприятия, атмосфера была очень крутой 🩷

custom 524029730731592118513custom 53574154304807351267custom 53593727759265476785

25 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC539 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

13-ая атака, и это ревендж для @retheshal с ее Мелисандрой! Хлебом не корми, дай только порисовать красивых персонажей с милыми ушками и носиком 🥰 И напоминаю вам про ✨самопиар✨в закрепе! Зовите знакомых тоже, мы будем начинать постить подборки сегодня-завтра 🥰 ✦ #artfight #art

custom 535937277592654767830custom 535032337002817867112custom 54496395495357985998custom 52402973073159211851

24 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC262 views64 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, мои хорошики и новенькие хорошики! 🐾 Сколько же талантливых людей в комментариях, не устаю любоваться вашими артами 🤍 Надо познакомиться с новенькими! Я fannd, это мой первый самопиар совместно с другими прекрасными художницами ✨ В основном я рисую своих фентези ОС и заказные работы как фуллтайм фрилансер. Буду рада всем, кто останется со мной после ивента, чтобы вместе смотреть на красивых девочек и м

custom 535937277592654767834custom 535741543048073512617custom 52087407910228103458custom 53503233700281786713custom 53774556662794971672

23 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈6,050 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✨🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 3000+ аудитории 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐Самопиар завершен!⭐

custom 535032337002817867116🦄9custom 53574154304807351268custom 53593727759265476781

22 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC350 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Внимание! Красивая тетя в очках и с тростью. Спасибо за внимание! 💵 ✦ #artfight #art

custom 535032337002817867135custom 535937277592654767820custom 535741543048073512610custom 54496395495357985991

20 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC294 views62 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Подписчики из бск захватили этот арт всеми возможными способами, вам тоже советую 🌸 А если без шуток, то очень довольна результатом! ✦ #art

💋41custom 520874079102281034511custom 53574154304807351267custom 53503233700281786712custom 54496395495357985991

17 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC323 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна ревендж атака номер 8, на smittensable! Люблю козликов, и птичек, а этот молодой человек все вместе 🥰 ✦ #artfight #art

custom 535032337002817867121custom 535937277592654767815custom 54496395495357985993

16 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC417 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ревендж атака на мою хорошую @kjetll_art с ее Верми 🖤🖤🌟 Уже седьмая атака по счету! ✦ #artfight #art

custom 535937277592654767823custom 53503233700281786718custom 52087407910228103457

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @fanndart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 111,280 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ˋˏ fannd ᩚˎˊ˗” (@fanndart), 532 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanndart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.