Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

EXECUTE ART

@executexe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002101978200
TypeChannel
Username@executexe
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/executexe

Growth

155156155.56 August 2026 — 155 subscribers8 August 2026 — 155 subscribers13 August 2026 — 156 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:37156+1
8 Aug 2026, 18:31155no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:08155first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 4 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

244 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546551145944423528811547.1%
custom 54318861175341921437530.7%
custom 52134489041079042485422.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @executexe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 April 2026 to 13 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC148 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

потом дорисую

custom 546551145944423528818custom 543188611753419214310custom 52134489041079042486

30 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC260 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сделала шорты в комплект к недавно выпущенным футболкам 👻 / 🍓 Инфо у рейвкрю

custom 546551145944423528812custom 54318861175341921438custom 52134489041079042486

24 Jun 2026, 18:20 UTC284 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Завезли контента с Челябинска! Так смотрятся новые джерси вживую😍

custom 546551145944423528815custom 543188611753419214310custom 52134489041079042488

28 Apr 2026, 18:18 UTC561 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⠀👻👻👻👻👻👻 ⠀ 👻👻👻👻👻👻 👻 BLACK EDITION 🍓 CUTE EDITION Сделала джерси-футболки челябинским ребятам в двух цветах! Больше информации тут

custom 546551145944423528827custom 521344890410790424818custom 543188611753419214313

15 Apr 2026, 10:21 UTC783 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#custom_portfolio набиваю руку, в будущем будет возможность заказать кастом

custom 546551145944423528816custom 54318861175341921437custom 52134489041079042486

9 Apr 2026, 10:48 UTC655 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💥 🔺♦️🔺🔺 💥небольшой отчет Сделала совместно с ребятами из Сибирской тусы интересное: ♦️ Афишу за 150 часов до рейва ♦️ Буквы из картона по 1,4 метра Обмотали блестяшкой, времени ушло много, но получилось круто! Над ними трудилась большая команда ♦️ Открытки в виде билетов для бас-туров Распечатали на очень плотной бумаге, получились как настоящие🥹 Организатор перфомансов, директор стадиона и идейный исполнител

custom 543188611753419214315custom 54655114594442352888custom 52134489041079042485

4 Apr 2026, 05:22 UTC829 views36 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

💥💥💥💥💥💥 новый логотип и оформление составов новые джерси🔥 эмоджи-пак (еще в процессе) спойлер: впереди самое интересное 😈 [канал SLAM PATROL] 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 💥

custom 546551145944423528819custom 543188611753419214312custom 52134489041079042485

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @executexe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 252,487 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EXECUTE ART” (@executexe), 156 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/executexe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.