Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fame

@famemsk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

757subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649093849
TypeChannel
Username@famemsk
DescriptionCan’t Stop Fanatics 🥷 Связь: @e5horses
Created26 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/famemsk

Growth

7576 Aug 2026, 14:07 — 757 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:52 — 757 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:076 Aug 2026, 15:52
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 756–758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 15:52757no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:07757first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.2%
avg views ÷ 757 subscribers
Avg views / post
426
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (15 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,979
Reactions total217
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,650
Videos
617
Links
261

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

390 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13634.9%
custom 52084995899544213446015.4%
🔥5213.3%
👍4210.8%
🙏235.90%
custom 5345773285969768262184.62%
custom 5435999158605464007153.85%
👀143.59%
🥰123.08%
💘82.05%
💅41.03%
custom 528763219342474359420.513%
custom 544969261815169599720.513%
custom 546081593061332660410.256%
❤‍🔥10.256%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC111 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ultras_actionPhoto

Московский "Спартак" объявил о переходе Мирлинда Даку. Он станет первым косоваром / албанцем в истории клуба. Даку родился в Гнилане. Город с 1999 года находится под контролем косовских албанцев: на стыке веков там были уничтожены все сербские памятники, а на месте монумента национальному герою Сербии Лазарю теперь стоит памятник террористов из Армии освобождения Косова. В марте 2004 года из Гнилане были выгнаны все

👀5💅3custom 52876321934247435942custom 53457732859697682621

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC198 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ibns1924

Мечты сбываются! Кроме уже понятных выездов, в этом году случится ещё один интереснейший вояж — ЕВРОвыезд в братскую Беларусь! Жодинское «Торпедо» в этом году празднует 65-летие, и в честь этого события они решили провести настоящий гала-матч. Для такого дела пригласили лучший клуб из возможных — «Торпедо Москва»! В том же историческом 1961 году, 14 сентября, был собран первый самосвал БелАЗ-540, который, кстати,

custom 53457732859697682628🔥21💘1

3 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC579 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

25👍7custom 53457732859697682626🙏3custom 54496926181516959972❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC292 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @crazynorthPhoto

Мы выражаем полное несогласие с потенциальным трансфером Мирлинда Даку в наш клуб. Опираясь на бэкграунд албанца, мы предвидим череду проблем внутри коллектива, который сейчас способен решать серьезные задачи. Вне зависимости от бойкота Fan ID на матчах основы, мы поддерживаем братский народ Сербии, и наше отношение к усташам, а особенно к шиптарям и косоварам, остается неизменным — таких игроков в нашей команде нико

23custom 520849958995442134415👀9💅1

2 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC493 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 520849958995442134426🥰12💘7custom 54608159306133266041

28 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC581 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @torpedomoscow_fcPhoto

🚌 Едем в Тулу! Следующий матч проведём против тульского «Арсенала» — уже в это воскресенье, 2 августа в 15:00! 🔥 — буду с вами в Туле! Информация о билетах будет доступна в ближайшее время. ⚪️ Наш канал в МАХ

🔥136custom 53457732859697682623

22 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC725 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброго дня! Кто что просил привезти из Белграда, продублируйте ещё раз. Пишите заранее, на месте заявки не принимаются 😃 До 20августа включительно

28👍4🙏2

13 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC943 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥26custom 520849958995442134419custom 543599915860546400715

11 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC857 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В Питере - жара.. 🥵

25🔥11

10 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC670 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ultras_actionPhoto

10 июля 2010 года в центре Москвы был убит 23-летний фанат "Спартака" Юрий Волков.

🙏185

5 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC925 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сектор: 205 Промокод: CRV-G26W

12👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @famemsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,220,297 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fame” (@famemsk), 757 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/famemsk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.