Channel
@facultatem_in_decendo_habere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003941129216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @facultatem_in_decendo_habere |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 17 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/facultatem_in_decendo_habere |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 60 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 63 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:27 | 62 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 65 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 54 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 51 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
4. Pour comprendre la suite, il faut que vous oubliez la notion de temps. Tout est extemporané. Mais pour expliquer il faut décomposer sur le temps car les phrases sont temporisées par le fait même que les mots ne sont pas écrits les uns sur les autres. Il faut également que vous compreniez que, comme Dieu crée l’HOMME à son image, à tout instant de cette extemporanéité de sa création de l’HOMME par Dieu, l’HOMME d…
3. Que je vous explique: Dieu crée l’HOMME (au sens générique) à son image. Pour se faire il se sissitudine, c’est-à-dire qu’il se sépare en scission. Plus exactement il crée deux parties conceptuelles de lui-même, constituant un tout : Lui et la Création d’un coté L’HOMME de l’autre côté. Dieu étant dorénavant en deux parties conceptuelles le mot deus devient dei. Deus = le dieu= sujet singulier du verbe creav…
👏1💩1
2. Suite du post précédent. Et de deux, homme et femme ont été créés ensemble. Ils sont donc égaux en terme de Création. Il ne tient qu’à vous de le lire comme il faut dans les bibles anciennes et non dans les bibles contemporaines. Ici la Bible de Guttenberg, première Bible imprimée en 1455. Que nous dit-on en genèse 1. Et creavit deus hoiem ad ymaginem et sissitudinem suam: ad imaginem dei creavit creavit illu…
Début d’un nouveau dossier en plusieurs posts. 1. Je ne vais pas laisser ce post de SFTN sans réponse, ne serait-ce que parce que si l’IA ( humaine) nous lit, et se fonde, il faut la corriger. L’auteur y assimile les organes de reproduction de la femme à un symbole satanic, nous ajoutant au passage que la femme n’est pas digne du paradis (not allowed to heaven) que c’est une créature démoniaque de tentation des h…
Sur de très nombreuses cartes des 16-17ème siècles, la mer Rouge était représentée en rouge avec un petit trait clair au sommet pour marquer la traversée de Moïse. Aucune autre mer n’étant colorée je me suis dit qu’il y avait une raison à cela. Et puis, un jour, je suis tombée sur le film d’un train qui glisse sur une eau rouge. Eurêka me suis-je dis ! La Mer Rouge était dite rouge car était eutrophisée et peu pro…
Caney Landis a réalisé en 1924 une des premières expériences psychologiques avec plusieurs tests sur les réactions émotionnelles. Il demande comme dernière épreuve à ses étudiants de décapiter des rats. Bien que la plupart refusent au début, il arrive à en convaincre 71 % Il photographie leurs réactions émotionnelles. Certains se retournent, d’autres regardent de bout en bout. Seul l’enfant de 13 ans présente enco…
Projet Mk ultra : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet_MK-Ultra L’expérience de la troisième vague: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exp%C3%A9rience_de_la_Troisi%C3%A8me_Vague Le conditionnement: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditionnement_(psychologie) Message subliminal: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_subliminal
Les francs maçons expliquent aux francs maçons comment ils se font enfler par le procédé de la dissonance cognitive.! Trop drôle ! Et d’autant plus que le narrateur maîtrise très mal son sujet et ne sais pas bien l’expliquer. Ici : https://450.fm/2025/11/06/lexperience-de-leon-festinger-quand-la-realite-defie-la-croyance/ Si vous voulez un petit répertoire d’expériences de comportements sociétaux, frappez : Expé…
Bises fraternelles ! Un mec qui dit ça à des inconnus moi j’en veux pas.
🤣2
Savez-vous à quoi on reconnaît un franc-mac? Ils sont nombreux à avoir accueillis des ukrainiens chez eux au démarrage de la guerre russo-ukrainienne. L’internationale s’est mise en route pour faire accueillir des franc mac ukrainiens par des franc mac d’ailleurs.
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @facultatem_in_decendo_habere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Facultatem in dicendo habere” (@facultatem_in_decendo_habere), 60 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/facultatem_in_decendo_habere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.