Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Eyecon™ Trust — Vouches

@eyecontrust

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

298subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003888363285
TypeChannel
Username@eyecontrust
DescriptionReal orders. Real completions. Real proof. Follow the process from request to resolution—account recoveries, restorations, removals, and verified outcomes, documented in real time. No claims without proofs. — by @gelact ⚝ #01 Social Media Sol in TG
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 8 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/eyecontrust

Growth

29810 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 298 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:15 — 298 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:0110 Aug 2026, 16:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 297–299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:15298no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:01298first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 298 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 March 202621 July 2026)
Views total151
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026

Thanks @Gelact for a monitor Bot , fast and reliable work. Humble Guy 🤩

29 Apr 2026, 17:33 UTC242 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ran my ADs for 30 days successfully, had 80K real forwardings to high quality groups and earned some real shit. Thanks to @EyeconBumps and @Gelact for the highest quality ADs in the market. ✅

26 Apr 2026, 13:31 UTC224 viewsread 10 August 2026

Thanks @Gelact for a great Ad service, fast and reliable work. Would definetly recommend 💪

26 Apr 2026, 11:19 UTC206 viewsread 10 August 2026

nah this is crazy, grabbed the $15 adbot from @Gelact & @EyeconBumps and got 2 clients within 24 hours... actually insane how fast this worked, everything just clicked. best $15 i’ve spent love you guys

3 Apr 2026, 19:20 UTC259 viewsread 10 August 2026

9/10 friendly and active support , best prices , recommended from me

21 Mar 2026, 19:40 UTC≈21,200 viewsread 10 August 2026

vouch for @jaalebis & @eyeconlabs, got my IG post removed, paid $250 upfront, everything went smooth, legit and easy to work with.

20 Mar 2026, 09:28 UTC252 viewsread 10 August 2026

Vouch for @jaalebis, Thanks for using my @interveil service for $24, Much Appreciated! 🤝

19 Mar 2026, 10:42 UTC246 viewsread 10 August 2026

@EyeconBumps really understood the assignment! TG ADs just runs in the background while you chill, Highest UPTIME ever bot always run 24/7 no need to worry about anything 💚

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eyecontrust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 439,629 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Eyecon™ Trust — Vouches” (@eyecontrust), 298 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eyecontrust.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.