Channel

Канал по генетической генеалогии от Familio

@familiodna

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

815subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001404798495
Type	Channel
Username	@familiodna
Created	30 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 September 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/familiodna

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4 measurements spanning 28 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 809–816 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
4 Sept 2026, 22:41	815	+3
21 Aug 2026, 16:09	812	+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:33	810	no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:50	810	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

342 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	101	29.5%
🔥	84	24.6%
👍	80	23.4%
🎉	34	9.94%
🍾	14	4.09%
❤‍🔥	5	1.46%
🤝	5	1.46%
👌	3	0.877%
🕊	3	0.877%
🙏	3	0.877%
👏	2	0.585%
😘	2	0.585%
⚡	1	0.292%
🆒	1	0.292%
🏆	1	0.292%
👨‍💻	1	0.292%
🤔	1	0.292%
🤩	1	0.292%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.