Channel
@ezil_me_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
899subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001121784900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ezil_me_news |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ezil_me_news |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 899 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 900 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 902 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 905 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 906 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 909 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 910 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 910 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
79 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 45 | 57.0% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 19.0% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 13.9% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 8.86% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2024 to 30 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ezil.me News pinned «Zilliqa 2.0 migration complete The network transition to Zilliqa 2.0 has finished successfully and all services are operating normally. Action required: Please restake your ZIL on a ZIL 2.0 node here → https://stakezil.com/?poolId=MHgwNjhD Existing stakes…»
Zilliqa 2.0 migration complete The network transition to Zilliqa 2.0 has finished successfully and all services are operating normally. Action required: Please restake your ZIL on a ZIL 2.0 node here → https://stakezil.com/?poolId=MHgwNjhD Existing stakes on legacy nodes will no longer earn rewards once the final sync is sealed. Your funds remain safe throughout this process. If your wallet temporarily shows zero…
👍3🤩1
‼️Dear miners, please be aware of scammers trying to pose as Ezil team members. Ezil team will never contact you first in DM or elsewhere and ask for money or your personal information. All your enquiries will be handled through [email protected]‼️
Notice of Closure Dear Miners, The Ezil mining pool shut down its operations on March 25, 2024. We have made sure that all payouts were made and have decided to bear the costs for even the smallest balances to be paid out. You need to switch to another pool to continue mining. We would kindly like to remind you that, as per the General Terms of Operation, the balances of Miners who had not been actively mining wit…
😢8👍2❤1
Dear miners, After sending out payouts to the miners of OCTA network, we noticed that the coin team did not lower the reward after block 4,000,000 to 1.85 OCTA according to the documentation, but kept it at 2.3 OCTA for a full block. In this regard, starting from February 9, 2024 13:17 UTC, our system followed the data from the coin documentation: https://files.octa.space/OctaSpaceBrief.pdf and awarded a reward of …
❤5
Ezil.me News pinned «Dear miners, Ezil.me ceased mining pool operations on 25 March 2024 (12:00 PM UTC). We hope that your transition to another mining pool was smooth. As of now we completed all the outstanding payouts💰 to miners whose balance was more than 0. Ezil.me has been…»
Dear miners, Ezil.me ceased mining pool operations on 25 March 2024 (12:00 PM UTC). We hope that your transition to another mining pool was smooth. As of now we completed all the outstanding payouts💰 to miners whose balance was more than 0. Ezil.me has been a top tier Ethereum mining pool for many years. We’ve been curious and gathered some stats - in nearly 5 years Ezil has mined 77006 blocks of Ethereum! All thi…
😢9❤3👍1
Dear all, ETHW, ETHF and OCTA have been paid to all miners having balance > 0. Team will continue working on paying out remaining coins, such as ETC tomorrow. Best regards, Ezil.me team
👍6
Dear all, All the stratum mining pools have been stopped. The team will start paying out the remaining balances as soon as unconfimred blocks will be confirmed which will happen in several hours. Best regards, Ezil.me team
😢12❤1
‼️REMINDER: Ezil will stop its mining operations on 25 March 2024 (12:00 PM UTC). Please make your arrangements for transitioning to other mining pools‼️
😢9👎3
Dear miners, ETHF network has been recovered as well as its mining on Ezil pool. Best regards, Ezil.me team
Dear miners, The ETHF coin (new name - Dischain) is experiencing syncing issue of the blockchain. Blocks that the pool mines will be rejected by the network. Please immediately switch your equipment to any other coin. In recent weeks, there have been major issues in the ETHF network; on March 3, all but one of the pool nodes went down. Usually in such cases, re-synchronizing the blockchain “from scratch” helps, but…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ezil_me_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ezil.me News” (@ezil_me_news), 899 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ezil_me_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.