Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Exampur Official Telegram

@exampurofficialtelegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

119,325subscribers

+243 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001459631592
TypeChannel
Username@exampurofficialtelegram
DescriptionOnly place for all exams related PDFs,videos,solutions,and many more....
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/exampurofficialtelegram

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@exampurofficialtelegram/13642 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC@VivekSirNotes/40625 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC1.0072 seconds
@exampurofficialtelegram/13659 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC@VivekSirNotes/40716 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@exampurofficialtelegram/13642 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC@preetimamexampurnotes/46905 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC1.002 minutes
@exampurofficialtelegram/13659 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC@preetimamexampurnotes/47066 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC1.0072 seconds
@exampurofficialtelegram/13642 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC@parikshagarh/398255 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC1.0072 seconds
@exampurofficialtelegram/13659 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC@parikshagarh/398376 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@VivekSirNotes8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutesthis entry (80)
@preetimamexampurnotes8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutesthis entry (80)
@parikshagarh7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @exampurofficialtelegram — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

119,068119,325119,196.56 August 2026 — 119,082 subscribers7 August 2026 — 119,068 subscribers8 August 2026 — 119,125 subscribers9 August 2026 — 119,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 119,220 subscribers11 August 2026 — 119,270 subscribers12 August 2026 — 119,325 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119,029–119,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:32119,325+55
11 Aug 2026, 02:11119,270+50
10 Aug 2026, 01:21119,220+41
9 Aug 2026, 02:31119,179+54
8 Aug 2026, 04:01119,125+57
7 Aug 2026, 00:36119,068-14
6 Aug 2026, 18:46119,082first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 119,325 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.062%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held77 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total975,350
Reactions total604
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,500
Videos
148
Links
10,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

604 reactions across 76 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42269.9%
🔥7712.7%
👍6811.3%
🙏254.14%
👏50.828%
🥰50.828%
👌10.166%
👎10.166%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 604reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,560 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

उत्तर प्रदेश का राज्य पक्षी कौन-सा है?

  1. मोर17%
  2. तोता5%
  3. कोयल5%
  4. सारस73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍31

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,600 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

'अमानगढ़' टाइगर रिजर्व यूपी के किस जिले में है?

  1. बहराइच20%
  2. बिजनौर35%
  3. महोबा15%
  4. ललितपुर30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3🙏2

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,560 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

'दुधवा टाइगर रिजर्व' उत्तर प्रदेश के किस जिले में स्थित है?

  1. लखीमपुर खीरी73%
  2. पीलीभीत17%
  3. बिजनौर5%
  4. चित्रकूट5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,400 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

उत्तर प्रदेश में न्यूनतम वन क्षेत्र वाला जिला कौन-सा है?

  1. भदोही (संत रविदास नगर)58%
  2. मऊ13%
  3. संभल12%
  4. संतकबीर नगर17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,370 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

क्षेत्रफल के अनुसार उत्तर प्रदेश का सर्वाधिक वनावरण वाला जिला कौन-सा है?

  1. भदोही10%
  2. लखीमपुर खीरी40%
  3. मिर्जापुर12%
  4. सोनभद्र38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2👍2🙏1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,340 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

'किसान बही योजना' उत्तर प्रदेश में कब शुरू की गई?

  1. 199012%
  2. 199241%
  3. 200025%
  4. 201622%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🙏1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,300 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

उत्तर प्रदेश में जमींदारी प्रथा का अंत कब से प्रभावी हुआ?

  1. 15 अगस्त 194718%
  2. 26 जनवरी 195019%
  3. 1 जुलाई 195239%
  4. 24 जनवरी 195025%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🙏1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,260 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

'उत्तर प्रदेश जोत चकबंदी अधिनियम' किस वर्ष पारित हुआ था?

  1. 195015%
  2. 195340%
  3. 195824%
  4. 196020%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2👍2

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,330 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

राजस्व परिषद का मुख्यालय कहाँ स्थित है?

  1. लखनऊ45%
  2. वाराणसी13%
  3. प्रयागराज35%
  4. कानपुर7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🙏1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,360 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

राजस्व परिषद की स्थापना किस वर्ष हुई थी?

  1. 183123%
  2. 185725%
  3. 194719%
  4. 195033%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1🙏1

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,760 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 UPSSSC PET में अब होगा 80+ स्कोर 15 दिन 15 मैराथन में सम्पूर्ण GK GS खत्म 🔥 साथियों UPSSSC PET 2026 में 80+ स्कोर के लिए विवेक भैया 15 दिन 15 मैराथन क्लास ले के आए है, आज पूरा विज्ञान सिलेबस एक ही क्लास में खत्म, सभी साथी आज रात 9 बजे EXAMPUR पर LIVE आ जाना🙏❤️ 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://www.youtube.com/live/TVgJG-Hvsng?si=gf6jbkALI_Ky6lyj https://www.youtube.com/live/TVgJG-Hvsng?si=gf6jbkALI_Ky6lyj

4

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

12 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC≈3,300 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/0iYz0cfxSR4?si=00w1FLNk2QMuSATH

3

Signed 𝐌𝐒 𝐏𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐒𝐇 𝐘𝐀𝐃𝐀𝐕

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @exampurofficialtelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 50 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz844 voters

उत्तर प्रदेश का राज्य पक्षी कौन-सा है?

  1. मोर17%
  2. तोता5%
  3. कोयल5%
  4. सारस73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz694 voters

'अमानगढ़' टाइगर रिजर्व यूपी के किस जिले में है?

  1. बहराइच20%
  2. बिजनौर35%
  3. महोबा15%
  4. ललितपुर30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz705 voters

'दुधवा टाइगर रिजर्व' उत्तर प्रदेश के किस जिले में स्थित है?

  1. लखीमपुर खीरी73%
  2. पीलीभीत17%
  3. बिजनौर5%
  4. चित्रकूट5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz678 voters

उत्तर प्रदेश में न्यूनतम वन क्षेत्र वाला जिला कौन-सा है?

  1. भदोही (संत रविदास नगर)58%
  2. मऊ13%
  3. संभल12%
  4. संतकबीर नगर17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz654 voters

क्षेत्रफल के अनुसार उत्तर प्रदेश का सर्वाधिक वनावरण वाला जिला कौन-सा है?

  1. भदोही10%
  2. लखीमपुर खीरी40%
  3. मिर्जापुर12%
  4. सोनभद्र38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz605 voters

'किसान बही योजना' उत्तर प्रदेश में कब शुरू की गई?

  1. 199012%
  2. 199241%
  3. 200025%
  4. 201622%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 26,113 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Teaching by Rojgar With Ankit™🎖️
@teachingbyrojgaarwithankit · 175,394
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
SSC MAKER
@sscmakeryoutubechannel · 158,615
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
rwacurrentaffairs™🎖️
@rwacurrentaffairs · 422,135
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
GURUJI WORLD
@gurujiworldexam · 282,496
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Study For Dreams
@studyfordreams · 199,896
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
One Liner Static GK ™
@One_Liner_Static_GK_GS_GA · 280,803
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
SSC Adda247
@sscadda_official · 384,361
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
THE WINNERS OFFICIAL🏆
@thewinners108 · 166,399
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
The Winners Institute (Official) 🎯
@WinnersInstituteIndoreAdityaSir · 695,161
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exampur Official Telegram” (@exampurofficialtelegram), 119,325 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exampurofficialtelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.