Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Σ𝗫𝗖ΣΣ𝗗 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗦𝗣ΣΣ𝗗

@excthespeed

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

599subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002617589579
TypeChannel
Username@excthespeed
Descriptionβ€Ž Hi, we're ﴿‏﴾ "Σ𝗫𝗖ΣΣ𝗗 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗦𝗣ΣΣ𝗗 " ﴿‏﴾ Circle is warm, this is where you look for friends or family. This is your place to have fun and this is your place to socialize. BOT OFFICIAL : @EXCEEDROBOT
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/excthespeed

Growth

5996 Aug 2026, 22:18 β€” 599 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:30 β€” 599 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:186 Aug 2026, 22:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 598–600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:30599no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:18599first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
20.0%
avg views Γ· 599 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total2,280
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Videos
1
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customΒ 5033056699968127861720.6%
customΒ 5190703156740254243617.6%
customΒ 5116116063188157350411.8%
customΒ 5310021462801806136411.8%
customΒ 540019697694595589438.82%
customΒ 617466611971077291238.82%
customΒ 625795795233066503738.82%
customΒ 618794631750379784825.88%
customΒ 623352473808221685925.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for Β· 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @excthespeed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€ 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗠!𝗦𝗦!Γ˜π—‘ 𝗦𝗧𝗔π—₯𝗧𝗦 𝗛Σπ—₯Ξ£! γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€β€’ ─━━━━━━ ━━━━━━─ β€’β€’ #EverestTeam 1. Kaerro @zKaerro 2. Gerald @ngeutntot 3. Sajiwa @blackqard ο»Ώ 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗬 π—§Γ˜π—šΞ£π—§π—›Ξ£π—₯, π—žΞ£Ξ£π—£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π—¦π—£π—œπ—₯π—œπ—§ π—›π—œπ—šπ—›, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 π—šΞ£π—§ π—₯Σ𝗔𝗗𝗬 π—§Γ˜ π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—ŸΞ£π—§Ξ£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘! Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗠Σ𝗠𝗕Σπ—₯ 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π—₯Γ˜π—ŸΞ£, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗧Σ𝗔𝗠 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘ π—§Γ˜ π—”π—–π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—Ÿπ—œπ—¦π—›. 🐾 β €β €β €β €β €β €β €β €( 𝟳𝟳𝟳 ) π—•Ξ£π—¬Γ˜π—‘π—— π—Ÿ!𝗠!𝗧𝗦, ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗕𝗨!π—Ÿπ—§ π—™Γ˜π—₯ 𝗗π—₯!𝗙𝗧. β €β €β €β €β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β–ˆβ”‚β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚

customΒ 51161160631881573501customΒ 51907031567402542431customΒ 61746661197107729121customΒ 62335247380822168591customΒ 62579579523306650371

30 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€ 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗠!𝗦𝗦!Γ˜π—‘ 𝗦𝗧𝗔π—₯𝗧𝗦 𝗛Σπ—₯Ξ£! γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€β€’ ─━━━━━━ ━━━━━━─ β€’β€’ #RockyTeam 1. Gerald @ngeutntot 2. Sebastien @pxpond 3. Jeffry @bserewok 4. Anaya @Gorgeousrt γ…€ 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗬 π—§Γ˜π—šΞ£π—§π—›Ξ£π—₯, π—žΞ£Ξ£π—£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π—¦π—£π—œπ—₯π—œπ—§ π—›π—œπ—šπ—›, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 π—šΞ£π—§ π—₯Σ𝗔𝗗𝗬 π—§Γ˜ π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—ŸΞ£π—§Ξ£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘! Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗠Σ𝗠𝗕Σπ—₯ 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π—₯Γ˜π—ŸΞ£, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗧Σ𝗔𝗠 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘ π—§Γ˜ π—”π—–π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—Ÿπ—œπ—¦π—›. 🐾 β €β €β €β €β €β €β €β €( 𝟳𝟳𝟳 ) π—•Ξ£π—¬Γ˜π—‘π—— π—Ÿ!𝗠!𝗧𝗦, ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗕𝗨!π—Ÿπ—§ π—™Γ˜π—₯ 𝗗π—₯!𝗙𝗧. β €β €β €β €β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β–ˆβ”‚β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚

