ЭТО СЛИШКОМ HOT😭🫀 #lanaparrilla
custom 519314328227992741036custom 529440838909743866918custom 524720187956109679710

Channel
@evil_parrilla
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002035989581 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @evil_parrilla |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/evil_parrilla |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 157 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 157 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
327 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5247201879561096797 | 105 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5193143282279927410 | 70 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5294408389097438669 | 70 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5354906435140468933 | 48 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5417897086928572591 | 25 | 7.65% | |
| custom 5283228584930988363 | 9 | 2.75% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 16 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evil_parrilla. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2025 to 16 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЭТО СЛИШКОМ HOT😭🫀 #lanaparrilla
custom 519314328227992741036custom 529440838909743866918custom 524720187956109679710
SO PERFECT 🖤 #lanaparrilla
custom 524720187956109679723custom 51931432822799274109custom 53549064351404689336
🪬 #daenerystargaryen
custom 535490643514046893314custom 52832285849309883634custom 52472018795610967972
⛪⛪когда по настоящему любишь, то никакие цифры не имеют значения.⛪⛪
custom 53549064351404689338custom 54178970869285725914custom 52472018795610967973custom 51931432822799274102custom 52832285849309883631
I can’t 💔 #daenerystargaryen
custom 541789708692857259114custom 52472018795610967971
US 💋 #daenerystargaryen
custom 535490643514046893310custom 51931432822799274106custom 52472018795610967974custom 52944083890974386691
🐆 #elizabetolsen
custom 524720187956109679714custom 51931432822799274103custom 53549064351404689333custom 52944083890974386691
🌸 #angelinajolie
custom 529440838909743866920custom 52472018795610967976custom 52832285849309883633custom 53549064351404689331
мои заи 🌟 #angelinajolie
custom 519314328227992741011custom 52472018795610967976custom 52944083890974386694custom 52832285849309883631
HB TO U
custom 524720187956109679710custom 52944083890974386692custom 53549064351404689332
okay. 🤩 #handeercel
custom 529440838909743866913custom 53549064351404689334custom 51931432822799274103
beauty 🩷 #lanaparrilla
custom 524720187956109679726custom 529440838909743866911custom 54178970869285725917
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @evil_parrilla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 920,442 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝒂𝒏𝒂𝒙𝒙𝒙” (@evil_parrilla), 157 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evil_parrilla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.