Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 593–610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 13:36
595
-2
9 Sept 2026, 11:57
597
-1
31 Aug 2026, 12:47
598
-3
24 Aug 2026, 04:13
601
-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:52
602
-6
8 Aug 2026, 03:04
608
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:13
608
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
940 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
501
53.3%
🙏
198
21.1%
🥰
78
8.30%
😭
40
4.26%
🔥
34
3.62%
😁
32
3.40%
👍
23
2.45%
😢
20
2.13%
☃
5
0.532%
💘
4
0.426%
👏
3
0.319%
💔
2
0.213%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Еду и просто реву от счастья…
Думаю про отношения..
А ведь это не про «когда всем одинаково удобно».
Отношения — это почти всегда про компромисс.
Когда люди идут рядом, даже если их путь оказывается сложнее, чем они ожидали.
Андрей знал, что тема потерянных животных для меня стала очень острой в последние пол года.
И разрешил забрать домой ту, чьи глаза мне так напомнили мою Асю❤️❤️❤️
Сегодня в городе Электростали на пересечении улицы Советской и Красной была найдена собака. Мне прислали фото и видео. Думали, что Ася. Но оказался кобелем. Бегал по проезжей части. Чуть не попал под колеса. Ребятам удалось перекрыть движение и словить. Забрали к себе домой. Кинули клич во все группы. Но хозяин пока не отозвался.
Давайте поможем мальчику вернуться домой🙏
Мне сейчас позвонила девушка. В Ногинске, в районе Благовещения, в лесу бегает собачка. Девушка её заметила, стала звать: «Ася, Ася!!»
Собачка подошла довольно близко, все понюхала, но в руки не далась.
Девушка позвонила мне, думала, что это Ася.
По фото не похожа, но она ведь точно чья-та потеряшка.
Мы еще летом этот район плотно прочесывали, потому что там была замечена похожая собака.
Хотела попросить маму доехать…
Буся сейчас на передержке у Лены на даче.
Она сыта, в тепле и безопасности.
Планировали её привить и найти ей дом.
Но вот о чем подумали..
А вдруг она убежала, её искали, но не смогли тогда найти?
Вдруг её до сих пор ждут родители также, как и я свою Асю😭
Одной мне точно трудно будет перешерстить все группы за такой, довольно приличный по времени отрезок.
Но вместе мы сила❤️❤️❤️
Саша позвал собачку, она как рванула на нас
Он подумал, что это безобидный золотистый ретривер
А оказалась кавказская овчарка. Её еще называют волкодав или медвежья собака. Две-три такие собаки в группе могут завалить медведя🤣🤣🤣
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @family_no_instruction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нам очень интересно посмотреть какая она стала в домашних условиях. А вам?
Да❤️99%
Нет💔0%
Мне всё равно 😒0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 28 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Семья без инструкции” (@family_no_instruction), 595 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/family_no_instruction.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.