hai

Channel
Ξ£π«πΣΣπ π§πΞ£ π¦π£Ξ£Ξ£π
@excthespeed
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
599subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002617589579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @excthespeed |
| Description | β Hi, we're ο΄Ώβο΄Ύ "Ξ£π«πΣΣπ π§πΞ£ π¦π£Ξ£Ξ£π " ο΄Ώβο΄Ύ Circle is warm, this is where you look for friends or family. This is your place to have fun and this is your place to socialize. BOT OFFICIAL : @EXCEEDROBOT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/excthespeed |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 599 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 599 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 20.0%
- avg views Γ· 599 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 120
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.20%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 β 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,280 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 28
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 6 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customΒ 5033056699968127861 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| customΒ 5190703156740254243 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| customΒ 5116116063188157350 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| customΒ 5310021462801806136 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| customΒ 5400196976945955894 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| customΒ 6174666119710772912 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| customΒ 6257957952330665037 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| customΒ 6187946317503797848 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| customΒ 6233524738082216859 | 2 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 19 we hold a reading for Β· 5%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @excthespeed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ €γ €γ €γ € π§πΞ£ π !π¦π¦!Γπ‘ π¦π§ππ₯π§π¦ πΞ£π₯Ξ£! γ €γ €γ €γ €β’ βββββββ βββββββ β’β’ #EverestTeam 1. Kaerro @zKaerro 2. Gerald @ngeutntot 3. Sajiwa @blackqard ο»Ώ π¦π§ππ¬ π§ΓπΞ£π§πΞ£π₯, πΣΣπ£ π§πΞ£ π¦π£ππ₯ππ§ ππππ, ππ‘π πΞ£π§ π₯Ξ£πππ¬ π§Γ πΓπ π£πΞ£π§Ξ£ π§πΞ£ π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘! Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π Ξ£π πΞ£π₯ πππ¦ π π₯ΓπΞ£, ππ‘π Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π§Ξ£ππ πππ¦ π π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘ π§Γ πππΓπ π£πππ¦π. πΎ β β β β β β β β ( π³π³π³ ) πΞ£π¬Γπ‘π π!π !π§π¦, β β β β β β β β β β ππ¨!ππ§ πΓπ₯ ππ₯!ππ§. β β β β βββββββββββββββββ
customΒ 51161160631881573501customΒ 51907031567402542431customΒ 61746661197107729121customΒ 62335247380822168591customΒ 62579579523306650371
