Вот и настала пора, когда реально надо закрываться. Всем спасибо за такое проведённое время, всех ценим и любим! ❤️
🍓44custom 542496753510568124116💘13custom 53461878319182086316🕊5

Channel
@exst1zm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
296subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002100781390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @exst1zm |
| Description | ᅠ ᅠ﹙🥩﹚𝐃𝗂𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋 ─ ✿‵𝟢𝟩 𝐈𝐗.fd’ : manhwa, manga, manhua, anime, games ! ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ★᤻﹕RUSH OF LOVES-рол﹐⛪️ 𝅄 ゛own: @? ; co-own: ゛ about question: ✶ ⩇𝟵 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/exst1zm |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
411 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 152 | 37.0% | |
| 💘 | 94 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5424967535105681241 | 91 | 22.1% | |
| 🕊 | 68 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5346187831918208631 | 6 | 1.46% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 411reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2024 to 26 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот и настала пора, когда реально надо закрываться. Всем спасибо за такое проведённое время, всех ценим и любим! ❤️
🍓44custom 542496753510568124116💘13custom 53461878319182086316🕊5
Channel name was changed to «closed»
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Маргарет / fd’ : Manhwa » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @afvoiz 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Зи (子) – Граф(-иня) ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
💘10custom 54249675351056812419🍓6🕊5
Signed ㅤ⌗ 𝖵𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗇
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Флора / fd’ : Winx Club » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @soniakisser 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Сяо (小) – Младшая ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓7🕊3custom 54249675351056812413💘2
Signed ㅤ⌗ 𝖵𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗇
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Субару Сакамаки / fd’ : Diabolik Lovers » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @heartfromia 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Ши (士) – Джентльмен ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
custom 54249675351056812417🍓6💘4🕊3
Signed ᅠ𝗻𝗲 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗒𝖺
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Микото Такашики / fd’ : Mikoto Nikki » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @ZeekIIWexus 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Лао (老) – Старейшина ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓5💘3🕊3custom 54249675351056812413
Signed ᅠ𝗻𝗲 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗒𝖺
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Беннетт / fd’ : Hello, Charlotte! » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @MelonxDD 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Бо (伯) – Маркиз ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓6💘5custom 54249675351056812415🕊3
Signed ᅠ𝗻𝗲 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗂𝗇𝗒𝖺
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Канаэ Кочо / fd’ : Manga/Anime » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @Rudbekia_heh 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Кун (君) – Лорд ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓6custom 54249675351056812414💘3🕊3
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Лариет Изабель / fd’ : Manhwa » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @Rudbekia_heh 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Сяо (小) – Младшая ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
💘7🍓6🕊4custom 54249675351056812414
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Незуко Камадо / fd’ : Manga/Anime » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @kanroji_0 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Лао (老) – Старейшина ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓5💘4custom 54249675351056812414🕊3
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Сильвер / fd’ : Sonic the hedgehog 2006 » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @theYufix 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Ви (男) – Барон ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓7💘5🕊4custom 54249675351056812414
ׅ ׄ . 𓂃 ݁-𝖱𝖴𝖲𝖧 𝖮𝖥 𝖫𝖮𝖵𝖤𝖲’𝐬: 🔞𑁯ㅤ۫ ݁ ପ ⌗. 𖥻 Давайте же узнаем, кто самый преданный фанат персонажа ниже :: 🧣’ ┆݊« Эвил Нейро / fd’ : VTubers » 📍𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗋 : @mitzuux 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗌 : Ши (士) – Леди ‹‹ репосты с целью продвижения ›› ┈ ✩ 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗁’𝖮&𝖥’𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 ˃ࡇ˂ !!🕹️
🍓6💘4custom 54249675351056812414🕊3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @exst1zm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 663,122 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@exst1zm named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“closed” (@exst1zm), 296 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exst1zm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.