Channel
@etopodcastprokillers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
846subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001639347127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @etopodcastprokillers |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/etopodcastprokillers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 846 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 846 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (24 August 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,813 |
| Reactions total | 249 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
288 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 169 | 58.7% | |
| 😁 | 46 | 16.0% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 8.68% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 7.64% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 4.51% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.74% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.347% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
13-й выпуск декретного восьмого сезона — уже на платформах! 📎 Привет, наши дорогие подписчицы и подписчики. Предлагаем вашему вниманию второй выпуск по мотивам преступлений Фреда и Розмари Уэст. Они стали одной из самых жестоких пар-убийц в Великобритании. Парадоксальным образом у нас получилось поговорить об этом без ужасающих подробностей, хотя мы старались уместить все в ограниченные временные рамки. Об убийст…
❤9
Привет, друзья! Желаем вам хорошей недели. Завтра выйдет второй эпизод по мотивам истории супругов-убийц. Осторожно, редкое фото: Миша во время монтажа нового выпуска.
❤20🥰4
За что любим?
The shares total 231%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Такие разные, но все-таки мы вместе! Благодарим любимых за отзывы, нелюбимых — не благодарим. НО:
❤23
Итак, британские (они же наглосакские) эпизоды подкаста «Дверь в подвал»: — «Осторожно, вам пишет Жерар Депардье» — эпизод о супругах Сьюзан и Кристофере Эдвардс на основе сериала «Садоводы». — «Смытые в унитаз трупы» — выпуск, посвященный маньяку Деннису Нильсену. — «От усов, да и от тюрьмы не зарекайся» — выпуск про любимчика Чарльза Бронсона, самого опасного преступника Великобритании. — «Бандитский Лондон» — …
❤16
Привет, друзья! Желаем вам хорошей недели, несмотря на начало учебного года. Этот вторник пройдет без выпуска, но вторая часть о семье Уэст сейчас на монтаже. Сейчас соберем британские эпизоды, не переключайтесь.
❤25
Журнал секс-работник
🔥12😁7
Иллюстрации к первому выпуску про семью Уэст: — Фред Уэст с младшим братом в детстве — Фред с сестрами в подростковом возрасте — Роуз в средней школе — ранняя фотография Роуз и Фреда — Роуз с сыном Стивеном — она же — в журнале секс-работниц
❤12
📎Учебный год начался не без жести в России Так, в Красноярском крае школьница напала на учительницу 1 сентября. Инцидент произошел в городе Канск. Девочка учится в седьмом классе. Она распылила перцовый баллончик, а затем с ножом напала на педагога и других учеников. Всего пострадали семь человек, пятеро из них — дети. Все случилось перед линейкой, торжественное мероприятие отменили. Сотрудники школы задержали напа…
🤯22💔3
Ну реально
💯25❤1
12-й выпуск декретного восьмого сезона — уже на платформах! 📎 Привет, дорогие слушатели и слушательницы! Сага о школьных стрелках закрыта: мы возвращаемся к классическим уголовным делам. Сегодня говорим о преступной паре — Фреде и Розмари Уэст. Получается, британский кейс. Он выходит в двух эпизодах. В рамках этого выпуска обсуждаем, как маньяки докатились до жизни такой — про их детство и юность. В следующем — пр…
❤12
Привет, друзья! 1 сентября — отличный день для новых начинаний и старого-доброго подкаста «Дверь в подвал», поэтому завтра для вас выйдет эпизод по мотивам маньячной истории Фреда и Розмари Уэст. Всем учащимися — здоровья погибшим …
😁20❤14🤣3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @etopodcastprokillers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
За что любим?
The shares total 231%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 15 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дверь в подвал” (@etopodcastprokillers), 846 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etopodcastprokillers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.