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ €γ €γ €γ € π§πΞ£ π !π¦π¦!Γπ‘ π¦π§ππ₯π§π¦ πΞ£π₯Ξ£! γ €γ €γ €γ €β’ βββββββ βββββββ β’β’ #RockyTeam 1. Gerald @ngeutntot 2. Sebastien @pxpond 3. Jeffry @bserewok 4. Anaya @Gorgeousrt γ € π¦π§ππ¬ π§ΓπΞ£π§πΞ£π₯, πΣΣπ£ π§πΞ£ π¦π£ππ₯ππ§ ππππ, ππ‘π πΞ£π§ π₯Ξ£πππ¬ π§Γ πΓπ π£πΞ£π§Ξ£ π§πΞ£ π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘! Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π Ξ£π πΞ£π₯ πππ¦ π π₯ΓπΞ£, ππ‘π Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π§Ξ£ππ πππ¦ π π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘ π§Γ πππΓπ π£πππ¦π. πΎ β β β β β β β β ( π³π³π³ ) πΞ£π¬Γπ‘π π!π !π§π¦, β β β β β β β β β β ππ¨!ππ§ πΓπ₯ ππ₯!ππ§. β β β β βββββββββββββββββ
customΒ 51907031567402542431customΒ 61879463175037978481
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ €γ €γ €γ € π§πΞ£ π !π¦π¦!Γπ‘ π¦π§ππ₯π§π¦ πΞ£π₯Ξ£! γ €γ €γ €γ €β’ βββββββ βββββββ β’β’ #RubbleTeam team rubble : 1. Kaerro @zKaerro 2. Abay @Lycverpool 3. Rajen @iJdwyn 4. Dante @stresjx γ € π¦π§ππ¬ π§ΓπΞ£π§πΞ£π₯, πΣΣπ£ π§πΞ£ π¦π£ππ₯ππ§ ππππ, ππ‘π πΞ£π§ π₯Ξ£πππ¬ π§Γ πΓπ π£πΞ£π§Ξ£ π§πΞ£ π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘! Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π Ξ£π πΞ£π₯ πππ¦ π π₯ΓπΞ£, ππ‘π Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π§Ξ£ππ πππ¦ π π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘ π§Γ πππΓπ π£πππ¦π. πΎ β β β β β β β β ( π³π³π³ ) πΞ£π¬Γπ‘π π!π !π§π¦, β β β β β β β β β β ππ¨!ππ§ πΓπ₯ ππ₯!ππ§. β β β β βββββββββββββββββ
customΒ 54001969769459558941customΒ 62579579523306650371
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ €γ €γ €γ € π§πΞ£ π !π¦π¦!Γπ‘ π¦π§ππ₯π§π¦ πΞ£π₯Ξ£! γ €γ €γ €γ €β’ βββββββ βββββββ β’β’ #MarshallTeam 1. Bkei @Duoggy 2. Cantik @StonnyAngel 3. Abay @Lycverpool 4. Sabine @theprettiestwon γ € π¦π§ππ¬ π§ΓπΞ£π§πΞ£π₯, πΣΣπ£ π§πΞ£ π¦π£ππ₯ππ§ ππππ, ππ‘π πΞ£π§ π₯Ξ£πππ¬ π§Γ πΓπ π£πΞ£π§Ξ£ π§πΞ£ π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘! Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π Ξ£π πΞ£π₯ πππ¦ π π₯ΓπΞ£, ππ‘π Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π§Ξ£ππ πππ¦ π π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘ π§Γ πππΓπ π£πππ¦π. πΎ β β β β β β β β ( π³π³π³ ) πΞ£π¬Γπ‘π π!π !π§π¦, β β β β β β β β β β ππ¨!ππ§ πΓπ₯ ππ₯!ππ§. β β β β βββββββββββββββββ
customΒ 51907031567402542431customΒ 62335247380822168591
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ €γ €γ €γ € π§πΞ£ π !π¦π¦!Γπ‘ π¦π§ππ₯π§π¦ πΞ£π₯Ξ£! γ €γ €γ €γ €β’ βββββββ βββββββ β’β’ #TrackerTeam 1. Anaya @Gorgeousrt 2. Lupi @maeluu 3. Raje @iJdwyn 4. Mara @iNamtantip γ € π¦π§ππ¬ π§ΓπΞ£π§πΞ£π₯, πΣΣπ£ π§πΞ£ π¦π£ππ₯ππ§ ππππ, ππ‘π πΞ£π§ π₯Ξ£πππ¬ π§Γ πΓπ π£πΞ£π§Ξ£ π§πΞ£ π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘! Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π Ξ£π πΞ£π₯ πππ¦ π π₯ΓπΞ£, ππ‘π Ξ£π©Ξ£π₯π¬ π§Ξ£ππ πππ¦ π π ππ¦π¦πΓπ‘ π§Γ πππΓπ π£πππ¦π. πΎ β β β β β β β β ( π³π³π³ ) πΞ£π¬Γπ‘π π!π !π§π¦, β β β β β β β β β β ππ¨!ππ§ πΓπ₯ ππ₯!ππ§. β β β β βββββββββββββββββ
customΒ 50330566999681278611customΒ 51161160631881573501customΒ 54001969769459558941
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @excthespeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 424,349 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@excthespeed named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βΞ£π«πΣΣπ π§πΞ£ π¦π£Ξ£Ξ£πβ (@excthespeed), 599 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/excthespeed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.