Channel
@factchecknetuz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
657subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001954877719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @factchecknetuz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/factchecknetuz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 657 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 660 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 661 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 661 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 23.6% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5210956306952758910 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5463289097336405244 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛡 Himoyasiz onlayn zo‘ravonlik: O‘zbekiston raqamli muhitida qonun qayerda tugaydi Onlayn zo‘ravonlik O‘zbekistonda tobora tizimli muammoga aylanmoqda: ayollar, ayniqsa jurnalistlar, raqamli hujumlarga ko‘proq uchramoqda, ammo kiberbulling bo‘yicha hatto asosiy statistika ham mavjud emas. Shov-shuvli holatlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, himoya imkoniyatlari cheklangan va ko‘pincha kechikadi. 📌 Qonunchilik mavjud, ammo u kib…
❤1🔥1🤔1😱1
🎰 Onlayn qimor: yoshlardan millionlar, oilalardan tinchlikni tortib olayotgan yashirin sanoat ‼️ Dunyo bo‘yicha har oltinchi o‘smir allaqachon qimor o‘yinlariga duch kelgan. Platformalar algoritmlari esa shunday tuzilganki, yutqazgandan keyin ham to‘xtash oson emas. O‘zbekistonda bu qonun bilan taqiqlangan — ammo reklama, blogerlar va “prognozlar” orqali yangi auditoriya jalb qilinishda davom etmoqda. Natija — qarzl…
👍2🔥1🙏1
Как изменились цены на жильё за последние годы? По состоянию на декабрь 2022 года, согласно данным обзора Центра экономических исследований и реформ, средняя стоимость 1 квадратного метра жилья на вторичном рынке в Ташкенте составляла 920 долларов. К февралю 2026 года этот показатель вырос до 1 133 долларов. Рост наблюдается и в других регионах. Например, в Самарканде за четыре года цены увеличились с 615 до 877 до…
❤1👍1🙏1
Uy-joy narxlari so‘nggi bir necha yil ichida qanday o‘zgargan? 2022-yil dekabr holatiga ko‘ra, Toshkent shahrida ikkilamchi bozorda uy-joyning 1 kvadrat metri uchun o‘rtacha narx 920 dollarni tashkil etgan. 2026-yilning fevral oyiga kelib esa, poytaxtdagi o‘rtacha narx 1,133 dollargacha ko‘tarildi. Boshqa hududlarda ham o‘sish kuzatilib, masalan, Samarqandda narxlar 4 yil ichida 615 dollardan 877 dollargacha oshga…
❤1👍1🔥1🙏1
⚠️ «Siz sudga chaqirildingiz» — Telegramda tarqalayotgan yangi firibgarlik sxemasi Foydalanuvchilarga ommaviy ravishda “sudga chaqiruv” mazmunidagi xabarlar yuborilib, faylni yuklab olish yoki havolaga o‘tish so‘ralmoqda. Aslida bu rasmiy chaqiruv emas, balki qurilmaga zararli dastur o‘rnatish va shaxsiy ma’lumotlarni qo‘lga kiritishga qaratilgan urinishdir. ⚖️ Hukm: Yolg‘on O‘zbekistonda sud organlari Telegram yoki…
👍2🔥2❤1
💸 Toshkentda kriptovalyuta savdosi uchun 5 sutkaga qamab, mol-mulkini musodara qilishdimi? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda Toshkentlik yigit kriptovalyuta bilan bog‘liq operatsiyalar sabab 5 kunga qamalgan va uning mol-mulki musodara qilingani haqida xabarlar tarqaldi. Ammo bu talqin voqeani to‘liq aks ettirmaydi — gap ma’muriy jazo va aniq bir buyum haqida bormoqda. ⚖️ Hukm: Qisman rost Sud haqiqatan ham litsenziyasiz platfor…
