Channel
@evgeniya_ponyavkina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
902subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001540027340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @evgeniya_ponyavkina |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/evgeniya_ponyavkina |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 902 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 905 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 913 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 918 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 915 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 916 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 34.6% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 30.9% | |
| custom 5472030678633684592 | 13 | 16.0% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 8.64% | |
| custom 5417981238222819536 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.47% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Думаю, те кто прочтет этот комментарий, мысленно скажут: "Это и про меня тоже." На самом деле, прийти к психологу - это не про наличие проблем. Это про желание жить легче, спокойнее и осознаннее. И, самое интересное, что почти каждый клиент, который ко мне приходит впервые, говорит одну и ту же фразу: "Надо было сделать это раньше" Созревайте, приходите @evgenija_ponyavkina
🔥2
Страшно интересно, ни разу не был у психолога, может и я скоро созрею
Что делали с этим мужчиной? Делали расстановку на листочках закрытую. Для своих умных клиентов я провожу именно закрытые расстановки, чтобы отключить их логику и добраться до настоящего внутреннего состояния, до все тех частей, которые привносят хаос в жизнь. Наводим порядок внутри, дальше мозг видит новую картинку нового состояния, получает удовольствие и фиксирует это состояние, как то, на которое теперь будет о…
👍2
Мужчина клиент у психолога, это про фразу "Пришел, увидел, победил" Это самые долго неприходящие клиенты, но если ОН пришел, ОН заберет максимум🤝🏆 Профессиональный кайф 👌
❤3
✔️Цитата 06 августа 2026 Работа и любовь - это два мощнейших устремления, которые взаимосвязаны и взаимозависимы и не должны отделятся одно от другого. ✍️Ваш комментарий = ваше вложение в новое мышление #цитатник_миллиардера 💸ДУМАЙ КАК МИЛЛИАРДЕР
❤2🔥1custom 54720306786336845921
А я продолжаю копать))
🔥6
✔️Цитата 05 августа 2026 Если бы романтика и влюбленность не занимали существенного места в моей жизни, то откуда бы я черпал силы и вдохновение для того, чтобы стать лучшим? ✍️Ваш комментарий = ваше вложение в новое мышление #цитатник_миллиардера 💸ДУМАЙ КАК МИЛЛИАРДЕР
❤5
Рассказываю больше о запросах и состояниях людей. Как общаться с психологом?
custom 54179812382228195363
Грани ваших запросов🤗 Обожаю все❤️ ✅️ Мольба о помощи Евгения, вы нас возьмете? Евгения, а вы сможете со мной поработать?🙏 ✅️ Уверенное понимание того, что нужна помощь специалиста в решении вопросов Здравствуйте, у меня такой запрос, хочу записаться на консультацию ✅️ Уверенное самовосхваление себя и своей проблемы (гордыня) Мне вас посоветовали, запишите на консультацию, хотя я знаю, что мне никто не поможет…
🔥4
✔️Цитата 04 августа 2026 Конкурсы красоты приносят огромную прибыль - прекрасные женщины всегда привлекают к себе большое внимание. ✍️Ваш комментарий = ваше вложение в новое мышление #цитатник_миллиардера 💸ДУМАЙ КАК МИЛЛИАРДЕР
custom 54720306786336845926❤2
Август - месяц для перестройки рабочих процессов по-новому☀️ У кого есть непреодолимое желание выйти из тревожного состояния, непонимания куда и как двигаться, хаоса в голове, и начать наконец жить, а не выживать, пишите, что-нибудь да подберем🤝 @evgenija_ponyavkina
✔️Цитата 03 августа 2026 Женщины - великие мотиваторы и вдохновители ✍️Ваш комментарий = ваше вложение в новое мышление #цитатник_миллиардера 💸ДУМАЙ КАК МИЛЛИАРДЕР
💯5custom 54720306786336845924
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @evgeniya_ponyavkina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Евгения Понявкина | Психолог | Коуч для предпринимателей” (@evgeniya_ponyavkina), 902 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgeniya_ponyavkina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.