Уже сегодня, Предпродажу закроем в 20.00
custom 52873294325901264182

Channel
@familiarpeopleX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002868751155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @familiarpeopleX |
| Description | www.familiarpeople.ru Команда музыкальных единомышлеников Объединяем людей и музыку |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/familiarpeopleX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 157 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 157 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
142 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5287329432590126418 | 75 | 52.8% | |
| custom 5291927504318139609 | 37 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5296662495308559191 | 17 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5296756031106329491 | 9 | 6.34% | |
| custom 5213475017509062564 | 4 | 2.82% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @familiarpeopleX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 28 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Уже сегодня, Предпродажу закроем в 20.00
custom 52873294325901264182
Ребята, подготовка полным ходом. Свет и звук почти готовы Ждем вас в Фабрике 28 февраля Старт в 23.30 Билеты: www.familiarpeople.ru
custom 52919275043181396096custom 52966624953085591914
Почти 100% готовности
custom 52873294325901264188custom 52919275043181396095
Вчера ночью монтировали свет 💡 Ждем вас в субботу Билеты: www.familiarpeople.ru
custom 52873294325901264188custom 52919275043181396095custom 52134750175090625643
Друзья, участились случаи мошенничества. За одного из победителей приз пытался получить мошенник. Будьте бдительны.
custom 52873294325901264183
🥉 3 место @dora_cherryy 🥈 2 место @IgorKoryakovskiy 🥇 1 место @katiaplaneta 🎉 Поздравляем, победителей Для получения призов, свяжитесь с @mineevx @Oktodj
custom 52873294325901264184custom 52966624953085591913custom 52919275043181396092
Осталось 15 минут. В файле список участников с номерами
custom 52966624953085591915
1 цифра - депозит в баре на 3000 2 цифра - стол на 2х + депозит в баре на 5000 3 цифра - главный приз iphone 16
custom 52966624953085591914custom 52967560311063294912
Мы присвоили каждому участнику, кто принял участие в конкурсе и подписан на все наши ресурсы номер. Участников получилось 62. В 22.30 рандомайзер выберет 3х победителей нашего конкурса. Желаем удачи.
custom 52873294325901264188custom 52967560311063294913
Сегодня в 22.30 мы определим победителя.
custom 52873294325901264184custom 52919275043181396092custom 52966624953085591911
Друзья, привет 🙌 Уже завтра мы определим 3х победителей. К главному призу мы решили доложить пару бонусов. Кто еще не успел, купить билет, еще можно успеть. Билеты: www.familiarpeople.ru
custom 52873294325901264185custom 52919275043181396094custom 52967560311063294912
Друзья привет. Уже в эту пятницу мы объявим трех победителей. Если есть желание принять участие в конкурсе, условия выше 🥇 1 место: iPhone 16 128 гб 🥈 2 место: стол на двоих + депозит в баре на 5000 рублей 🥉 3 место: депозит в баре на 3000 рублей Билеты: www.familiarpeople.ru
custom 52873294325901264188custom 52919275043181396093custom 52967560311063294912
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @familiarpeopleX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,087,201 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@familiarpeopleX named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“familiar people” (@familiarpeopleX), 157 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/familiarpeopleX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.