Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Семейная стратегия

Channel

Семейная стратегия

@familystrategy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

858subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001628911851
TypeChannel
Username@familystrategy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/familystrategy

Growth

858859858.59 August 2026 — 859 subscribers9 August 2026 — 859 subscribers16 August 2026 — 858 subscribers9 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 858–859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 09:05858-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:22859no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:46859first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 858 subscribers
Avg views / post
214
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total641
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
2m 24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12651.9%
🔥7330.0%
👍135.35%
💯83.29%
😁83.29%
👏52.06%
🎅31.23%
20.823%
10.412%
👀10.412%
👨‍💻10.412%
💅10.412%
🤝10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC188 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Читаю книгу "Перевал в середине пути" (про кризис среднего возраста). Там много и про семейные отношения. Приложу несколько интересных цитат. Современная культура часто демонстрирует синонимичность брака и романтической любви. А ведь немалую часть истории брак служил средством сохранения и передачи ценностей, этнической принадлежности, религиозных традиций и власти. Браки по договоренности отличались большей прочнос

👍64💯4

3 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC224 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну и давайте докручу мысль из предыдущего поста. Иногда (!) семья не может двигаться в стратегии, потому что ее сдерживает якорь эмоциональных затыков. Например, темы развития, честного самоанализа, каких-то необходимых доработок, планов – сама эта идея может вызывать внутри тревогу и неприятие, вызывать какие-то флешбеки и [казалось бы, нерелевантные] эмоциональные переживания. Это происходит по каким-то внутренним

🔥51

3 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC229 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Развитие невозможно без эмоциональной стабильности Приведу два не семейных жизненных примера. В конце поста свяжу эти примеры с семейной жизнью. Пример 1 Хожу в одно предпринимательское сообщество (для общения и развития). Сошлись там с одним производителем мебели. Дела у него идут в целом неплохо, но и улучшить есть много чего. Решение – ищет, радары – настроены, слышать – готов. Итог: как-то мы с ним сошлись, пос

16🔥4

27 Jun 2026, 18:40 UTC481 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Про следующие поколения Занимаясь семейным стратегированием, естественно, применяю всё на себе. Укладывая сейчас детей спать, в очередной раз с некоторым переживанием осознаю, насколько мало можно сделать за одно поколение: что-то осознать, базово картировать, затем начать сдвигать какие-то культурные основы семьи, закладывать какие-то ценности, пытаться повернуть корабль хотя бы на несколько градусов в нужную сторо

🔥1514💯3

25 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC446 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На днях провел встречу в Казани. Рассказал о командности семьи – какие уровни в ней можно выделить, как их развивать и так далее. Участники попались любознательные, вечер получился увлекательный. Было много положительной обратной связи, но одно высказывание мне запало в душу больше всего. Одна из участниц [пока не замужем / ~ студентка / ~ наверно хорошее образование / ~ потенциально успешная селфмейд] сказала прим

🔥229👏4

18 Jun 2026, 09:57 UTC541 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

23 июня встречаемся в Казани, друзья!

2

18 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC499 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vzivuyPhoto

ЛЕКЦИЯ от ИЛЬНУРА МИФТАХОВА "КАК СЕМЬЯ МОЖЕТ СТАТЬ ХОРОШЕЙ КОМАНДОЙ?" 23 июня мы поговорим про пять уровней семейной командности – от самой слабой до самой шикарной. Участники встречи смогут определить свой уровень командности в паре и понять, как им в этом развиваться. Ведущий: Ильнур Мифтахов ◽️ автор и разработчик методики семейного стратегирования @familystrategy ◽️ консультант по трансформации образовательных

12🔥6

5 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC908 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Семьёй невозможно управлять. Семья либо сама складывается, либо нет." "Главное любить друг друга – остальное приложится." "Такие вещи не планируются." Нет. Семья – живая система. У неё есть устоявшийся уклад. Этот уклад можно усиливать / ослаблять / трансформировать качественными решениями. Если специально не управлять семьёй – решения всё равно будут приниматься. Просто случайно :)

142💯1🔥1

28 May 2026, 12:43 UTC576 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Профориентация и семейная стратегия Дорогие друзья, публикую видеозапись нашего эфира про профориентацию с Мариной Пискарёвой. Описание эфира было здесь. 📹: Запись эфира в YouTube Получился интересный разговор. Вы как родители и семейные стратеги можете набрать для себя в этом разговоре много знаний и рабочих принципов.

🔥3🎅1

28 May 2026, 12:43 UTC466 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

👆 Мои хорошие друзья проводят замечательные лагерные смены в Казани. Смело рекомендую, и старшую дочь туда же намереваемся вести.

👍3

28 May 2026, 12:42 UTC452 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @jgetkznPhoto

🏕Лето, когда ребёнок скажет: «Смотри, я сделал сам!» Каникулы - это время отдыхать от школы. Но отдыхать - не значит сутками сидеть в телефоне. В летнем лагере J-GET мы создали среду, где дети пробуют новое, ошибаются без страха, находят друзей и прокачивают самостоятельность. 🚀Этим летом мы подготовили 12 уникальных направлений: от программирования и инженерии до походов, языков и спорта. Выбирайте то, что зажжет г

🔥2🎅1

22 May 2026, 10:42 UTC495 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Друзья, приглашаю вас на интересное обсуждение 👍

👍4🎅1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @familystrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 999,751 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Семейная стратегия” (@familystrategy), 858 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/familystrategy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.