National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 36 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -334. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,769–18,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 00:58
17,819
-8
8 Nov 2026, 14:37
17,827
-6
7 Nov 2026, 09:26
17,833
-5
6 Nov 2026, 11:47
17,838
-2
5 Nov 2026, 11:27
17,840
+4
4 Nov 2026, 12:09
17,836
-4
3 Nov 2026, 12:45
17,840
-6
2 Nov 2026, 13:16
17,846
-5
1 Nov 2026, 16:40
17,851
-8
31 Oct 2026, 13:41
17,859
-7
30 Oct 2026, 10:40
17,866
-6
29 Oct 2026, 08:39
17,872
+4
28 Oct 2026, 06:11
17,868
-3
27 Oct 2026, 06:27
17,871
-2
26 Oct 2026, 09:10
17,873
-8
25 Oct 2026, 12:36
17,881
+3
24 Oct 2026, 15:44
17,878
-8
23 Oct 2026, 17:36
17,886
-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:01
17,888
-9
19 Oct 2026, 15:57
17,897
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
67.5%
avg views ÷ 17,819 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,000
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
46 (6 June 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
204,460
Reactions total
2,067
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
821
Videos
227
Links
388
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,089 reactions across 46 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
3,155
28.5%
👍
1,741
15.7%
😢
1,376
12.4%
🔥
1,255
11.3%
❤
943
8.50%
🙏
820
7.39%
🤯
734
6.62%
🤔
601
5.42%
👏
177
1.60%
😱
168
1.52%
👎
119
1.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,089 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (70.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#новости #нато #ии
ПОЧУВСТВУЙТЕ РАЗНИЦУ!
В понедельник в Военно-морском колледже, в Ньюпорте, министр обороны США Пит Хегсет объявил о масштабных образовательных директивах, направленных на «децивилизацию» военного высшего образования и приведение его в соответствие с приоритетами ведения боевых действий.
Были обнародованы 33 директивы. Среди ключевых изменений — ВЫПУСКНАЯ ИГРА С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ИССКУСТВЕННОГО ИНТЕ…
#нато #вооружение #балтика #статистика
ЧТО ЗАПЕЧАТАЕТ НАМ ВЫХОД ИЗ БАЛТИКИ?
Страны Балтийского региона проводят масштабную модернизацию своих ВМС.
Польша, Финляндия, Швеция и Германия готовятся в ближайшие 10 лет значительно усилить свои возможности.
Польша 🇵🇱:
- Фрегаты типа «Мечник» (Miecznik, проект 106) -3 ед;
Все три корпуса находятся в активной постройке.
- Дизельная подводная лодка Проект А26 – 3 ед;
Первы…
#новости #происшествия #черноеморе
В Чёрном море у румынского курорта Нептун турецкий буксир Ayaz Bey столкнулся с танкером Mentor, который направлялся на буксире в Турцию. Судно загружено под завязку подсолнечным маслом (11000 тонн) и операцию по его транспортировке осуществляла Турция.
Mentor неоднократно подвергался ударам БПЛА России.
В частности, около 2:30 ночи 23 сентября, шахед попал в надстройку танкера в …
#нездороваяфилософия
Те кто не изучают Историю, никогда не поймут механизмов происходящего сейчас.
Российскую Империю разрушили не большевики. Ее разрушила своя элита предателей. Шайка Керенского, ненадолго получившая Власть, разрушила ЕДИНСТВО страны в кратчайшие сроки. Вся эта элитка потом удачно смылась на вилы Европы. Большевики лишь удачно воспользовались плодами их "успехов" и подняли народ под свои знамёна …
#новости #вооружение #нато #балтика
Шведы продолжают эволюцию своего, уже легендарного, быстроходного десантного катера Combat Boat 90 (CB90).
Новый вариант, известный как CB90 Capability X (CB90 CX), изначально будет предлагаться в трех конфигурациях: для разведки, наблюдения и рекогносцировки (ISR), противокорабельной борьбы и противовоздушной обороны малой дальности (SHORAD).
При общей длине 18 м, ширине 4 м и о…
#личное #сво #вооружение #ликбез
На днях провел отстрел своей короткой вертикалки.
Стояло две задачи:
1. Привыкнуть к новому стволу 12 калибра.
2. Подобрать лучший патрон из имеющегося запаса.
В работе были следующие патроны:
- RECORD MAGNUM 12/76, дробь №3;
- TAXO HUNT MASTER 12/70, дробь №6;
- R10 100 TOP GAME 12/70, дробь №3;
- ТАХО БУРАН 12/70, дробь №5;
- ТАХО 12/70, картечь 8,2;
- IGLA 100, стальная дробь ВНЖ…
#фотозаклепки #новости
Большая дизель-электрическая подводная лодка (пр. 636.3) ВМФ России на Крайнем Севере, за которой наблюдает 1-я постоянная военно-морская группа НАТО (Standing NATO Maritime Group 1, SNMG1), 26 октября 2026 года.
#новости #балтика #трафик #нато #юмор
Ироничный плакат «Nice sanctions» на танкере Agioi Fanendes 🇲🇹, который везет 40 тысяч тонн соляры в Нью-Йорк 🇺🇸.
Надпись заметили и сфотографировали утром, 26 октября, датские рыбаки 🇩🇰.
В настоящий момент судно вышло из "Балтийских проливов".
Ориентировочная дата прибытия в США - 7 ноября.
#видео #сво #бпла #ликбез
Вывод из строя 155-мм самоходной артиллерийской установки "CAESAR" 🇫🇷
Была принята на вооружение Франции в начале 2000-х.
ТТХ:
Масса 18 тонн, длина 10 м, ширина 2,55 м. Высота 3,7 м в обычном положении, со сложенным орудием — 2,7 м.
Кабина — бронированная, обеспечивает защиту от пуль калибра до 7,62 мм и осколков снарядов. Вместимость — 5 чел.
Запас хода 600 км, скорость — до 100 км/ч.
Ма…
#юмор #видео
Нецензурная лексика. 18+
... Когда уйду на пенсию, буду чудить 🤣
🔥40🤔10🤯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @evilsailor2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@evilsailor2 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @evilsailor2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Злой Морячок” (@evilsailor2), 17,819 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evilsailor2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.