Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EXCLUSIVE

Channel

EXCLUSIVE

@exclusivepubgm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

311subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002434826891
TypeChannel
Username@exclusivepubgm
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 21 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/exclusivepubgm

Growth

311326318.57 August 2026 — 326 subscribers8 August 2026 — 326 subscribers14 August 2026 — 321 subscribers20 August 2026 — 318 subscribers28 August 2026 — 311 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 309–328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 05:48311-7
20 Aug 2026, 15:43318-3
14 Aug 2026, 10:27321-5
8 Aug 2026, 07:19326no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:19326first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,890 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍61932.8%
👎47525.1%
1628.57%
🎉1286.77%
🔥995.24%
🍌794.18%
🏆673.54%
❤‍🔥663.49%
💯392.06%
🦄271.43%
😈241.27%
🤯241.27%
🌚150.794%
🗿150.794%
110.582%
😁100.529%
😡100.529%
😎70.37%
🍓60.317%
💋30.159%
2 further kinds40.212%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,890reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2024 to 5 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 20 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @exclusivepubgm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 October 2024 to 5 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2025, 21:05 UTC≈3,230 views59 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2612🍌10🤯6❤‍🔥2💋1😈1😍1

13 Feb 2025, 13:29 UTC≈5,020 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥13🌚6🏆43🍌3😈1

5 Feb 2025, 00:49 UTC≈4,580 views99 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026

С днём рожденья меня что-ли

🎉88👍64🍌1

9 Jan 2025, 21:14 UTC≈4,540 views121 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давно хотел иметь свой личный магазин по продажам акаунтов где буду в роли гаранта. Если такое случится у вас будет доверие моему магазину? Хочу посмотреть кто как про меня думает и постараюсь создать магазин по продажам акаунтов Я доверяю 👍🏻 Я не доверяю - 👎🏻 Буду рад честному ответу ❤️

👍94👎224🔥1

9 Jan 2025, 04:18 UTC≈3,630 views121 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Коды работают?😐 Да - 👍🏻 Нет - 👎🏻

👍65👎51🍌32

6 Jan 2025, 00:06 UTC≈4,080 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Раскладка 1-7435-8449-0827-3382-171 Чувствительность 1-7638-4753-8972-2957-962

31👍9💯6🏆5👎3🍌2❤‍🔥1😈1

16 Dec 2024, 00:43 UTC≈4,990 views60 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Poll

Сливаю лицо CRAZY 🤔

  1. Да87%
  2. Нет4%
  3. Жду не дождусь9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🎉24❤‍🔥11🍌9👍6😈4🔥31💋1

11 Dec 2024, 19:04 UTC≈5,660 views76 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Тотуриал на установку файла для регестрации урона уже на канале 👇 🎁 https://t.me/+FJWJZWbr3rBmZTQy

❤‍🔥33👍1996👎6🍌2😈1

8 Dec 2024, 22:23 UTC≈5,380 views257 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

UC SHOP CTRAXANET 💩 Не советую данный магазин, клоунада полная 🤡 Дефолт - 👍🏻 Клоуны - 👎🏻

👎220👍266🍌2🔥2😈1

8 Dec 2024, 00:26 UTC≈5,600 views98 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍6210❤‍🔥7💯53🍌3🎉3🌚2

3 Dec 2024, 11:08 UTC≈4,940 views165 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Говорят коды перестали работать, обновляю? 🤔 Да - 👍🏻 Нет - 👎🏻

👍141👎125🔥3🍌1💋1🗿1😈1

25 Nov 2024, 22:02 UTC≈5,790 views53 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Vs EDVIN 💩 total 2-1 Решил залить на бича чтобы канал не стоял AFK EXCLUSIVE CHANNEL 🇷🇺

🦄20🏆10👍10❤‍🔥6🗿3💯2🎉1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @exclusivepubgm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Dec 2024, 00:43 UTCAnonymous Poll623 voters

Сливаю лицо CRAZY 🤔

  1. Да87%
  2. Нет4%
  3. Жду не дождусь9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2024 to 5 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EXCLUSIVE” (@exclusivepubgm), 311 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exclusivepubgm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.