Channel
@examus_proctoring
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
366subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001605358262 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @examus_proctoring |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/examus_proctoring |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 366 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 378 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 379 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 380 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 378 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 378 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 377 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Списывание на экзаменах в Китае приравнивается к преступлению. В России такое невозможно представить! Иначе бы сколько дел пришлось завести? Согласно исследованию НИУ ВШЭ, 63% студентов периодически пользуются шпаргалками 😱 Рассуждаем, почему в России так лояльны к списыванию. Наша версия – в карточках. Пишите свои предположения в комментариях ✍🏻
⚡ Уже давно мы работаем над интеграцией с Единой биометрической системой (ЕБС). А все для того, чтобы проходить тестирование с прокторингом стало еще безопаснее и удобнее. Летом мы планируем запустить пилотные проекты, а пока рассказываем, что за зверь такой эта система и чем она полезна пользователям Экзамуса 🔥
Согласно исследованию СберЗдоровья и Atsearch Group, 51% компаний выбрали автоматизацию и цифровизацию HR-процессов главным трендом 2024 года ❗ Под влиянием этой тенденции бизнес все чаще обращается к прокторингу, а почему — читайте в карточках.
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @examus_proctoring. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Экзамус” (@examus_proctoring), 366 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/examus_proctoring.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.