Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Война с фейками. Астрахань

@fakefact_30

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

430subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431692464
TypeChannel
Username@fakefact_30
DescriptionКанал с объективной информацией, основными фейками и их опровержением.
Created13 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fakefact_30

Growth

4307 Aug 2026, 19:50 — 430 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 430 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:508 Aug 2026, 05:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 429–431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:18430no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:50430first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 12 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 430 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held6 (12 December 202525 July 2026)
Views total51
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
543
Videos
100
Links
336

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

Фейк: Минкульт и партия «Единая Россия» запустили конкурс для детей «Бумажный флот Великой России». Об этом сообщают украинские телеграм-каналы, прилагая скриншот соответствующего документа. Правда: Распространяемый документ — фальшивка, что подтвердили в ЦИК «Единой России». На официальных ресурсах партии закономерно нет ни малейшего упоминания об «акции». О подделке красноречиво говорит ряд признаков: 🟢в тексте

1 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC87 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

Команда «Войны с фейками» нашла очередной сайт, посвященный дефициту бензина, после блокировки страницы, созданной ЦИПсО. Внести данные на нем может кто угодно, а АЗС с бензином помечают как закрытые. Рассказываем кто и зачем его создал, а также на что обратить внимание, чтоб не попасть под влияние мошенников и ЦИПсО. На фоне проблем с топливом в России появились ресурсы, которые якобы «помогают» мониторить обстано

3 Jun 2026, 06:06 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

Возмездие: какие объекты украинского ВПК поразили ВС РФ Эти удары стали ответом на террористические атаки против гражданских объектов в нашей стране. Такие удары подрывают украинский ВПК и лишают киевский режим возможностей терроризировать россиян. ✅ Подписаться на Войну с фейками 📲 Подписаться на нас в МАХ

29 May 2026, 05:45 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

«Вам нужно сфотографировать надгробие бойца ВС РФ, погибшего на СВО»: россиянам начали предлагать необычную подработку. Легкий заработок грозит обернуться для исполнителя тяжелыми последствиями, предупреждают в МВД России. Злоумышленники находят в сети потенциальных жертв, которым нужно выполнить ряд нехитрых действий: отправиться на кладбище, найти там могилы российских военнослужащих, сделать фотографию или видео

15 Jan 2026, 12:36 UTC265 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

Ценный урок о том, как важно проверять поступающую информацию и не спешить публиковать «сенсации», получили многие администраторы телеграм-каналов. Что произошло? В среду, 14 января 2026 на специализированном хакерском форуме появился пользователь с ником CamelliaBtw — якобы впервые зарегистрировавшись на этом ресурсе. Едва появившись, он опубликовал сенсационную новость: личные данные миллионов россиян утекли из м

12 Dec 2025, 05:32 UTC288 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @warfakesPhoto

Фейк: Хакеры взломали серверы разработчика Реестра воинского учета, все данные стерты. Такие сообщения распространяются в телеграм-каналах. Правда: Информация о взломе Реестра и утечек из него — фейк. Сервис функционирует в штатном режиме, а утечки из него исключены, подчеркнули в Минобороны России. В ведомстве отметили, что ресурс неоднократно подвергался хакерским атакам, однако все они успешно пресекаются. Тира

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @fakefact_30. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Война с фейками. Астрахань” (@fakefact_30), 430 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fakefact_30.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.