Channel
@evidencepolicecorruption
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002165138248 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @evidencepolicecorruption |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/evidencepolicecorruption |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 8 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
The first one, express consent for medication is the one On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 10:19 AM CHIP (CAMDEN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PRACTICE) <[email protected]> wrote: We do not have the option to record what you are asking for, The options below are all that are available. Administration Team Camden Health Improvement Practice Basement 108 Hampstead Road London NW1 2LS Tel: 0203 182 4200 Fax:0203 317 6364…
Just spoke to gp, they would not put the advance decision to refuse treatment in my official electronic file, only on the patient file. Artificial robot legal advice are wrong, or it does not work in the system trying to beat the system using the system
Could I please have a written response why this cannot be recorded in the electronic flag? Thanks
Checking claim number Dear Julia, Is there claim numbers yet? Thanks
Dear Angie, Ref No: SAR/2026/981 - Acknowledgment The Trust acknowledges receipt of your request. We can confirm that your request is being processed. In accordance with statutory obligations, we will endeavour to respond to your request without undue delay and within one month from the date your request was received. Based on this we expect to respond to your request by 09/09/26 Please note that due to…
Thank you for your enquiry. Unfortunately we cannot assist as we do not do these type of cases. We specialise in Criminal and Family law cases. -- Kind Regards Andy Symeou FARADAYS SOLICITORS Solicitor & Director
August 11th, 2026 Sent more CONFIDENTIAL – REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE to solicitors as I cannot handle the admin work due to disability of Cptsd
social-care support following the events described above. My chronology records dealings with Haringey, Camden and Ealing authorities, including delays concerning social-care support, disability-related needs and administrative assistance. I have sent pre-action correspondence and preservation notices to relevant authorities. I seek advice on whether any public-law, statutory-duty, discrimination, Human Rights Act…
CONFIDENTIAL – REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE Proposed claims concerning Metropolitan Police, data protection, social care, healthcare and related matters Potential Claimant: Dr Angie Lin Jurisdiction: England and Wales 1. Purpose of this document I am seeking specialist legal advice concerning a number of connected incidents involving policing, alleged loss of property, data-protection issues, social-care matters and su…
Don't worry I signed it already and had someone witnessed as well Doctor just needs to log it onto the system, code it onto the electronic record as summary care record (SCR) flag
Good morning. I've spoken to the doctor, and general practitioners do not sign Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment orders. You would have to see a solicitor about this matter. Administration Team Camden Health Improvement Practice Basement 108 Hampstead Road London NW1 2LS Tel: 0203 182 4200
please see attached BRP and bank statement
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @evidencepolicecorruption. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 694,316 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Evidence” (@evidencepolicecorruption), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evidencepolicecorruption.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.