Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fa Soil

@fa_soil

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

434subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211638182
TypeChannel
Username@fa_soil
Created6 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fa_soil

Growth

4349 Aug 2026, 23:02 — 434 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:00 — 434 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:0210 Aug 2026, 05:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 433–435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:00434no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:02434first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 434 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held8 (21 June 202615 July 2026)
Views total159
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8760.0%
🔥3926.9%
custom 5368421241227081078128.28%
👍74.83%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC159 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @geography_hsePhoto

🔬 Студенты 3-го курса направления «Глобальные изменения природной среды и климата» прошли «Научно-исследовательский семинар» на базе Института географии РАН. Семинар признан лучшим по трем критериям студенческой оценки: полезность для карьеры, расширение кругозора и новизна знаний. За год студенты погрузились в реальную науку: от полевого выезда на болото до работы с георадаром и электронным микроскопом. 👨‍🔬 Курс у

🔥9

10 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC294 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Я честно собиралась писать статью, рилс сам себя записал.. Расстроилась, что всего одна медалька за забег, но зато много бейджиков с конференций со всего мира ❤️ Подготовка к каждой конференции занимает огромное количество времени, от года до нескольких лет - нужно провести исследование: съездить в поле, сделать анализы, разобраться в них, подготовить материалы для публикации и для выступления. Огромная благодарно

17custom 536842124122708107812👍3

7 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC244 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @youngdokuchaevPhoto

Дорогие коллеги и друзья! 🔥 Мы открыли регистрацию и рады пригласить вас на юбилейную Х конференцию! ❤️ Конференция состоится с 14 по 18 сентября 2026 г. в ФИЦ «Почвенный институт им. В.В. Докучаева» (Москва, Пыжевский пер., д. 7, стр. 2). Подробную информацию о секциях этого года, размере оргвзносов, условиях участия и порядке регистрации можно найти: 🔴 на сайте института в разделе, посвященном конференции 🔴 в

👍2

7 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC238 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @loya_memes

Леди и джентльмены, господа и дамы крио- палео- и городские пововеды! Приглашаю к участию в секции "Редукционизм и холизм в познании генезиса и функций почв". Если вас напугало название, это не значит, что мы не ждëм ваших работ 🥺🥺🥺 ведь ваш покорный админ и по совместительству куратор секции жаждет, чтобы вы рассказали про MIS3 и MIS5, показали, что делают с почвами криотурбации и какие почвы вы исследуете в город

5

26 Jun 2026, 07:13 UTC321 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosagrohimPhoto

«Караван Шёлкового пути»: 1363 км знаний о том, как сберечь землю 🐫 Российский этап международного «Каравана Шёлкового пути» завершился месяц назад. Маршрут от Махачкалы до Астрахани прошёл через Дагестан, Калмыкию и Астраханскую область – три региона, где опустынивание и засуха острее всего сказываются на земле и жизни людей. 🇺🇳 Акция стала частью глобальной кампании в поддержку Международного года пастбищных земе

4👍2

25 Jun 2026, 15:24 UTC333 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Очень большая гордость за ребят на практике ФГГТ ВШЭ. Радостно, что студенты 1 курса успешно осваивают КиДПР и WRB, хотя у них всего 2 месяца читается Педосфера. И за короткий период практики (3 дня) мы выкапываем 4 почвенных разреза, измеряем стабильность агрегатов, дыхание почв, делаем анализы рН и TDS, картографируем ареалы по нескольким параметрам (мощность гумусового горизонта, цвет по Манселлу и тд). Главное, ч

22🔥17

22 Jun 2026, 06:37 UTC360 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

12🔥8

21 Jun 2026, 18:03 UTC371 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Начало практики (Гидромет+педосфера) в Рузе у студентов факультета географии и геоинформационных технологий Вышки. Очень звездное начало 💫

27🔥5

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @fa_soil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 576,926 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fa Soil” (@fa_soil), 434 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fa_soil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.