Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АБП: Анᴧᴀᴋ бᴏᴛᴏʙ|ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇᴩᴋи

Channel

АБП: Анᴧᴀᴋ бᴏᴛᴏʙ|ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇᴩᴋи

@examinationbots

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002314033514
TypeChannel
Username@examinationbots
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/examinationbots

Growth

78828010 August 2026 — 82 subscribers10 August 2026 — 82 subscribers17 August 2026 — 81 subscribers25 August 2026 — 80 subscribers8 September 2026 — 79 subscribers17 September 2026 — 78 subscribers10 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:5978-1
8 Sept 2026, 19:1979-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:1480-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:4281-1
10 Aug 2026, 14:0082no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:4682first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

Проверка бота @evilsdemon_bot Попался администратор #ангелок Ответ: 10/10 Через минуту. Поддержка: 3/10 Очень странный админ,и очень хуевая поддержка. админ делает вывод: «люди просто тупые и не понимают, как с тобой общаться». Это не помогает разобраться в ситуации и, наоборот, слишком сильно упрощает проблему. Вместо того чтобы расспросить пользователя о конкретных ситуациях, выяснить, почему у него возникает та

21 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC45 viewsread 10 August 2026

Проверка бота @glubinadeshi_bot Попался администратор #хранитель Ответ: 10/10 Сразу. Поддержка: 2/10 Поддержка максимально хуевая, да и это поддержкой назвать сложно, понабирают всяких в поддержку. Вместо того чтобы разобраться, почему человек настолько зависит от чужого мнения, админ пишет: «Просто забей на них твёрдый хрен». Че? Это вообще не помощь. Если бы всё решалось такой фразой, поддержки бы не существовал

19 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC50 viewsread 10 August 2026

Проверка бота @mrachnui_pockoi_bot Попался администратор #милки Ответ: 9/10 Через 2 минуты. Поддержка: 3/10 Админ быстро включился в разговор и дал пользователю возможность выговориться. Не перебивал и задавал уточняющие вопросы («расскажи подробнее», «а какую музыку слушаешь?»), благодаря чему диалог не был сухим. Поддерживал доброжелательный тон и дал понять, что пользователь может обратиться снова. Основная про

19 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC36 viewsread 10 August 2026

И куда просмотры пропали, че за нах

19 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC39 viewsread 10 August 2026

Проверка бота @Guardian_angel111_bot Попался администратор #дозочка Ответ: 8/10 Спустя 4 минуты. Поддержка: 2/10 Админ в этом диалоге демонстрирует абсолютную профессиональную беспомощность, полное отсутствие эмпатии и неумение работать с базовой человеческой тревогой. Весь диалог состоит из бесполезных советов, которые только сильнее вгоняют пз в тупик. С самого начала админ закидывает пользователя банальными иде

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @examinationbots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АБП: Анᴧᴀᴋ бᴏᴛᴏʙ|ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇᴩᴋи” (@examinationbots), 78 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/examinationbots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.