🔥 Какие форматы B2B-инфлюенс-маркетинга работают лучше всего Сложным B2B-решениям нужен формат, в котором можно показать логику продукта, процесс и результат. Поэтому формат стоит выбирать с учетом этапа воронки и того, насколько хорошо аудитория уже понимает свою задачу. ➡️ Сохраняйте пост и начинайте продвижение через экспертов

Channel
Нативно вышло | в facebase
@facebase_business
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003917279888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @facebase_business |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/facebase_business |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 364 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 363 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 361 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 361 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.7%
- avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 57.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 229 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5402181269016583637 | 19 | 40.4% | |
| custom 5402348875820342810 | 14 | 29.8% | |
| custom 5402519154093759832 | 14 | 29.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📌Можно ли размещать рекламу в Telegram в 2026 году Начнем с вопроса, который в 2026 году возникает раньше, чем обсуждение охватов и стоимости поста: можно ли бизнесу вообще размещать рекламу в Telegram? На сегодняшний день Telegram не запрещен в России полностью и не признан экстремистской платформой. При этом его работа существенно ограничена, а юридический статус рекламы остается неоднозначным. С 1 сентября 2025…
custom 54021812690165836375custom 54025191540937598323custom 54023488758203428102
Нативно вышло | в facebase pinned a photo
Не знаете, у каких блогеров запускать рекламу? Подберём авторов под ваш бренд, целевую аудиторию и бюджет. Вы получите готовый список релевантных блогеров, которые подходят под вашу задачу и уже сейчас готовы обсудить рекламную интеграцию. 🔥Сейчас подбор стоит 1 499 ₽ вместо 12 990 ₽. Это подойдёт, если вы: ⏺️ хотите впервые попробовать рекламу у блогеров ⏺️ уже запускали интеграции, но не получили нужного резуль…
custom 54021812690165836373custom 54023488758203428102custom 54025191540937598321
Вчера впервые встретились с блогерами нашей платформы 😀 До этого мы общались только внутри приложения и комьюнити, а теперь наконец познакомились вживую. Поговорили про контент, работу с брендами и всё, что обычно остаётся за кадром. Для нас эта встреча стала первым шагом к созданию комьюнити авторов facebase. Отдельно благодарим Esterum за площадку и атмосферу! Для наших блогеров команда бара даже создала коктей…
custom 54025191540937598325custom 54021812690165836373custom 54023488758203428103
😀 Какие каналы включить в контент-стратегию бизнеса Универсального набора каналов нет. Чтобы выбрать подходящие площадки, обратитесь к пути клиента и определите, какую роль будет выполнять каждый канал. ⏺️Telegram и MAX Здесь удобно прогревать аудиторию, подробно раскрывать темы и поддерживать регулярный контакт. При этом платформы почти не дают бесплатного притока новых подписчиков, поэтому трафик придётся привле…
custom 54021812690165836375custom 54023488758203428104custom 54025191540937598322
8 часов ТикТока в день — достаточно индивидуальный опыт? Мы к вам с новой порцией мемов и трендов, чтобы вы такой опыт не переживали. 1️⃣ bro do you want to go to... LET'S GO! Мем, перекочевавший и в наши российские ленты. Даже не мем, а звук, под который отлично заходят летние приключения. Тренд пошёл от короткого диалога, где один человек даже не успевает договорить приглашение, а второй уже соглашается. 2️⃣ ..…
custom 54021812690165836373custom 54023488758203428103custom 54025191540937598323
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @facebase_business. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 276,552 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нативно вышло | в facebase” (@facebase_business), 364 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/facebase_business.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.