Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

«ФАИДА» — الفائدة

@faida35

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

302subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002164612190
TypeChannel
Username@faida35
Description{ФАИДА} — Польза от источников знания - Свет Хадисов - Глубина Книг - Польза для студента -Оживление сердец с чтением Корана. Обратная связь с админом @Abu_Muaz35
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/faida35

Growth

3026 Aug 2026, 19:45 — 302 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:32 — 302 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:456 Aug 2026, 22:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 301–303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:32302no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:45302first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.7%
avg views ÷ 302 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,008
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
150
Videos
34
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52582161685728757623723.7%
😭3623.1%
👍2113.5%
custom 57944218416783078471811.5%
1811.5%
🔥1710.9%
custom 518618094272459653474.49%
custom 521312352597550582021.28%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC55 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♦️Сегодня, находясь в медресе после экзамена, я решил с братом выехать в город, чтобы подготовиться к следующему экзамену в центральной мечети. Мы заказали такси. ♦️Когда машина приехала, таксист, увидев меня с книгой, сразу спросил: «На каком ты курсе?» Я ответил, что перехожу на второй курс. Затем он спросил: «Что сейчас делаете?» Я сказал, что готовимся к пересдачам. ♦️Услышав это, он заметил: «У настоящего студ

🔥86😭5

3 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC74 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📝Подготовка к новому учебному году ▪️Собрались все шейхи для того чтобы сделать этот год для нас лучше. Каждый высказал своё мнение относительно учёбы. ▪️Были предложены новые методы обучения. Теперь дело за нами — приложить все усилия и оправдать их доверие. ▪️Да хранит Аллах наших учителей и сделает этот год приносящим пользу для нашей уммы!

4😭2👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♦️Наконец-то я собрал полную коллекцию книг шейха Али ат-Тантави в переводе нашего брата. ♦️Именно этих трудов так не хватало в моей читательской коллекции. Совсем скоро сяду за их чтение.

👍3

31 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔹Осталось ровно месяц, а выполненных дел мало. Прочитанных книг — одна (маленькая). 🔹А что ты успел сделать за лето?

🔥2😭1

22 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC156 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ansabsiraPhoto

🌱 Хвала Аллаху Господу миров. По милости и содействию Аллаха, сайт «Родословные из сиры Пророка, ﷺ» теперь доступен на четырех языках, что делает этот цифровой справочник более доступным и расширяет его пользу для исследователей, студентов и всех интересующихся по всему миру. Познакомьтесь с благородной родословной Пророка ﷺ, родословными членов его семьи и его благородных сподвижников, а также с племенами, связанн

15 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC183 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Также есть в пдф формате

🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC179 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♦️Хвала Аллаху за то, что Он дал мне возможность в очередной раз прочитать книгу на летних каникулах и получить от этого пользу. 📕Книга «Разница между наставлением и опозориванием человека» — мы очень нуждаемся в её прочтении, тем более в наше время. ♦️Если кто-то думает, что не сможет её прочитать, то у нашего брата есть по ней уроки. Хуштада | 2026

🔥4

13 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC168 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

♦️Когда долги Мухаммада ибн Сирина (ум. 110 г.х.) были покрыты, а его самого за это посадили в тюрьму, он сказал: ♦️Поистине, я знаю, за какой грех меня постигло это заключение. ♦️Однажды, около сорока лет назад, я опозорил человека, сказав ему: Эй, ты — банкрот! 📕аль-Фарку байна ан-Насыха ва ат-Та’йир

👍51😭1

12 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC177 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔹Зиннира была девочкой-подростком, рабыней язычницы из племени курайш. Она приняла ислам, узнав о Посланнике Аллаха (мир ему и благословение). Хозяйка, разгневавшись, стала мучить её днём и ночью. 🔹Однажды она приказала слугам бить Зинниру по голове, пока та не ослепла. Когда рабыня просила воды, ей издевательски отвечали: «Вода впереди, ищи». Хозяйка насмехалась: «Если твой Господь истинный, попроси Его вернуть зре

7👍2

9 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC188 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹У некоторых саляфов спросили: — Хотел бы ты, чтобы кто-нибудь указал тебе на твои недостатки? ✏️Он ответил: 🔹Если он намерен упрекнуть меня, то нет, я этого не люблю. ✏️Фудайль ибн ‘Ияд сказал: 🔹Верующий — укрывает недостатки других и даёт искренние советы, а грешник — разглашает и злословит. ✏️Также он сказал: 🔹Кто делает замечание своему брату перед людьми, тот тем самым позорит его. 📙аль-Фарку байна Насыха

👍4🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC189 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📜Хочешь убить — убей у этого камня. 🔹У одного человека был старый отец, который не мог сам о себе заботиться. Всё делал сын. 🔹Но однажды он устал от постоянной опеки и задумал убить отца, чтобы избавиться от бремени. 🔹Решившись, он вывел старика в пустыню и посадил у большой каменной глыбы. Отец спросил, что тот задумал. Сын честно ответил: хочет убить, потому что больше не в силах терпеть. 🔹Тогда отец сказал: —

😭5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @faida35. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 131,526 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«ФАИДА» — الفائدة” (@faida35), 302 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faida35.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.