Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📖 ФАКТОР ЗНАНИЙ 📖

Channel

📖 ФАКТОР ЗНАНИЙ 📖

@factorzn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,624subscribers

+66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065191708
TypeChannel
Username@factorzn
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/factorzn

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,4897,7177,6037 August 2026 — 7,558 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,553 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,522 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,497 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,539 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,518 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,489 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,494 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,612 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,705 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,717 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,659 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,660 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,690 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,624 subscribers7,6247 August 202627 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 50 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,455–7,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 01:207,624-66
17 Sept 2026, 16:387,690+30
14 Sept 2026, 00:377,660+1
10 Sept 2026, 08:557,659-58
4 Sept 2026, 18:427,717+12
1 Sept 2026, 08:067,705+93
29 Aug 2026, 10:567,612+118
26 Aug 2026, 18:277,494+5
24 Aug 2026, 03:157,489-29
20 Aug 2026, 14:237,518-21
17 Aug 2026, 21:337,539+42
14 Aug 2026, 23:567,497-25
11 Aug 2026, 06:057,522-31
8 Aug 2026, 10:177,553-5
7 Aug 2026, 17:467,558first reading

Engagement

168 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 168 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,286 reactions across 144 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43633.9%
❤42633.1%
🔥41031.9%
🤔120.933%
🆒10.078%
🤩10.078%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC171 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Скорость ветра на Нептуне в среднем равна 2100 км/ч.  Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

❤3👍1🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC254 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кофе помогает повысить уровень бодрости, улучшить концентрацию и поднять настроение.  Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

❤5🔥4👍2

28 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC291 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Швейцария потребляет больше всего шоколада в мире, около 10 кг на человека в год. Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

🔥7👍5❤2

28 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC314 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В жаркую погоду можно часто увидеть пьяных пчел, потому что нектар цветов под воздействием высокой температуры начинает бродить. Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

👍2🔥2❤1

28 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC324 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Год назад мой муж и наш 14 летний сын чинили крышу на даче. Сын запнулся и упал головой вниз... Муж сразу же повез ребенка в больницу, но врачи констатировали смерть... За это время муж поседел, осунулся, каждый день плакал и в итоге умер от разрыва сердца... Я решила сделать подзахоронение, чтобы они снова обрели друг друга. Мужчины, которые рыли могилу зарыдали в один голос, когда увидели могилу моего сына. Одног…

❤8👍4🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC338 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дневной сон улучшает память и уменьшает риск сердечных заболеваний. Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

👍3❤2🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC360 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Самцы сумчатой мыши спариваются по 12-14 часов подряд, не отвлекаясь на еду и воду, до тех пор, пока не умрут от истощения. Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

🔥8❤6👍4

28 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC351 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Недавно узнала, что жду ребенка. Он был желанным, в браке 4 года, все по любви, ссор по минимуму. Но сразу мужу говорить не хотелось планировала сюрприз, сделать все по-особенному, для памяти. Пару дней назад подруга пригласила посидеть в кафе. Прихожу, а там вместе с ней сидит мой муж. И его рука на ее руке. Слово за слово, признались, что уже год вместе, любят друг друга, она беременна, поэтому он уходит к ней. Во…

🔥9👍7❤5

28 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC358 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В 2014 году компания Google наняла на работу верблюда по кличке Рафия. Новый "работник" помог создать панораму пустыни Лива в ОАЭ. Наш канал в MAX 👉Подпишись

❤5👍4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @factorzn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Расскажи!
@rasskazhi_channel · 30,857
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📖 ФАКТОР ЗНАНИЙ 📖” (@factorzn), 7,624 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factorzn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.