Внезапный мейк ⭐️Использовала кучу разных палеток (брала буквально всё, что попадается под руку), поэтому сегодня без списка использованной косметики Идея макияжа не моя, вдохновлено пинтерестом
❤52🔥12

Channel
@etoritamakeup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
587subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001866327971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @etoritamakeup |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/etoritamakeup |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 587 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 588 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 586 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 586 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 30 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
431 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 221 | 51.3% | |
| 🔥 | 75 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5353003876297491553 | 50 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5361985743835112101 | 47 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5352884197033790752 | 25 | 5.80% | |
| custom 5361811943688512595 | 13 | 3.02% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 431 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @etoritamakeup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2025 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Внезапный мейк ⭐️Использовала кучу разных палеток (брала буквально всё, что попадается под руку), поэтому сегодня без списка использованной косметики Идея макияжа не моя, вдохновлено пинтерестом
❤52🔥12
Макияж по референсу из пинтерест (в комментариях) 🦋Тени Oden’s eye Solmane II 🦋Карандаш Beauty Bomb Ufo 3 🦋Румяна Tammy Tanuka Медузность 🦋Карандаш для губ Vivienne Sabo 01 🦋Тинт Rom&nd Pomelo skin
custom 536198574383511210147❤25🔥13
Собрала показать небольшую кучку самоего интересного из новенького (и не очень) в моей «косметичке» Хайлайтеры Fenty Beauty серии Diamond Bomb: 💓Lavender luv'r В упаковке красив до невозможности, но на лице выглядит весьма обычно 🥲 По текстуре суховат, сложно набирается кистью 💓How many carats в миниатюре Очень понравился, россыпь блесток на прозрачной базе 💓Палетка румян Made By Mitchell - Atlas Of Anatomy Весьм…
❤42custom 536181194368851259513🔥8
Birthday makeup 🎂 (или макияж, стойко переживший несколько часов рыданий) 💕Палетка Beauty Showroom Zodiac 💕Карандаш Beauty Bomb eyepocalypce 02 💕Румяна Patrick Ta She’s that girl 💕Хайлайтер Dope Glow 💕Тинт Rom&nd Peeling angdoo
❤49custom 535288419703379075225🔥17
Пожалуй, без фейсчартов больше не красимся ✍🏻 🧡Основная рыжая сияха Tammy Tanuka Профессор Кошечкина (пресс) 🧡Во внутреннем уголке и в качестве хайлайтера оттенок из палетки Shellwe Makeup Liana 🧡Карандаш Lamel 406 🧡На щеках мешанина из старого бронзера D&G и румян Topface 🧡Помада Mac Marrakesh Mere
custom 535300387629749155350❤18🔥11
Несу разгрузочные фотки😁 Но не могу, не поделиться 🥹🥹🥹 Смотрите какой бомбезный кардиган связала мне талантливая красотка eto.Rita 🤩 спасибо тебе булочка 💕💕💕 Она сделала это по видео!!! Из инстаграма! Без схем и прочего! Мой шок в шоке И как красиво вписался мой макияж сегодня 😁 прям как чувствовала, что будет в тему 🤌🏼 Продолжаю уже второй год петь оды любви fd56 от #benuage
❤35🔥14
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @etoritamakeup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eto.rita” (@etoritamakeup), 587 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etoritamakeup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.