customΒ 51907031567402542431customΒ 61879463175037978481

30 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€ 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗠!𝗦𝗦!Γ˜π—‘ 𝗦𝗧𝗔π—₯𝗧𝗦 𝗛Σπ—₯Ξ£! γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€β€’ ─━━━━━━ ━━━━━━─ β€’β€’ #RubbleTeam team rubble : 1. Kaerro @zKaerro 2. Abay @Lycverpool 3. Rajen @iJdwyn 4. Dante @stresjx γ…€ 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗬 π—§Γ˜π—šΞ£π—§π—›Ξ£π—₯, π—žΞ£Ξ£π—£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π—¦π—£π—œπ—₯π—œπ—§ π—›π—œπ—šπ—›, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 π—šΞ£π—§ π—₯Σ𝗔𝗗𝗬 π—§Γ˜ π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—ŸΞ£π—§Ξ£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘! Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗠Σ𝗠𝗕Σπ—₯ 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π—₯Γ˜π—ŸΞ£, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗧Σ𝗔𝗠 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘ π—§Γ˜ π—”π—–π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—Ÿπ—œπ—¦π—›. 🐾 β €β €β €β €β €β €β €β €( 𝟳𝟳𝟳 ) π—•Ξ£π—¬Γ˜π—‘π—— π—Ÿ!𝗠!𝗧𝗦, ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗕𝗨!π—Ÿπ—§ π—™Γ˜π—₯ 𝗗π—₯!𝗙𝗧. β €β €β €β €β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β–ˆβ”‚β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚

customΒ 54001969769459558941customΒ 62579579523306650371

30 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€ 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗠!𝗦𝗦!Γ˜π—‘ 𝗦𝗧𝗔π—₯𝗧𝗦 𝗛Σπ—₯Ξ£! γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€β€’ ─━━━━━━ ━━━━━━─ β€’β€’ #MarshallTeam 1. Bkei @Duoggy 2. Cantik @StonnyAngel 3. Abay @Lycverpool 4. Sabine @theprettiestwon γ…€ 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗬 π—§Γ˜π—šΞ£π—§π—›Ξ£π—₯, π—žΞ£Ξ£π—£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π—¦π—£π—œπ—₯π—œπ—§ π—›π—œπ—šπ—›, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 π—šΞ£π—§ π—₯Σ𝗔𝗗𝗬 π—§Γ˜ π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—ŸΞ£π—§Ξ£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘! Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗠Σ𝗠𝗕Σπ—₯ 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π—₯Γ˜π—ŸΞ£, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗧Σ𝗔𝗠 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘ π—§Γ˜ π—”π—–π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—Ÿπ—œπ—¦π—›. 🐾 β €β €β €β €β €β €β €β €( 𝟳𝟳𝟳 ) π—•Ξ£π—¬Γ˜π—‘π—— π—Ÿ!𝗠!𝗧𝗦, ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗕𝗨!π—Ÿπ—§ π—™Γ˜π—₯ 𝗗π—₯!𝗙𝗧. β €β €β €β €β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β–ˆβ”‚β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚

customΒ 51907031567402542431customΒ 62335247380822168591

30 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€ 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗠!𝗦𝗦!Γ˜π—‘ 𝗦𝗧𝗔π—₯𝗧𝗦 𝗛Σπ—₯Ξ£! γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€β€’ ─━━━━━━ ━━━━━━─ β€’β€’ #TrackerTeam 1. Anaya @Gorgeousrt 2. Lupi @maeluu 3. Raje @iJdwyn 4. Mara @iNamtantip γ…€ 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗬 π—§Γ˜π—šΞ£π—§π—›Ξ£π—₯, π—žΞ£Ξ£π—£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π—¦π—£π—œπ—₯π—œπ—§ π—›π—œπ—šπ—›, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 π—šΞ£π—§ π—₯Σ𝗔𝗗𝗬 π—§Γ˜ π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—ŸΞ£π—§Ξ£ 𝗧𝗛Σ π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘! Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗠Σ𝗠𝗕Σπ—₯ 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π—₯Γ˜π—ŸΞ£, 𝗔𝗑𝗗 Σ𝗩Σπ—₯𝗬 𝗧Σ𝗔𝗠 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗔 π— π—œπ—¦π—¦π—œΓ˜π—‘ π—§Γ˜ π—”π—–π—–Γ˜π— π—£π—Ÿπ—œπ—¦π—›. 🐾 β €β €β €β €β €β €β €β €( 𝟳𝟳𝟳 ) π—•Ξ£π—¬Γ˜π—‘π—— π—Ÿ!𝗠!𝗧𝗦, ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗕𝗨!π—Ÿπ—§ π—™Γ˜π—₯ 𝗗π—₯!𝗙𝗧. β €β €β €β €β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β–ˆβ”‚β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚β–ˆβ•‘β•‘β–Œβ•‘β”‚

customΒ 50330566999681278611customΒ 51161160631881573501customΒ 54001969769459558941

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @excthespeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 424,349 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œΞ£π—«π—–Ξ£Ξ£π—— 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗦𝗣ΣΣ𝗗” (@excthespeed), 599 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/excthespeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.