👍1🤔1😁1
🍏 Mevalarni tozalamasak saraton bo‘ladimi? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda qo‘rquv uyg‘otuvchi da’vo tarqalmoqda: go‘yoki olma va bodring po‘stida qoladigan pestitsidlar saratonni keltirib chiqaradi. Ammo haqiqat biroz murakkab — tadqiqotlar ayrim moddalar qoldiqlarini aniqlagan, biroq ularning saraton bilan bevosita bog‘liqligi isbotlanmagan. ⚖️ Hukm: Qisman rost Materialda ilmiy faktlar qayerda tugashi, manipulyatsiya esa qa…
❤1🔥1custom 54632890973364052441
🔐 Wildberries OneID tizimini joriy qildi: Davlat xizmatlarini marketpleysga bog‘lash xavfsizmi? O‘zbekistonlik foydalanuvchilar endi Wildberries’ga OneID orqali kirishlari mumkin. Ushbu yangilik 15 million vatandoshimizning shaxsiy ma’lumotlari sizdirilgani haqidagi xavotirli xabarlar fonida paydo bo‘ldi. Ko‘pchilikda haqli savol tug‘ilmoqda: tizimlarning bunday uzviy bog‘lanishi shaxsiy hujjatlar va PINFL ma’lumotla…
🔥2❤1👍1
🎉Sovrinli tanlov yakunlarini e’lon qilamiz! Biz ishtirokchilar o‘rtasida sovrinli tanlov o‘tkazdik va tasodifiy tanlash yo‘li bilan 5 nafar g‘olibni aniqladik. 🎁Sovrindorlar ro‘yxati: 💇♀️ Fen — shiin_ho 🎶 Bluetooth kolonka — ys.shakhzoda 🧇 Vafli pishirgich — anya_otchenko 💆♂️ Massaj moslamasi — vm_uzb 🔋 Powerbank — the.hansy Tanlovda ishtirok etgan va internetni yanada toza hamda ishonchli qilishga hissa qo‘shay…
❤3🔥2custom 52109563069527589102👍1
🚗 Yaponiyada tezlikni oshirish va yo‘l chiziqlarini bosib o‘tish jazolanmaydimi? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda Yaponiyada oq yoki sariq chiziqdan o‘tsa yoki tezlikni biroz oshirsa, haydovchilar jazoga tortilmasligi haqida gap-so‘zlar tarqaldi. ⚖️ Hukm: manipulyatsiya Yaponiyada yo‘l harakati qoidalari juda qat’iy: oq nuqtali chiziqni ehtiyoj bo‘lsa, bosib o‘tish mumkin, biroq uzluksiz oq yoki sariq chiziqdan o‘tish mutlaqo t…
😁2❤1🔥1custom 54632890973364052441
⁉️ Baland bo‘yli turmush o‘rtog‘i bor ayollarning turmushi yaxshi bo‘ladi, degan gap rostmi? Telegram va messenjerlarda shunday da’vo tarqaldi: bo‘yi baland erkakka turmushga chiqqan ayollar o‘zini baxtliroq his qilarmish. Post mualliflari buni evolyutsiya bilan izohlaydi — go‘yoki ayollar baland bo‘yli erkaklarni himoya va ishonch timsoli sifatida qabul qiladi. ⚖️ Hukm: yolg‘on. Ushbu da’vo keltirilayotgan tadqiqot…
😱2❤1🔥1😁1
🍟🚬 Ba’zi kanallar kartoshka fridagi akrilamid tufayli u 2,5 pachka sigaretaga teng zarar keltiradi, deb da’vo qilmoqda. Ha, akrilamid kraxmalli mahsulotlar yuqori haroratda pishirilganda hosil bo‘ladi va u ehtimoliy kanserogen turkumida qayd etilgan. Ammo odamlarda kartoshka frini odatiy iste’mol qilish saratonga olib kelishi haqida aniq ilmiy dalillar yo‘q. Tadqiqotlar hayvonlarda, odatdagi iste’molga nisbatan min…
custom 52109563069527589103🔥2😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @factchecknetuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,219,142 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FactCheckNET.uz” (@factchecknetuz), 657 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factchecknetuz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.