Channel
@everskiezmli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002202707556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @everskiezmli |
| Description | 𝙊𝙒𝙉𝙀𝙍 – @satsune_mi 𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊 – @everskiezmin |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 19 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/everskiezmli |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 14 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 14 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
51 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 33.3% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 17.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.96% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2024 to 20 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ещё раз здравствуйте！мы снова на связи. аккаунт мне не вернулся, флуд уже пересоздан, как и всё остальное. лайф уже сделан, так что присоединяйтесь туда, ссылка на него будет ниже, но вам снова нужно отметиться будет. . . в лайфе есть соо "союзы", в комментарии под этим постом вы пишите ТОЛЬКО ссылку на инфо и на лайф. названия мне не надо, всех вас надо заново собрать в одном папке, да и мне, тоже, ещё раз добавитьс…
❤🔥4💘2🍓1
итак, ℌ𝔬𝔲𝔯 𝔬𝔣 𝔧𝔲𝔡𝔤𝔪𝔢𝔫𝔱, вы у меня ассоциируетесь с. . . вишнёвым вкусом！ надеюсь, что вам понравится результат. приносим извинения, если он вас как-то неудовлетворил.🌟 их инфо и лайф： инфо лайф #результаты_𝘝𝘚
❤3👍1
я очень надеюсь, что это лишь сбой в тг и мой аккаунт будет возвращен. доступа к номеру телефона от того акка у меня нет, потому что там указан СТАРЫЙ, а здесл новый. мне очень жаль, что так получилось, но я обязательно постараюсь что-нибудь сделать. если не получится – результаты ассоциации будут на другом лайф-канал, который будет создан в случае невозврата. всех целую, сацу！ #репост_𝘝𝘚 #важно_𝘝𝘚
🔥2💘1
так же попрошу не отписываться от каналов, потому что от лица скарамуччи будет выложен новый инфо, если он, конечно, будет. #репост_𝘝𝘚 #важно_𝘝𝘚
🙏2👌1
Здравствуйте,пишет Скарамучча,админ-активист данного флуда,у владельца слетел аккаунт в телеграмме так что возможно флуд пересоздадут,оформление и название останется то же,что и сейчас.
🤯9😢2👎1💔1🙏1
🌟：инет убежище полное, че происходит. #щп_𝘝𝘚
👍1
🌟：союзник, который стал моим мужем, либо пост я опубликую завтра, либо сообщу вам. это также касается к союзникам, хз вщ, че у меня происходит с тг, что никакие посты с фотками не грузят. поэтому результаты могут задержаться, в связи с такой ситуацией. у всех прошу прощения. #важно_𝘝𝘚 #репост_𝘝𝘚 ( по желанию )
❤4🔥2🍓1😢1😱1
🌟：прикол, я в лайф не могу почему-то отправить пост о союзе.
❤2
{🍵}: Как думаете.. лучше интерактивы проводить, когда пдп будет больше..? Вроде хочется ассоциацию для вас провести, а вроде рано #щп #repostAC (?)
❤2
🌟 Давно я не делал бинго. Ну чтож, поехали! Передали 𝙲𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚒𝚎𝚕𝚍 𝚏𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚍 🌝Правила Сделать бинго. Передать не менее 4-м союзникам. А я передам: Всем желающим! Ведь некоторые уже участвовали, а кто-то нет. #щпСкар #бинго
О БОГИ, И ДО ВАС ЖТА УЧАСТЬ ДОШЛА, Я РЫДАБ . . . #разрыв_𝘝𝘚
❤3
✨✨✨ ✨✨✨ К сожалению 14.04.24 - 19.09.24 Здравствуйте всем кто читает этот пост, но к сожалению проект 「🪻」fᥣ᧐ᥕᥱr ɦ᧐ᥙsᥱ с сегодняшнего дня официально закрыт. С начала открытия проекта, до заморозки, и по сегодняшний день, участники набирались но не активили. Я не раз пыталась поднять актив, не спорю что были участники которые пытались активить, или хотя бы отвечали на мои вопросы в калле, но прям постоянного актива во…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @everskiezmli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 835,135 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@everskiezmli named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“〣⚡₊life-everskiez «🎮» ᡴꪫ” (@everskiezmli), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/everskiezmli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.