24 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC93 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
ᴇxᴘᴏꜱᴇᴅᴄʀᴏᴀᴛꜱ
@exposedcroats
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
115subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003885666152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @exposedcroats |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 16 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/exposedcroats |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 115 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 114 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 112 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 110 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 44.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 23.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
24 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
If Dinko had just looked a bit more closely at the post, he would have seen it says 6-700,000, not 6,700,000; the reason it's written that way is that Google Translate sometimes misreads things and translates them incorrectly. But anyway, that wasn't even the point of the whole post. And I had already responded to the part about the Chetniks, so that's that.
❤2👍1
23 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTCviews —
ᴇxᴘᴏꜱᴇᴅᴄʀᴏᴀᴛꜱ pinned a photo
23 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo
In another dispatch in late 1941, Glaise cited the report of a German agent who had been in Bosnia in November and had contacts with several leading Muslims. According to this informant, the Muslims considered "conditions existing at that time much worse than those prevailing in the old Yugoslavia and stated that the Serbs, despite many faults, had behaved more decently than the Croats. "64 The report also described …
❤1
23 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC98 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
away from their initial support for the NDH, the Muslims had increasingly taken to expressing their dissatisfaction more openly. First the Muslims from Sarajevo, then those from Banja Luka, informed their representative in the NDH government, Dr Osman Kulenović, of their concern about the persecution of Serbs by the 'irregular Ustasha' and its ramifications for the Muslim population. (These concerns are dis-cussed fu…
❤3
10 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC140 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
10 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC181 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Parežanin did not write that all Serbs are "worse than Jews." The Ustaše are once again attempting to quote a small fragment of the text to create misleading content. By the phrase "these people of ours," he referred to the Serbs, whom he accused of aiding Jews, communism, or the political system of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia as it existed at the time. He claimed that it was they who enabled Jews to wield their alle…
❤1
10 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC175 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo
GERMAN GENERAL IN CROATIA ACCORDING TO THE USTASA The German general in Croatia, Edmund Glaise Horstenau, was critical of the regime. Similarly, the commanders of the Wehrmacht formations operating in the NDH often complained about the Ustasha's conduct on the ground. The following document shows the point of view of a German commander and illustrates the relations between the Wehrmacht and the Ustasha. It also unde…
9 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC114 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @kontrarevolucijaPhoto
САРАДЊА КОМУНИСТА И УСТАША? Комунистичка партија Југославије поздравља усташки покрет и позива људе да му се придруже. „Задатак комуниста је да помогну ширењу усташког покрета. Против „великосрпске војно-фашистичке диктатуре“. Комунисти активно учествују у усташком покрету и предводе тај покрет (комунистички лист „Пролетер“, 1935.) Повезани текст: Усташки покрет није фашистички? —————————————————— t.me/kontrarevolu…
8 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @revolutionaryhistoryPhoto
𝐒𝐒-𝐎𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐦𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐟𝐮𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐫 𝐇𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐦 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐉𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚: “…There are still various Jews in public positions, particularly in the economic sector and in the field of medicine. Several attempts have already been made to resolve these issues with the competent Croatian authorities. However, the Croatian side repeatedly emphasized that the resolution of these sectors is difficult… There are also Jews in vari…
🔥4
3 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Quotes revealing Ante Pavelić's criticism of Hitler and the Germans, and the state of relations between the NDH and Germany. The first quotes are from an article by Jole Obrenović in *Večernji list* (May 31, 2015) titled "Historical Exclusive – Ante Pavelić's Diary Entries on Meetings with Hitler." They read as follows: "Hitler made a fatal mistake when he declared war on the United States of America." "The war a…
❤3👍1
1 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC218 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video
Soviet & ustasha negotiations between September 1944 and February 1945. Soviets were willing to recognize NDH (regardless of the massacres commited) if the ustashas let Red Army go to the Adriatic coast and legalize Communist Party. Although at the end Pavelic refused , it is good to know what the Bolsheviks offered to ustashas during almost 6 months of negotiations with Soviet delegates in Croatia. Croat larpers use…
👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @exposedcroats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴇxᴘᴏꜱᴇᴅᴄʀᴏᴀᴛꜱ” (@exposedcroats), 115 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exposedcroats.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.