Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for evaari;

Channel

evaari;

@evaari_s

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

998subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185128686
TypeChannel
Username@evaari_s
Created8 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/evaari_s

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9981,0121,0057 August 2026 — 1,012 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,012 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,011 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,009 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,006 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,004 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,002 subscribers17 September 2026 — 998 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 996–1,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:39998-4
10 Sept 2026, 17:591,002-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:161,004-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:361,006-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:281,009-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:351,011-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:331,012no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:501,012first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,538 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤91836.2%
❤‍🔥63625.1%
custom 53845630211106098781666.54%
💔1305.12%
🍓1184.65%
🕊1174.61%
🔥1154.53%
💘1134.45%
🤯783.07%
🤡592.32%
🥰311.22%
🙏291.14%
👻210.827%
🍾50.197%
💋10.039%
😘10.039%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evaari_s. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 23 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 May 2026, 11:18 UTC790 views176 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Привет, лапули, вы живы? Я да. Ситуация такая: я сейчас занимаюсь своим здоровьем, хожу по разным врачам, проблем хватает от психиатра до гинеколога 🥲 вернусь ещё не скоро, но уверена что вернусь; кто ждёт, спасибо большое🩷

🕊99💘36❤27🍓10🙏2🔥1😘1

31 Jan 2026, 13:37 UTC≈2,190 views122 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Признаюсь, я ненавииижу рисовать одежду, особенно оверсайз. Мне скучно, складки я леплю рандомно; совершенно не хочется разбираться в этих формах, а если она к тому же черного/серого цвета, то я вообще того рот ебал 🤩. У вас есть нелюбимый этап в рисовании??

❤84🙏27💘11

31 Jan 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,800 views242 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отретушировала Мартина, чтоб посмотреть на его не разрубленную версию #evaari

💔122❤‍🔥60❤30🕊18💘7🍓2🔥2💋1

29 Jan 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,490 views236 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не могу определиться как лучше публиковать такой формат, буду два поста делать #evaari

❤128❤‍🔥48🔥39custom 538456302111060987813💘8

29 Jan 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,680 views292 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Просмотр бесплатный, так уж и быть 🤩 #evaari

❤‍🔥158❤68custom 538456302111060987844🔥12💘8💔2

29 Jan 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,320 views244 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Боже, я только щас заметила, что не кидала сюда эти работы в качестве; у вас нет ощущения, что админ вообще не рисует? 🤩 #evaari

❤139🍓50❤‍🔥42🥰9custom 53845630211106098783💘1

29 Jan 2026, 13:04 UTC914 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Щас сходила до типографии, потому что домой к своему принтеру попаду ещё нескоро. Емаа, 60 руб отсканировать 1 картинку 🌟 я думала это стоит рубля 4 ахаха 🤡 а скока тогда стоит сделать принты на качественной бумаге и продавать с наценкой; комнату в Москве и дубайский шоколад? 😐

❤64custom 538456302111060987811

29 Jan 2026, 10:26 UTC915 views117 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И даже аппеляцию забраковали; вот так и дрочи картинку месяц, чтобы тикток ею подтёрся 🥴 Зато вчера мне в рекомендациях попалось порно видео с ослами и со всеми подробностями их гениталий; на нем было около 2 млн лайков, а в комментариях куча извращенцев, восхищающихся этим процессом. Мне кажется, что вот это я не должна была видеть, но о моей психике они не позаботились 👹

🤯78❤19❤‍🔥10💔6🤡4

29 Jan 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,060 views155 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неоригинальный и низкокачественный, я ору 😆

❤74🤡55👻21❤‍🔥5

25 Jan 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,380 views247 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Еееей 🤩 #evaari

❤‍🔥125❤62💘42🥰10custom 53845630211106098785🍓3

22 Jan 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,240 views338 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тревожно доделываю 🌟

❤‍🔥188❤77🔥59🍓10custom 53845630211106098784

22 Jan 2026, 04:19 UTC≈1,260 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Яой

  1. Одобряем93%
  2. Не одобряем7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 538456302111060987831🍾5

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @evaari_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jan 2026, 04:19 UTCAnonymous Poll290 voters

Яой

  1. Одобряем93%
  2. Не одобряем7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 23 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“evaari;” (@evaari_s), 998 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evaari_s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.