привет великий и любимый фобкф я прошлый владелец, узнаваемая как клэнн (но щас я блудибан) и я ожила через пол мать его года, если вам все еще интересно, то я создаю новый кф и буду рада если вы подпишитесь (рубрики будут)
🙏16❤7🤨3🍓1😭1

Channel
@falloutboyconf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
391subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002386240336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @falloutboyconf |
| Description | бот для тейков - @fodCONF_bot 04.11.2024 28 июня 2025 год - восстание фобовцев во главе с клэнн |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/falloutboyconf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 391 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 391 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (7 January 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 234 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
427 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5278280572152601666 | 61 | 14.3% | |
| 😭 | 58 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 11.0% | |
| 🍓 | 27 | 6.32% | |
| 😨 | 19 | 4.45% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 3.75% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 3.51% | |
| 🎄 | 12 | 2.81% | |
| custom 5280635257907861518 | 11 | 2.58% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 1.87% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 1.87% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 0.937% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.937% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.703% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.468% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.468% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.234% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.234% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
привет великий и любимый фобкф я прошлый владелец, узнаваемая как клэнн (но щас я блудибан) и я ожила через пол мать его года, если вам все еще интересно, то я создаю новый кф и буду рада если вы подпишитесь (рубрики будут)
🙏16❤7🤨3🍓1😭1
всем привет ждите дроп
😨10❤3🍓1🔥1
Signed Тøри (i promise) |-/
отдам кф в добрые лапки, цена договорная ВАЖНО! тема кф должна быть строго такой же @obsessioncore
😭51❤9😨9💔8🎉2🔥1
Signed ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎clanny afk
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 «это правда, что ты отказался подписывать “сиську”, потому что это шло вразрез с твоей совестью, хаха» Патрик: «Да, я не целуюсь и не подписываю сиськи и задницы; Моя мама феминистка, и я стараюсь не способствовать объективации. » 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 FALL OUT BOY #перевод
custom 527828057215260166632❤16🍓8custom 52806352579078615184💘2🔥1
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Патрик: «То самое время. Вопросы и ответы…» «*отпускается на одно колено* будь моим котом» Патрик: «*Каким-то образом превращается в кошку* Что за эффект? [перевод с мяуканья] » 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 FALL OUT BOY #перевод
🔥15❤6😍3custom 52806352579078615183
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 «ты тайно танцуешь тверк?» Патрик: «Перестань наблюдать за мной!» 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 FALL OUT BOY #перевод
❤16🍓4custom 52782805721526016663⚡2custom 52806352579078615182
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 «как ты общаешься с плохими людьми?» Патрик: «Нет плохих людей, есть только плохие решения. Помните об этом, и вы сможете справиться со многим» 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 FALL OUT BOY #перевод
❤14❤🔥4🔥2😍2🍓1custom 52782805721526016661custom 52806352579078615181
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 «ты безвкусный, я так ненавижу тебя!» Патрик: «Но я так полон любви к тебе.И солнечного света, и брызг. И убийственной ярости.» 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 FALL OUT BOY #перевод
🔥12😭6❤4🍓2😘1custom 52782805721526016661
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
хотите перевод твитов патрика стампа как в старые добрые
🥰15💘4custom 52782805721526016664
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
Хай конфа! Както я расстроилась что почти нет тгк с фобами, но вот вас нашла:3 такие вот штуки нарисовались с Патриком тгк овсянка . ꒰ #тейк | @fodCONF_bot . ꒱ ݁
❤25🔥5☃4custom 52782805721526016663🍓2💘1
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
вот тут можно все все найти почитать и ваще это будет для вас хорошим стартом
❤4🔥2custom 52782805721526016662
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
здрасте я только недавно начала слушать и вникать во всю движуху что происходила с фобами но меня уже завалило мемами про питки мастерпост и про 13летний марафон песен про микки ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ОБЪЯСНИТЕ ШО У НИХ БЫЛО ВООБЩЕ ИЛИ ГДЕ ОБ ЭТОМ УЗНАТЬ . ꒰ #тейк | @fodCONF_bot . ꒱ ݁
🍓6❤4custom 52806352579078615181
Signed ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎clanny ⥂ 𝖽𝗂𝖾
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @falloutboyconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 685,948 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@falloutboyconf named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЗАГРУЗКА ˓˓fall out boy ✶ ᴄᴏnfᴇssiᴏn” (@falloutboyconf), 391 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/falloutboyconf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.