$ETH went up to 1600💸
👍3👏1

Channel
@ethereumloverss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001759921973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ethereumloverss |
| Description | Dm owner @frreddyy Twitter https://twitter.com/wise_ape_gems/status/1578623879349604353?s=46&t=6k3wAToQuWLHgBXktsX5fA |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ethereumloverss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 20 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
99 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 61 | 61.6% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 19.2% | |
| 🐳 | 11 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 2.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2022 to 14 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$ETH went up to 1600💸
👍3👏1
wiseapegems.
👍2👏1
Join here for your daily 10x print @wise_apegems You all need to be in here 🔥
👍2👏1
$ITOSHII here heard many people walked about this one, and some based callers supporting it,I’ll grab a bag and hold let’s see how it goes 🔥 Entry: https://t.me/itoshiiportal https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x4728d705eb18b1926a5cf98c41ddab14e20c19d0 Come chitchat and chill with chadds 🍀 t.me/+lEof1QjXtZ0wM ✅: t.me/ethereumloverss
🔥3🐳1👍1
$EXOS Coming clean with charts looking bullish asf 🔥 Looks good to ape just DYOR, Low mc gem launched hours ago Mcap rn at $10k Mcap Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x2279d9c1c29cdf651195b3fcecda3b54007afa76 Dyor, Entry: t.me/exorcistseth LIKE, RT AND DROP COMMENTS ON THIS TWEET CHADDS ⭐️ https://twitter.com/wise_ape_gems/status/1604987951511113728?s=46&t=bIZFFFCvg3OKmD6EiXXU3w Come ch…
❤1🐳1👍1🔥1
#MESSI IS THE GOAT 🐐 🔥🎉🎊🍾🥳🍻
🐳1👍1
Tsuki no Usagi Buy! 🌘🌘🌘🌘🌘 Entry: t.me/GyokutoEntry 💵 0.05 ETH ($59.04) 🪙 229,094 GYOKUTO 🪪 0x6bae…da55 | Txn | Track ✅ New Holder 🔘 Market Cap $252,416 📊 Chart 🗳 Buy Now 🅰️ Alpha 🔵 Trending Like, RT and drop comments on this tweet chadds 🔥🔥 https://twitter.com/wise_ape_gems/status/1604479869022240768?s=46&t=bIZFFFCvg3OKmD6EiXXU3w Come chitchat and chill with chadds 🍀 t.me/+lEof1QjXtZ0wM ✅: t.me/ethere
🐳1👍1
dont sleep on $HOO, Dev pumps the comminuty and community pumps the chart, then dev delivers for community. The circle is complete. Keep holding strong 💪 back on a good entry Entry: https://t.me/houou_erc https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x0dff30f4a1c2e12dfe522cf0281505feacb09253 Come chitchat and chill with chadds 🍀 t.me/+lEof1QjXtZ0wM ✅: t.me/ethereumloverss
👍6🔥3🐳1
Raid tweet chadds 🍀 https://twitter.com/wise_ape_gems/status/1603816799027462155?s=46&t=OMeVjylPutE1QNfeTLBkqA
👍4🐳1🔥1
I just aped this it’s Good to see chart holding up well, higher lows being formed with a hard working team, Entry: @etportal dextools.io/app/ether/pair… 🦍: t.me/wise_apegems
👍3🐳1🔥1
big callers backing this one, many are talking about it jump in let’s go check it $BENDER I’ll grab a bag and see how it goes Entry: t.me/BenderERC https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x62dF2dB2d81E219033335c3fc1e34a7Fa7c8e323 Come chitchat and chill with chadds 🍀 t.me/+lEof1QjXtZ0wM ✅ http://t.me/ethereumloverss
👍3🐳1🔥1
🤖 Bot Detector Bot 🤖 ✅ Utility Token BSC VERSION OUT ETH VERSION OUT SOON ✅ Token Scanner that also scans for multi wallet bots ✅ Taxes 5/5 ✅ renounced ✅ Experienced team CHANGE THE SPACE WITH US ✴️ TOKENOMICS: - Supply: 1,000,000 TG: https://t.me/BotDetectorBotPortal https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xf9275bdfd2f9aa3273aa168036f4ccf32d40743d https://botdetectorbot.app/ https://twitter.com/botdetbot Com…
👍3🐳1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ethereumloverss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,185,612 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ethereumloverss named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ethereum lovers” (@ethereumloverss), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ethereumloverss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.