Начнем с базы И я разучилась рисовтаь я 5 часов делала етот цветной скетч🤜👎 Фулл в комм #ninah #NSFW
🔥25custom 52201536830644049429❤4❤🔥4
Signed Длшт Бссв

Channel
@explosionboombam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002925932781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @explosionboombam |
| Description | Я не умею рисовать не ждите ничиво крутово | | NSFW |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/explosionboombam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 97 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 97 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
532 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 239 | 44.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 70 | 13.2% | |
| 🍌 | 60 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5220153683064404942 | 45 | 8.46% | |
| 🖕 | 43 | 8.08% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 7.71% | |
| 😨 | 18 | 3.38% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.94% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 0.94% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Начнем с базы И я разучилась рисовтаь я 5 часов делала етот цветной скетч🤜👎 Фулл в комм #ninah #NSFW
🔥25custom 52201536830644049429❤4❤🔥4
Signed Длшт Бссв
Фу я села рисовать
❤🔥13🍌3custom 52201536830644049421
Signed Длшт Бссв
11 предметов 9 пятерок и 2 четверки. Братва отдыхаю и начинаю рисовать порево по всем фд которие у меня есть (Бегала за преподами чтоб сдать побыстрее и рисоват порна)
❤14❤🔥5🔥1
Signed Длшт Бссв
До 28о числа кажди день по 2 предмета надо сдаватт😭😭 после наконец каникулы я смогу рисовать 💐💐💐
❤13🍓2
Signed Длшт Бссв
Ребят я канал павла дурова
❤20🔥1
Signed Длшт Бссв
Всэм привет я вернус лэтом(может чото ее порисуб в этом месяце, но смотря как меня заебут) у меня в колледже отменили все автоматы. Зря сторалась лучше бы вместо учоба рисовала порна. Теперь стродат.
😨18🍓3
Signed Длшт Бссв
Нет моя сперма
❤12🍌6
Signed Длшт Бссв
Сперма
❤12🍌6
Signed Длшт Бссв
67
🖕23❤🔥8😎3❤1
Signed Длшт Бссв
Первый пошел И женски и мен версия чтоб никому абидна не была Фулл в комм #NSFW #клоунада
❤36🔥8❤🔥7custom 52201536830644049426🍌2💊1
Signed Длшт Бссв
Вот было бы не лень рисовать столько порно нарисовала бы Я через лень рисую ждите
❤22
Signed Длшт Бссв
Поставите дехлайк если вы любите сиксевен
🖕20❤7
Signed Длшт Бссв
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @explosionboombam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,250,300 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бом бом бум💥 18+” (@explosionboombam), 97 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/explosionboombam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.