🔠Що для тебе головне у грі з командою?
- 1️⃣. Хороша комунікація 🗣27%
- 2️⃣. Людина ❤️20%
- 3️⃣. Тактика та стратегія 🧠10%
- 4️⃣. Фановий настрій 😂43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥6❤🔥1🥰1

Channel
@face_2f_media
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003043008298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @face_2f_media |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 27 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/face_2f_media |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 136 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 136 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
116 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 22.4% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 17.2% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 11.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 8.62% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 6.90% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 6.03% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 6.03% | |
| 🤷♀ | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 9 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠Що для тебе головне у грі з командою?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥6❤🔥1🥰1
🔠Як ти найчастіше знаходиш нових тимейтів для гри?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥2👍1🔥1
Хвилюємось за їхні стосунки більше, ніж за свої #меми
🔥6🤣6😁3🤨2❤1
👑 RP сезон підсумки: які українські клани на вершині? Нашу першу сходинку рейтингу займає клан LV де посів 17-те місце серед кланів світу з RP. Другу сходинку забирає клан NEW STARS не лише тим що посів 29-те місце серед кланів світу з RP, а ще за кількістю кланів які увійшли в цей топ, цілих три клани RP 🔠(клани які увійшли в топ 100 світу з RP) 1️⃣7️⃣ LOUIS RP 2️⃣9️⃣ NEW STARS 5️⃣0️⃣ NEW STARS 5️⃣1️⃣ NEW S…
❤🔥5❤3👍2
✅Закрита двіжуха, для лідерів в кого клан не просто існує ✅Не важливо скільки в тебе учасників в клані ✅Не важливо якого рівня твій клан Якщо твій клан активно бере участь в праках/турах, тдм і вов викликах, якшо твій клан не боїться грати різні формати гри, зв'яжіться зі мною @KEKCIK_tv ‼️Створимо свій топ і покажемо де перспектива а де афк гніздо ‼️Чат створений для лідерів, замів і кепів команд які показують резул…
❤2🔥1
🔠Які напрямки гри викликають у вас найбільше інтересів?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5🔥1
#меми
😁10❤5🤣3🤡1
ЯК ВИДІЛИТИСЯ В ТІК-ТОКУ І НЕ ТІЛЬКИ? РОЗКРИЄМО СЕКРЕТ NEW STARS. ПРОДОВЖЕННЯ 🫱Підсумовуємо і підтверджуємо фактами: Зараз не з'являються нові NEW HARD, X5, ZSU та інші. Чому і чи з'являться вони взагалі? Тому що епоха, коли все було в новинку, минула. Зараз з'являється в рази більше кланів. Аудиторію Pubg Mobile, нас з вами, більше не здивуєш танцюльками в лобі. І наскоком виділитися з натовпу вже навряд чи вийде. …
🔥4👍1🤯1
ЯК ВИДІЛИТИСЯ В ТІК-ТОКУ І НЕ ТІЛЬКИ? РОЗКРИЄМО СЕКРЕТ NEW STARS Ні для кого з нас не секрет, що Tik-Tok є зараз найефективнішою платформою для кланів в контексті набору нових учасників, самовираження та впізнаваності. Але чому одні зазнають невдач, а інші досягають вершин? Давайте розберемося на прикладі Tik-Tok акаунта клану NEW STARS. 🗣️Можемо відразу спойлерити: -ексклюзивність -якість -природність і прозорість…
🔥2🤯1
#ПЛІТКИ клан GU LIBERTY, чесно найбільш ігноруючий клан який тільки був, ти пишеш в чат хто грати йде 1 ну максимум 2 людини, ти щось в них питаєш а реакції 0, лідерша нормальна привітна а зами. То страх, клан буде нормальним після того як всіх перестануть ігнорувати. 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Запропонувати будь-який інфопривід, написати плітки абсолютно анонімно: 🔗БОТ ПЛІТКАР
🤡6🤷♀3🙉2🍌1💩1🤣1
#ПЛІТКИ клан maybe push розпався і ніхто про це не говорить. inoy лідер який стрімив посварився з тими з ким стрімив. а іншим учасникам клану сказав: «ви самі вийдете чи мені вам допомогти?» ось так 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Дійсно, на каналі пост про набір до клану вважається недійсним. Хоча до недавнього часу цей пост був у нього в закріплених повідомленнях... Запропонувати будь-який інфопривід, написати плітки абсолютно анонімн…
🤯6
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @face_2f_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔠Що для тебе головне у грі з командою?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔠Як ти найчастіше знаходиш нових тимейтів для гри?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔠Які напрямки гри викликають у вас найбільше інтересів?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔠Що мотивує тебе залишатися в PUBG-ком’юніті?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 9 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FACE TO FACE MEDIA” (@face_2f_media), 136 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/face_2f_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.