Channel
@f0kun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
436subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001909007104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @f0kun |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/f0kun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 436 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 435 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 435 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (17 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,880 |
| Reactions total | 888 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
888 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5251695467619695631 | 385 | 43.4% | |
| custom 5251647050453367767 | 311 | 35.0% | |
| custom 5251626838337272678 | 192 | 21.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 888reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @f0kun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
это не учебная тревога!! повторяю!! это не учебная тревога!! там Лёша в видосик попал, хедканоны частично совпали с правдой😏😏😏
custom 525169546761969563131custom 525162683833727267818custom 525164705045336776717
винкс вернулись к нам винкс спешат к друзьям🧚♀️🧚♀️ я дала ебу, редрав скетча 2024 года, вообще у меня был еще более проработанный вариант, но я его куда-то!! проебала😢 п.с. они в образах любимок своих #ocs #ПедроЛёши 4ч
custom 525169546761969563131custom 525162683833727267818custom 525164705045336776713
Педро в дизайне от моей жены, заставляет меня хотеть жить!!!! поза по рефу с пинтереста еще хочу обратиться ко всем рисовакам тут у меня!! скиньте свои картинки последние или то, что рисуете прям сейчас😏😏😏хочу узнать что вы у меня рисуете #ocs #ПедроЛёши
custom 525169546761969563142custom 525164705045336776719custom 525162683833727267815
зайчик на прогулке🥺🥺 вообще хотела просто полнорост наскетчить, но в последний момент накинула ему еще фончик для тренировочки вообще если так подумать, то с фоном это выглядит так, будто мы за ним их кустов следим............ #ocs #ПедроЛёши
custom 525164705045336776740custom 525169546761969563115custom 525162683833727267813
а и кстати спасибо большое за звездочки!! отмечаю юбелей тыща звезд у канала🎉🎉🎉
custom 525169546761969563118custom 52516268383372726782
продолжаем парад скетчей каждый день наш с женой сладкий малыш коник😄😄 #ocs
custom 525164705045336776741custom 525162683833727267818custom 525169546761969563114
сегодняшний напукиш с работы Лёша в возрасте 21 года❤️❤️❤️ #ocs #ПедроЛёши
custom 525169546761969563140custom 525164705045336776723custom 525162683833727267816
внезапный дроп скетча по аушке с Педро певичкой😴😴😴 #ocs #ПедроЛёши
custom 525164705045336776740custom 525162683833727267819custom 525169546761969563114
на работе вытрепали все нервы🥹🥹🥹 успокаивала себя порисульками в скетчбуке, все позы спиздила с пинтераста, чтоб не думать #ПедроЛёши #ocs
custom 525169546761969563131custom 525162683833727267819custom 525164705045336776713
скетчик из магмы с Лёшенькой по стардью валли и картинка прошлого года рядышком для вайбика вообще всем спасибо за 400 папищеков!! я бы хотела допом предупредить, что у меня тут практически целиком контент состоит из осов и скетчей, не забывайте там инфопост иногда чекать #ocs #ПедроЛёши
custom 525169546761969563140custom 525164705045336776719custom 525162683833727267816
дроп некоторых малышариков👅 #cmm
custom 525164705045336776750custom 525169546761969563118custom 525162683833727267815
поредачила немного старый скетч, а то Педро там это просто кошмар какой-то😭😭😭
custom 525169546761969563141custom 525164705045336776714custom 525162683833727267811
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @f0kun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 300,750 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fokun 18+” (@f0kun), 436 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f0kun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.