Channel
@extinction_webellion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
267subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001115888178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @extinction_webellion |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 January 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/extinction_webellion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 267 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 269 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 269 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (13 January 2022 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 447 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
The poll is not showing all people in favour of the new change here (currently 15 not in favour, incl 3 even ready to leave; 38 in favour, only 2 of which strongly in favour). So i would like to invite for reflections upon questioning ourselves... Caution, these may be difficult subjects, as it requires each of us to be willing to heal and grow for the better common good of all. Yet such questions as follows are pro…
Kontakt zur Admin-Gruppe unter [email protected]
Channel name was changed to «Lovestorm gegen Rechts»
Umwidmung des Kanals zu "Lovestorm gegen Rechts"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Gestern veranstaltete die Gruppe "Smash Cruiseshit" eine aufsehenerregende Seeblockade-Aktion um gegen die enorme Klimabelastung der Kreuzfahrtindustrie zu protestieren. Die OZ hat daraufhin eine Meinungsumfrage gestartet, die aktuell 75,9% auf "unangemessen" steht. Das ist bei einem bürgerlich-konservativen Käseblatt leider nicht überraschend. Ihr wisst was zu tun ist: https://www.ostsee-zeitung.de/lokales/rostock/o…
https://www.rbb24.de/panorama/beitrag/2023/04/voting-klimaaktivisten-blockaden-streiks-meinung-umfrage.html Bitte an dieser Umfrage teilnehmen und weiterleiten, danke!
Hmmm...35% dagegen...bitte abstimmen: https://civey.com/umfragen/29299/sollte-bundesverkehrsminister-volker-wissing-den-schwerpunkt-bei-der-verkehrspolitik-ihrer-meinung-nach-starker-auf-den-klimaschutz-legen
In dem Kanal von https://t.me/aufstandderletztengeneration sind viele Trolle unterwegs. Mehr Unterstützung von Sypathisant*innen wäre sinnvoll, um ein Gegengewicht zu den Dislikes und Trollkommentaren zu schaffen. 😬
https://www.mobil.org/umfrage-zum-tempolimit-2022/ Umfrage zum Tempolimit, aktuell die Gegner*innen am drücker weil autowebsite aber können wir ja ändern ;)
Finde jetzt deinen Klimastreik für Freitag! 🌏✊ Und es kommen immer mehr dazu. Auf fridaysforfuture.de/reichthaltnicht findet ihr laufend die neuesten Infos!
#FridaysForFuture ist gerade ein Hashtag voller Trolle und Hater. Das können wir doch umdrehen oder?
💥 Tweetstorm: 7 Tage bis zum Globalen Klimastreik! 💥 Am Freitag machen wir ab 14 Uhr auf Twitter unter #PeopleNotProfit und #PeaceAndJustice deutlich, warum am 25.03. alle auf die Straße kommen sollten. Zentrale Botschaften sind: 1️⃣ Der neue IPCC-Bericht zeigt, dass die Auswirkungen der Klimakrise bereits enorm sind und immer häufiger zu einer Frage des Überlebens werden. Wenn wir nicht endlich unsere Abhängigkei…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @extinction_webellion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Umwidmung des Kanals zu "Lovestorm gegen Rechts"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2022 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lovestorm gegen Rechts” (@extinction_webellion), 267 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/extinction_webellion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.