Channel
@experimentef
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003592007454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @experimentef |
| Created | 20 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/experimentef |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 117 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 111 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 111 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
168 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 47.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 12.5% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 3.57% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 2.98% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.38% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 🤓 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.595% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем спасибо за вчерашнюю встречу! Думаю, каждый из нас после фильмов Кубельки может взглянуть на кино немного под другим углом! Увидимся в следующем семестре! ❤️ А пока советую прочитать небольшое интервью Джонаса Мекаса (еще одной легенды авангардного кино) с Петером Кубелькой на тему Нашего Путешествия в Африку: https://boxd.it/4svjtH
🔥5🤓3❤2👌1🙏1
Аудитория 224!
👏3❤2🔥2
Последний показ в этом учебном году! За 57 лет режиссерской деятельности Петер Кубелька снял всего 9 короткометражних фильмов, суммарный хронометраж которых - 83 минуты, но влияние, которое он оказал на авангардное кино, и кино в целом, переоценить невозможно. Лично по моему мнению, никто не деконструировал кино так, как Кубелька. Ни до, ни после. Приходите посмотреть и подробно разобрать 4 его самых известных филь…
❤9🔥8👍3💔1😢1
Спасибо, что пришли сегодня, ребята! 🫶 Было очень живо и весело, я очень доволен! Приходите в следующий раз, он будет последний в этом учебном году! Будет полная жесть 🤫🫣
❤12🔥6👀2👏1
Мы возвращаемся с новым показом! Фильмы Джоди Мэк, в каком-то смысле, - полная противоположность фильмов Черкасского, которые мы смотрели в прошлый раз. Ее работы яркие, колоритные, можно даже сказать, позитивные. Больше всего Мэк интересуют текстуры разных предметов, будь то произведенных человеком драгоценных украшений и материнских плат, или существующих в природе самих по себе минералов и цветов. Ее самый извес…
❤🔥12❤8
Спасибо большое всем, кто пришел! Как мне кажется, очень уютно посидели и отлично поговорили. А тех, у кого не получилось прийти, ждем в следующий раз!
❤15❤🔥12🕊3
Уже в эту пятницу состоится наш первый показ! Петер Черкасски известен тем, что берет пленки уже существующих фильмов - иногда известных, иногда нет - и переделывает их так, что получившиеся картины ничего общего с первоисточником не имеют. Черкасски лаканист и теоретик кино, его фильмы сами по себе можно назвать теоретическими: материя кино, то бишь пленка, в них всегда является конкретным объектом исследования. Ч…
❤15😱5❤🔥3💋1
Всем привет! Мы открываем клуб любителей экспериментального кино на Экономическом факультете МГУ! Экспериментальное кино - очень широкое понятие, внутри этого медиума тоже есть свои течения, свои классики и аутсайдеры. Единственное, что объединяет все эти фильмы - эксперимент с кинематографической формой. Мы не будем зациклены на одном конкретном типе этих фильмов и гарантируем новый, уникальный опыт каждый раз, ког…
❤17❤🔥8💘6🤮1
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @experimentef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,457,176 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“экспериментальные фильмы на эф” (@experimentef), 117 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/experimentef.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.