Channel
@ezwealthyou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
277subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002428386951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ezwealthyou |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 17 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ezwealthyou |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 277 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 278 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 278 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2025 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
70% of Polymarket Traders Lost Money as Top 0.04% Captured Most Profits: Data Roughly 70% of Polymarket's 1.7 million trading addresses recorded losses while fewer than 0.04% captured over 70% of total profits, totaling $3.7 billion. 🍀Wanna gamble? Get 100% welcome bonus and play here 👉 paripesa.bet/ouch 🍀
Bayern Munich vs Chelsea | Match Spoilers: Kane to score Bayern to win Goals in both Halves 👉Get your 100% bonus and bet without risk - http://paripesa.bet/ouch
MicroStrategy bought another 6,556 $BTC ($555.85M) at an average price of $84,785 last week. Micro Strategy currently holds 538,200 $BTC($46.83B), with an average buying price of $67,766 and an unrealized profit of $10.36B. @ezwealthyou
An #Ethereum OG sold all the remaining 2,001 $ETH($3.82M) 6 hours ago. This OG bought 5,001 $ETH(cost $1.38M) at $277 in 2017—and didn’t sell even when $ETH hit $4,878 during the last bull run. A month ago, he started selling $ETH, making a total profit of $8.66M. At the peak, though, his unrealized gains once reached $23M. @ezweatlhyou
The $ACT crash has caused this whale to lose $2.17M! This whale withdrew 4.58M $ACT(then worth $2.49M) from #Binance 4 months ago; now, it's worth just $320K —a $2.17M hit. @ezwealthyou
A whale dumped 438B $PEPE($3.03M) at a loss of $434K in the past hour. @ezwealthyou
The whale who once made ~$108M on $TRUMP lost $207K in just one hour yesterday. He spent 5M $USDC to buy $TRUMP right after Donald Trump posted “I LOVE $TRUMP,” on twitter then sold an hour later—taking a $207K loss. This is the same whale who previously spent 1.09M $USDC to buy 5.97M $TRUMP and walked away with ~$108M in profit! @ezwealthyou
A trader turned $809 into $510K in less than 15 hours by trading $szn on #Tron, a 630x return! He spent 3,600 $TRX($809) to buy 46.4M $szn and sold 12.5M $szn for 400,890 $TRX($94K), leaving 33.9M $TRX($416K). @ezweatlhyou
In the past 24 hours, the DEX volume on #BSC reached $1.637B, surpassing #Solana and ranking first. @ezwealthyou
A whale dumped all $HYPE 8 hours ago, losing more than $1.8M! From Feb 25 to Mar 4, this whale spent 5.08M $USDC to buy 266K $HYPE at an average price of $19.08. 8 hours ago, he sold for 3.27M $USDC at an average price of $12.27, losing over $1.8M. @ezwealthyou
Someone lost $1.82M due to phishing transaction signatures! @ezwealthyou
A whale bought another 200 BTC($16.55M) 2 hours ago and currently holds 315 BTC($26.06M). @ezwealthyou
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ezwealthyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ez wealth” (@ezwealthyou), 277 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ezwealthyou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.