Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Царионов

@etsarionov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

593subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001973715270
TypeChannel
Username@etsarionov
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/etsarionov

Growth

5935955946 August 2026 — 595 subscribers6 August 2026 — 595 subscribers13 August 2026 — 593 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 593–595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:45593-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:48595no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:07595first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.7%
avg views ÷ 593 subscribers
Avg views / post
354
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held10 (16 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,540
Reactions total284
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

284 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11139.1%
🔥6322.2%
🥰248.45%
😢196.69%
🤣186.34%
👍155.28%
🌚103.52%
❤‍🔥72.46%
💯51.76%
👎41.41%
💊20.704%
😁20.704%
🤬20.704%
🫡20.704%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC167 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(про то, почему аниме в России так популярно) Написал тут заметку для РБК Life (в качестве промо книги, конечно). Собрал там немного статистики: сборы аниме в кинотеатрах, рост внимания стримингов, влияние манги и ранобэ на книжный рынок. И выделил три причины такой популярности (хотя ими, конечно, все не исчерпывается): https://www.rbc.ru/life/news/6a71ed2d9a7947ff7bf26114

21💯2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC189 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(про новости книги) Всего за неделю продаж ушла половина первого тиража! Что вообще-то офигенно! Правда, в некоторых книжных (и, например, почему-то на озоне) из-за этого кончились экземпляры. Но «Альпина» вроде бы уже заказала второй тираж — и книга должна в течение пары дней снова там появиться. А в Яндекс Книгах, где доступна диджитал-версия, книга забралась на третье место по популярности за неделю — больше 15

23🔥11👍6😁1

3 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC214 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пока я только смотрю издалека на игры и думаю, хочу ли ими заниматься, мой друг Виталя уже вовсю фигачит прототипы и участвует в геймджемах. Очень рад за него — и вы порадуйтесь! https://t.me/vebervdele/2267

7❤‍🔥4🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC227 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(про «Человека-паука») Сходил вчера на «Человека-паука: Новый день» и вспомнил, что я вообще-то раньше вел киноподкаст — а значит могу писать и про кино тоже. Все потому что мне понравилось! Я вообще не большой фанат паука Холланда. Предыдущие три фильма были пускай и симпатичными, но слишком уж наивными и простыми на мой вкус. Паук Гарфилда был мне ближе — с его едкими шуточками, обаятельной харизмой и взрослой жи

25🔥6💯3😁1

30 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC299 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если вы еще не видели, у меня вышла книга! (ее уже можно купить в книжных физически, почитать в диджитале и даже послушать в аудиоформате) И в честь этого мы записали большой документальный ролик про то, как книга создавалась, из чего состоит и зачем вообще нужна:

10🔥5❤‍🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC277 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @podcastbakaPhoto

📚 Мы выпустили целую книгу — гид по аниме! Как она создавалась? | ft. Кинопоиск и Яндекс Книги Вместе с Кинопоиском, Яндекс Книгами и Альпина нон-фикшн мы сделали целую книгу об аниме — «Манга, моэ, исекай. Большой гид по аниме»! История аниме, главные режиссеры, особенности японской анимации и знаковые произведения. Все под одной обложкой. И в этом документальном видео, вместе с коллегами и авторами книги, я расск

🔥10🥰76

26 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC822 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(про англоязычный канал) Прошло полгода как я запустил англоязычный канал для «Баки!». Время оценить прогресс. Что получилось: — на днях мы перевалили за 10к подписчиков на YouTube — почти 30% аудитории из США, остальная почти равномерно размазана по Европе и Азии — мы перевели и выложили 13 видеоэссе, они в сумме собрали почти 800 тысяч просмотров — самый успешный ролик, про «Голубой период», собрал 546 тысяч про

🔥277👍6

20 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC399 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(про евротрип) В начале июля мы с друзьями отправились на машине в путешествие: стартовали в Кёльне, финишировали в Берлине, а по дороге проехали восемь стран от Люксембурга и Франции до Лихтенштейна и Чехии. И вот, спустя две недели, я успешно разобрал все несколько тысяч сделанных фотографий и рассказал во втором канале про каждую нашу остановку. Чем Люксембург отличается от Лихтенштейна, что растет на кустах в Б

🥰1712👍3

16 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC454 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

P.S. да, действительно, это A/B-тесты дизайна. Я не первый подопытный. И подкасты в новом потрясающем продуманном дизайне можно найти только если нажать вот на эту кнопку. И там внутри будут разделы, среди которых в самом конце есть подкасты. Это просто смешно

🤣17🌚10💊2🤬2

16 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC492 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(а это как вообще?) Сегодня, пытаясь выложить бонусный эпизод подкаста в ВК (у нас там все еще есть слушатели и подписчики, поэтому приходится), я обнаружил, что в группах больше не видно раздела с подкастами. Его просто нет нигде, ни на стене, ни в боковом меню, что уже проблема для аудитории. Так еще и я не мог как админ найти, как теперь попасть в раздел со всеми выпусками, чтобы опубликовать новый. К постам мо

😢19👎4🫡2🤣1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @etsarionov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 714,285 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Царионов” (@etsarionov), 593 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etsarionov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.