Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fᥲᥒ ᧐f ᴛɦᥱ ᥱκsᴛrᥲsᥱᥒ's δᥲᴛᴛᥣᥱ(канал закрыт)

Channel

Fᥲᥒ ᧐f ᴛɦᥱ ᥱκsᴛrᥲsᥱᥒ's δᥲᴛᴛᥣᥱ(канал закрыт)

@fanexstrasenoV

Not marked by Telegram, checked 28 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002230094138
TypeChannel
Username@fanexstrasenoV
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fanexstrasenoV

Growth

10928 Aug 2026, 00:30 — 109 subscribers28 Aug 2026, 03:23 — 109 subscribers28 Aug 2026, 00:3028 Aug 2026, 03:23
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 03:23109no change
28 Aug 2026, 00:30109first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

198 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54228668794861273024522.7%
🤡3718.7%
🤮2412.1%
2110.6%
👎147.07%
custom 5215477039204688953126.06%
🍓126.06%
🔥105.05%
custom 532373241145486372384.04%
👍84.04%
💩42.02%
🥰21.01%
💅10.505%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2025 to 3 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 May 2025, 15:57 UTC701 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitvakoldynov668Video

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 анонс шоу мастер игры где приняли участие наши экстрасенсы.🟣 битва колдунов - подписаться.✌️

5👍1

20 Apr 2025, 14:11 UTC900 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Кто был лучшим вчера?

  1. Олег Шепс🪞25%
  2. Ангелина Изосимова👩64%
  3. Артём Краснов🧛11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52154770392046889539👎3custom 53237324114548637233🍓1

20 Apr 2025, 14:11 UTC750 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

С праздником Пасхи всех! 🎁🧺

🥰2👎1

19 Apr 2025, 08:43 UTC726 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Итоги зрительского голосования: 👠 - 5.2 😈 - 8.2 👨 - 7.9

👎5custom 54228668794861273024🤮2

19 Apr 2025, 05:22 UTC680 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://russia-tv.online/tnt?region=25 В 11:30 по мск выпуск начинается на этом сайте❤️

custom 54228668794861273024👎1

19 Apr 2025, 05:21 UTC658 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Кто ваш фаворит сегодня?

  1. Олег Шепс🪞40%
  2. Артём Краснов🧛16%
  3. Ангелина Изосимова👩45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍2👎1

16 Apr 2025, 00:34 UTC504 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @dsimakowaVideo

🎀АНОНС 14 ВЫПУСКА БС🎀 Тройка: 😕 Олег Шепс 🧛Артём Краснов ❤️ Ангелина Изосимова

🔥10

14 Apr 2025, 10:22 UTC356 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @alexandershepsPhoto

«В тёмные времена» 🩸 Когда садится солнце и тревога, Вокруг безмолвие в сомнениях души, Мы умоляем, призываем, просим Бога И ловим крики первородной тишины… Во мраке тяжко, одиноко и так страшно, Друзей немного, мало искренней любви, Нам вдруг становится во истину так важно, Кто не забудет нашей преданной руки… Во времена ночного отдаления от света, Мы ищем искру среди тусклой суеты, Кричим в толпу и остаёмся без отв

custom 54228668794861273027

13 Apr 2025, 07:55 UTC345 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Юлий считает Череватого и Левина своими главными соперниками в БС👀

🤡15custom 52154770392046889533custom 53237324114548637232custom 54228668794861273022👍1

13 Apr 2025, 07:31 UTC319 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Лина Джебисашвили поддержала Юлия Котова🔔

🤡22🤮6👎3👍2💅1💩1

12 Apr 2025, 17:07 UTC368 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня снимают 🟧🟧 выпуск БС Тройка: Максим Левин👨‍🦳, Виктория Райдос👩 и Юлий Котов🐱 Максим в этом туре заменяет Александра, который лежит в больнице. Скорее всего, Шепсу засчитают баллы за 10 выпуск, в таком случае у всех экстрасенсов снова будет равное число испытаний❤

custom 5422866879486127302131

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fanexstrasenoV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Apr 2025, 14:11 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

Кто был лучшим вчера?

  1. Олег Шепс🪞25%
  2. Ангелина Изосимова👩64%
  3. Артём Краснов🧛11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Apr 2025, 05:21 UTCAnonymous Poll116 voters

Кто ваш фаворит сегодня?

  1. Олег Шепс🪞40%
  2. Артём Краснов🧛16%
  3. Ангелина Изосимова👩45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Apr 2025, 16:55 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

Рады ли вы приходу Юлия в БС?

  1. Да30%
  2. Нет70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Apr 2025, 14:25 UTCAnonymous Poll112 voters

Кто был сегодня лучшим?

  1. Максим Левин👨‍🦳42%
  2. Влад Череватый⭐️45%
  3. Ольга Якубович👠13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2025 to 3 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Битва экстрасенсов - Дилаурентис
@dilawrentisss · 44,741
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fᥲᥒ ᧐f ᴛɦᥱ ᥱκsᴛrᥲsᥱᥒ's δᥲᴛᴛᥣᥱ(канал закрыт)” (@fanexstrasenoV), 109 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fanexstrasenoV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.