Channel
@ethereborn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
354subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003103516519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ethereborn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ethereborn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 354 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 354 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (8 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,356 |
| Reactions total | 427 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
836 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5472174907930485827 | 232 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5472405929926369086 | 154 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5472258904605890701 | 128 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5472342965705807383 | 86 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5472029948489274798 | 70 | 8.37% | |
| 🌚 | 64 | 7.66% | |
| custom 5244448324488027031 | 62 | 7.42% | |
| custom 5402109401328815595 | 40 | 4.78% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 836reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
посмотрела поиск левиафана все очень плохо вы ведь не против если я скетчи покидаю Я ХЗ ШТО ИЗ ЭТОГО НАРИСОВАТЬ У МЕНЧ МНОГО ИДЕЙ
custom 52444483244880270319🌚7custom 54021094013288155953
Photo, posted without a caption
🌚15custom 54021094013288155956custom 52444483244880270314
ббин
custom 524444832448802703133🌚18custom 540210940132881559512
я очень люблю когда вы пишите комментарии но давайте тыкать по реакциям тоже ! плюс я вам новые добавила
🌚21custom 540210940132881559514custom 524444832448802703111
напишите свои пейринги любимые я их зарисую тоже селфпейры тоже принимаются
custom 547225890460589070144custom 547240592992636908632custom 547202994848927479823custom 54021094013288155955🌚3custom 52444483244880270313
впервые такое рисую окей учтите что мне пох как рисовать фд персов они могут каждый раз меняться телосложением рисовкой и тд
custom 547217490793048582736custom 547234296570580738319custom 547202994848927479814custom 52444483244880270312
как дела кого из энимал хоспитал нарисовать я подсела
custom 547240592992636908627custom 547217490793048582711custom 54722589046058907018
привет я НИХЕРА не успеваю ничего у меня учеба и долги все пиздец с начала августа начнутся долги в полноценном стиле слава богу будет что показать на втором фота мой персонаж на первом адопт уже проданый
custom 547217490793048582725custom 547202994848927479812custom 54722589046058907016custom 54723429657058073834
атака на нован
custom 547225890460589070136custom 547234296570580738317custom 547240592992636908611custom 54721749079304858273
подстраиваемся под американский график теперь посты ночью /ш атакую не помню кого
custom 547240592992636908638custom 547225890460589070121custom 547217490793048582719
https://artfight.net/~angellwist ну вы пон покидайте свои профили тоже
custom 547217490793048582741custom 547234296570580738321custom 547240592992636908617
пожалуйста
custom 547240592992636908612custom 54722589046058907013custom 54723429657058073831
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ethereborn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 209,443 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤ mishя ㅤ” (@ethereborn), 354 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ethereborn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.