Channel
@fahd_ibn_ala
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
825subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001964936464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fahd_ibn_ala |
| Description | مهتم بعلوم الشرع أصولًا وفروعًا، خائض التراث وناثره، متلبب للشعر الجاهلي. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fahd_ibn_ala |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 825 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 825 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
491 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 435 | 88.6% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 4.28% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 1.43% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 🤪 | 5 | 1.02% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.611% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.407% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.407% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.407% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.407% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.204% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.204% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I’ll be leading this ḥalqah today for converts again tomorrow. I will be continuing our discussion on the nafs, qalb, rūḥ and ʿaql. If you are a convert, or know of a convert, who is interested in joining, please share the following link: https://chat.whatsapp.com/GatdCD2wBul4zgALgACi3f
❤6
Some people claim that “God,” “Khudā” (خدا), “Dios” or “Īshwar” (ईश्वर), Kadavul (கடவுள்), etc. are not translations of “Allāh.” “Say Allāh akhī!” I’m not sure who originated this slop-inion, but it’s surprising how often it’s spread to laymen as if it’s some divine rule from God’s throne (sorry, “Allāh’s ʿarsh”) itself. A few comments on this in the following post by me: https://x.com/fahd_ibn_ala/status/20887722…
❤9😭2
I know some excellent minds are divided on the taqrīr-texts, but I can’t help but feel happy after receiving this amazing work yesterday, as a gift from a great friend and student. My favorite notes (taqrīr) on my favorite gloss (ḥāshiyah) on my favorite commentary (sharḥ).
❤11👍3
IT & the Continuity of Miracles After Death Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728) mentions that it is completely normal for some people to say salām to the Prophet ﷺ at his grave and receive an audible response from the grave itself, or even at the graves of the [non-Prophets] beloved individuals (awliyāʾ) of God. Such events were not objectionable at all in his view, as he states that “all of this is true (ḥaqq).”¹ Those who do…
❤32
For students who have studied with me at Al-Balagh, I will be conducting a session on Social Media, Validation & Diseases of the Heart. I will be discussing the legal parameters of discussing Islamic topics online, the concept of spirituality often associated with online engagements, how it effects one time and mental health, seeking validation through online endeavors, etc. Time: Saturday, 16th May, 10am (EDT) | 3…
❤18
An Interesting Ḥanbalī/Ḥanafī Transmission When discussing his chain for ʿUmdat al-Aḥkām, the Ḥanbalī expert al-Saffārīnī mentions that he studied the text with his Ḥanafī teacher in Damascus, namely ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Mujallid al-Sulaymī (d. 1140/1728). While al-Mujallid himself was a student of both the Muftī of Ḥanbalīs in Damascus, ʿAbd al-Bāqī (d. 1071/1661), and the Muftī of Ḥanafīs in Damascus, al-Ḥaṣkafī (d.…
❤28🤓2🔥1😐1
The Knowledge of the Prophet’s Wives ﷺ in ʿAlī’s View When ʿUmar was looking into a dispute over ritual bathing (ghusl), he was instructed by ʿAlī to consult the wives of the Prophet ﷺ on the issue. He said ʿUmar, “O Commander of the Believers! The most knowledgeable (aʿlam) of all people on this issue are the wives of the Messenger of God…”¹ A few observations come to mind on this part of the long narration: [1] …
❤30👍5
The companion of the Prophet ﷺ, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿAmr, not only spent his entire life in worship and learning, but also enjoyed his life of wealth, owning property and many slaves. One of his gardens was valued at a million dirhams, which is about 7-8 million in USD.
❤32
Overly strict and unpleasant husbands do not follow the early Muslims (salaf), whose wives found them both strong yet comforting. ʿUmar b. al-Khaṭṭāb would say, “A man should be [playful] like a young boy with his wife, but when it is required of him, he is proven to be a man.”¹ ¹ al-Mujālasah wa-Jawāhir al-ʿIlm, vol. 3, p. 431 (Ibn Hazm: 1998)
❤27
The Qurʾānic instruction, ‘Do not wish for that by which God has made some of you superior to others’ (Q4:32), is soundly interpreted by al-ʿAjlūnī and other classical scholars as a prohibition of envy (ḥasad). This supports the understanding that the perfection of faith (īmān) allows one to compete with others and desire to excel them in good qualities, which is sometimes misunderstood in light of Q4:32.
❤21
I will be teaching two modules within this Tafsīr of Sūrah al-Kahf course this year: [1] March 8 | Sun: The Story of Mūsā & al-Khiḍr (The Trial of Knowledge) [2] March 15 | Sun: Sincerity & Faith (The Sūrah’s Conclusion) Hoping to see the students who enjoy Tafsīr sessions with me, in shāʾ Allāh.
❤15👍7
In his commentary of the ḥadīth of the Prophet’s ﷺ prayer for his grave to not be made an “idol that is worshipped” (wathan yuʿbad), Abū al-Walīd al-Bājī (d. 474/1082) explains that this is the Prophet’s expression of humility towards God and his affirmation of His oneness. In other words, it was obvious to the Prophet ﷺ that God will never turn his grave into an idol, but he disassociated himself from being worship…
❤38
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fahd_ibn_ala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فهد بن عبد القيوم بن العلاء” (@fahd_ibn_ala), 825 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fahd_ibn_ala.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.