Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

склеп коварной госпожи | god of mischief

@fabulousgodofmischief

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

322subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002064494196
TypeChannel
Username@fabulousgodofmischief
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fabulousgodofmischief

Growth

3203223216 August 2026 — 320 subscribers6 August 2026 — 320 subscribers14 August 2026 — 322 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 320–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:19322+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:01320no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:21320first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.3%
avg views ÷ 322 subscribers
Avg views / post
220
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (8 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,859
Reactions total414
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

611 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540239078611120611821835.7%
custom 577365257383575886110216.7%
❤‍🔥8614.1%
custom 5411208843596158762528.51%
custom 5825662974227911190406.55%
custom 5188372406837742388345.56%
203.27%
🥰172.78%
💯132.13%
💔101.64%
custom 531023073508329957191.47%
🔥81.31%
😭20.327%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC70 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

только и вспоминается легендарное от Сайлуса из LADS «are you up for a joyride later?» 😑 отчасти желание осуществилось через проходку четвертой главы #сказкиподземелий, но в идеале бы повторить заезд 😈

custom 518837240683774238810custom 54023907861112061186custom 57736525738357588615🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC102 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Джеральд проверил время. Простое и машинальное действие – быстро достал телефон, включил экран и убрал обратно, – но совершенно выбивающееся из выбранного образа. К старинным часам, оттягивающим карман жилета, он не привык. «Вот тебе и историческая достоверность, – подумал Джеральд, касаясь пальцами тонкой цепочки. – Господи, пожалуйста, только бы мы не оказались единственными в костюмах». Их с Фанни пригласили на

custom 540239078611120611813❤‍🔥10custom 577365257383575886152

3 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC164 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

👂🪮🥒🪨 🥒🪨🥒🧵⌛️🌲🧵 Обычно Герда не сожалела о деяниях, совершенных в прошлом. Она придерживалась простого правила: если она поступила так, значит, в тот момент это было для неё важно. Однако с начала вынужденных приключений по сказочному миру её мировоззрение претерпело изменение. «Надо было больше заниматься спортом, – кисло подумала Герда, поднимаясь с земли. – И записаться на курсы по самообороне. Тогда бы

custom 54023907861112061189custom 51883724068377423888custom 57736525738357588616❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC171 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

до чего технолоджиа дошла: теперь не только читаем народное творчество, но и слушаем! 😎 мой последний очерк по #сказкиподземелий неожиданно превратился в настоящий аудиоспектакль. всё – по мановению руки автора канала Страсти по Шарику, за что ей невероятно благодарна 😫

custom 540239078611120611813❤‍🔥8🥰6custom 57736525738357588612

2 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC156 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kamishiwa_AIFile

🥒💃🪮🦈🟡🌲🧵🪡🌲 🖤🍇🖤🍇🥒🏡🌲 Зашла в гости к коварной госпоже на чай с вкусняшкой, а вышла с историей про нашу красавицу Герду и сердцееда рыцаря без страха, но с упреком во взгляде Мордреда. Несу и вам послушать сердечные переживания главной героини новеллы "Сказки подземелий". 🔙🔛🔛🔛🔘🔛🔛🔛🔜 Немного обиды, немного злости, разбитые надежды, волшебный лес — и один невыносимо красивый мужчина, который совершенно не умеет беречь чу

custom 540239078611120611815custom 57736525738357588618❤‍🔥6custom 51883724068377423882

1 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC147 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Телефон лежал на привычном месте – по правую руку на рабочем столе – и невыносимо раздражал. Экран насмешливо чернел: в это время дня обычно не было ни сообщений, ни звонков. Джеральд с досадой смотрел на устройство и злился. «Разве я дал ей понять, что хочу продолжить общение? – подумал он. – Один поход в кафе не значит, что она решится написать первой». Пангур тихо вздохнул из-под стола. Пёс вёл себя непривычно:

custom 540239078611120611820custom 577365257383575886110custom 58256629742279111907❤‍🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC393 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Разговоры шли неторопливо. Началась первая подача блюд, и гости не спешили переходить к бурному обсуждению тем, которые волновали общество в последние недели. Беседа крутилась, как сытый кот у ног: еда уже не требовалась, но ритуал отчего-то продолжался. Так и дискуссия не покидала пределы пустяков – от погоды до дежурных похвал сервизу. Леди Каслрой благодарила сухо – Фрэнсис Энн видела, чего стоило её покровительни

custom 540239078611120611817custom 577365257383575886112❤‍🔥7custom 51883724068377423883

27 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC310 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Ненавижу, ненавижу!» – твердила Герда. Она шагала по узкой тропинке. Тонкие ветки цеплялись за подол платья, из-за чего ей приходилось постоянно его поправлять. Герда с непривычным равнодушием подумала, что зацепок всё равно не избежать. Обычно она вещи берегла – если что-то порвалось, не выбрасывала, а чинила, из-за чего над ней смеялся Мориц, – но сейчас ей не хотелось дорожить тем, что за неё выбрал кто-то друго

custom 540239078611120611818💔10❤‍🔥8😭2

23 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC272 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ожидания о его недостатках: забывает важные даты, храпит, оставляет в холодильнике пустой пакет молока 😨 реальность: не в ладах со стрельбой 😱 отсюда запоминаем новое правило #сказкиподземелий и не подпускаем медовика к луку…

custom 541120884359615876223custom 58256629742279111908custom 51883724068377423887💯3

22 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC249 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7custom 54023907861112061187❤‍🔥5🥰2

22 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC224 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

– Безумие… – Абсолютно согласен. – Мы обязаны быть благоразумны… Ответ не сложился в слова – только в невнятное мычание, довольное и бесстыжее. Тяжёлая ткань тихо зашуршала. Подол, словно заколдованный, пополз вверх. Сквозь тонкие чулки лодыжки лизнул свежий воздух. Она вздрогнула, но не от холода. От предвкушения запретного, притягательного удовольствия, которое обещали его руки. – Нас заметят. – Здесь темно,

custom 540239078611120611819custom 57736525738357588619❤‍🔥7custom 51883724068377423884custom 58256629742279111903

20 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC244 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Норма Эрхарт была уверена, что у неё осталась последняя нервная клетка. Конечно, она сгущала краски, но общее состояние было далеко от идеала. Летом, как всегда, поток клиентов из блога приутих: одни просто отдыхали, другие наслаждались погожими деньками и не думали о проблемах грядущего, а третьи и вовсе позабыли о соцсетях. А вот в «Кукольном театре», напротив, посетителей было полно. С открытием летней веранды спр

custom 540239078611120611811custom 58256629742279111906❤‍🔥3custom 57736525738357588613🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fabulousgodofmischief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 322,694 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“склеп коварной госпожи | god of mischief” (@fabulousgodofmischief), 322 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fabulousgodofmischief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.