Channel
@fableborne
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
430subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001743029300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fableborne |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fableborne |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 430 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 431 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 433 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 433 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 62.0% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 35.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2023 to 22 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐻 We've climbed further up the progress mountain with the new Bear Model & beyond. Here's a bear-sized bite of what's in store. Join our Discord for an exclusive update and more! Come follow Fableborne's latest Project Update, only on Discord: https://t.co/XsUlY7SglX https://t.co/pkY7lNE9qw — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 22, 2023
❤36👍10🔥2
Thank you once again for participating in the Fableborne Closed Playtest. Your support and feedback are invaluable to us as we continue to refine and improve the game for future releases. — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 22, 2023
❤7👍2
Now, we need your valuable feedback and for that matter, we are sending ever every participant a survey within the next few hours. Please make sure to complete the survey by May 25th, 11 AM UTC to retain your access to the next playtest! — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 22, 2023
❤1
Unfortunately, we had a small mishap happen, and the servers closed a bit too earlier than expected tonight, but do not worry, and you will have another chances in the foreseeable future to play the game again! 🤞 — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 22, 2023
👍2
Thank you for participating in the Fableborne Closed Playtest III! 🌟 We hope you had a great time playing the game and checking out the latest new features, like the Player Progression. https://t.co/QefBInU6yD — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 22, 2023
👍1
You heard him. Get him, get him fast 😈 https://t.co/VozSq6Qope — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍2
⚠️ If you have installed a version from a previous playtest, delete the game from your device, then download and install a new version. If you don’t delete the previous version, we cannot guarantee that the game will work properly. — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍1
The team was able to resolve the login issues mentioned earlier, and we have decided to enable servers again! Please note that you do not have to install the app again, if you have already installed it today! — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍1
The Closed Playtest III is live now, the servers are back up and running! 🚀 As a reminder, the Fableborne Closed Playtest was extended and will end now on May 22nd, 12 AM UTC! https://t.co/Ps2faObRSS — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍1
The team will continue to investigate a solution. The good news is that we have already decided to extend the playtest by 24 hours until May 22nd, 12 AM UTC. We will keep you posted on our progress and let you know as soon as the servers are back online! — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍1
After investigating the login issues with the current Closed Playtest III build, we've concluded that resolving this issue will take more time than initially estimated. We believe that disabling the server altogether is the best decision for the time being. — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍1
We recently changed how we handle email authentication with the server. Unfortunately, with the latest build for Closed Playtest III, this change created an issue that prevents players from logging into the game. — Fableborne🔺 (@fableborne) May 18, 2023
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fableborne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,017,208 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fableborne” (@fableborne), 430 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fableborne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.