Channel name was changed to «Клуб дебатов ДеБыть»

Channel
Клуб дебатов ДеБыть
@eto_debate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
130subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002175050632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eto_debate |
| Description | Проходит Осенний кубок по дебатам ДеБыть-2024. Проект канала @eto_b По всем вопросам в @eto_b_b |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eto_debate |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 130 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 21
- Links
- 68
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 53.8% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2024 to 30 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Осенний Кубок закончился Я благодарю всех, кто эти три месяца принимал участие в его работе. Каждого судью, каждого игрока, каждого зрителя. Это был интересный и полезный опыт. Новый — Зимний Кубок, обязательно пройдет в следующем году, но состоится на абсолютно других принципах и правилах. В этом году планирую рассказывать больше о дебатах и провести несколько эфиров о том, что из себя представляет этот формат и к…
❤11👍1
Итоги финала Осеннего кубка по дебатам ДеБыть-2024 В финале играли: Первый спикер утверждения: Михаил Первый спикер отрицания: Мария Второй спикер утверждения: Андрей Второй спикер отрицания: Говорун Финал судили 5 судей: философ Максим Велецкий; старокатолический епископ, владыка Иван; православный священник, отец Александр; философ, языческий традиционалист и писатель, Евгений Нечкасов; реформистский раввин Бенн…
❤8🔥3👍1👎1
Кто, на ваш взгляд, победил в финале?
- Первый спикер утверждения / Михаил15%
- Первый спикер отрицания / Мария15%
- Второй спикер утверждения / Андрей4%
- Второй спикер отрицания / Говорун8%
- Посмотреть ответы58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Запись финала Осеннего Кубка ДеБыть-2024 Мне, обычному жителю России, в руки попала волшебная лампа, способная выполнить 3 любые желания. Я высокоморальный человек, и хотел бы загадать избавление мира от войн, голода и болезней. Однако, волнуюсь по поводу последствий реализации моих действий. Тема дебатов: “Я должен воспользоваться волшебной лампой”. Первый спикер утверждения: Михаил Первый спикер отрицания: Мария …
🔥3
Ваше мнение: нужно ли воспользоваться волшебной лампой в этих условиях
- Да22%
- Нет35%
- Посмотреть ответы43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Live stream finished (51 minutes)
Live stream started
Live stream scheduled for Nov 23, 2024 at 17:00
Всем привет! Пришло время финальной игры. Она пройдет сегодня, в 20:00 Тема на финал: Мне, обычному жителю России, в руки попала волшебная лампа, способная выполнить 3 любые желания. Я высокоморальный человек, и хотел бы загадать избавление мира от войн, голода и болезней. Однако, волнуюсь по поводу последствий реализации моих действий. Тема дебатов: “Я должен воспользоваться волшебной лампой”. Первым спикером утв…
👍3🔥1
Таким образом, по результату полуфиналов определены 4 финалиста: Михаил, Говорун, Мария и Андрей Будем ждать финальную игру, в которой определиться, кто станет победителем Осеннего кубка ДеБыть-2024!
🔥5
Итого, распределяя баллы в порядке: 1-е место: 3 балла, 2-е места — 2 балла, 3-е место — 1 балл, 4-е место — 0 баллов, получаем следущую картину: Отец Антон: Говорун 3 Андрей 2 Фёдор 1 Антон 0 Егор: Говорун 3 Фёдор 2 балла Андрей 1 Антон 0 Отец Александр: Говорун 3 Антон 2 Андрей 1 Фёдор 0 Итого: Говорун 9 Андрей 4 Фёдор 3 Антон 2
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eto_debate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто, на ваш взгляд, победил в финале?
- Первый спикер утверждения / Михаил15%
- Первый спикер отрицания / Мария15%
- Второй спикер утверждения / Андрей4%
- Второй спикер отрицания / Говорун8%
- Посмотреть ответы58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ваше мнение: нужно ли воспользоваться волшебной лампой в этих условиях
- Да22%
- Нет35%
- Посмотреть ответы43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2024 to 30 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@alsedanilov · 6,2032 postsОдин день из жизни епископа
@Irkutsk_bishop · 1562 postsТак есть
@takestb · 5822 postsВелецкие тетради
@velnotes · 2,2192 postsarchaic smile
@archaicsmile · 4071 postper caritatem
@christINRI · 1761 post"Да не бомбит у меня!"
@danebombitumenia · 4271 postСветлое Будущее
@future_on_fire · 2761 postИудаизм без фильтра🪬
@nojewishfilterru · 3,3911 postреволюция детства
@revenfance · 5261 postЗаписки из подклета
@zapiski_iz_podkleta · 8891 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клуб дебатов ДеБыть” (@eto_debate), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eto_debate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.